1. Now test use fake_relay_log primitive
2. Added RESET SLAVE to include/setup_fake_relay_log.inc for removing relay log info file
3. Added RESET SLAVE to include/cleanup_fake_relay_log.inc
4. Test moved to rpl suite as rpl_binlog_auto_inc_bug33029.test
5. Updated result file
--slave-load-tm
The MDL_SHARED lock was introduced for an object in 5.4, but the 'TABLE_LIST'
object was not initialized with the MDL_SHARED lock when applying event with
LOAD DATA INFILE into table. So the failure is caused when checking the
MDL_SHARED lock for the object.
To fix the problem, the 'TABLE_LIST' object was initialized with the MDL_SHARED
lock when applying event with LOAD DATA INFILE into table.
We found that there are some tests that are not cleaning
up properly:
1. rpl_tmp_table_and_DDL
2. rpl_do_grant
3. rpl_sync
For #1 and #2 we found that the slave would not, for some
cases, replicate all the instructions the master processed
in the cleanup section. We fix these by deploying some
synchronization commands in the test cases so that slave
processes all clean up instructions.
As for #3, this is tracked as part of another bug
(BUG@50442).
fails in PB sporadically)
The IO thread can concurrently access the relay log IO_CACHE
while another thread is performing an FLUSH LOGS procedure.
FLUSH LOGS closes and reopens the relay log and while doing so it
(re)initializes its IO_CACHE. During this procedure the IO_CACHE
mutex is also reinitialized, which can cause problems if some
other thread (namely the IO THREAD) is concurrently accessing it
at the time .
This patch fixes the problem by extending the interface of the
flush_master_info function to also include a second paramater,
"need_relay_log_lock", stating whether the thread should grab the
relay log lock or not before actually flushing the relay log.
Also, IO thread now calls flush_master_info with this flag set
when it flushes master info with in the event read_event loop.
Finally, we also increase loop time in rpl_heartbeat_basic test
case, so that the number of calls to flush logs doubles, stressing
this part of the code a little more.
Fix Bug#50555 "handler commands crash server in my_hash_first()"
as a post-merge fix (the new handler tests are not passing
otherwise).
- in hash.c, don't call calc_hash if ! my_hash_inited().
- add tests and results for the test case for Bug#50555
Original revision:
------------------------------------------------------------
revision-id: li-bing.song@sun.com-20100130124925-o6sfex42b6noyc6x
parent: joro@sun.com-20100129145427-0n79l9hnk0q43ajk
committer: <Li-Bing.Song@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-bugteam
timestamp: Sat 2010-01-30 20:49:25 +0800
message:
Bug #48321 CURRENT_USER() incorrectly replicated for DROP/RENAME USER;
REVOKE/GRANT; ALTER EVENT.
The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENT
but, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.
After this patch, All above statements are rewritten when they are binlogged.
The CURRENT_USER() is expanded to the real user's name and host.
------------------------------------------------------------
Linux x86_64 debug
Two test cases fail because the suppression for the unsafe
warning needs to be updated (BUG@39934 refactored this part and
these changes are only in mysql-next-mr - this is why we notice
them now when merging in next-mr). This is the case for
rpl_nondeterministic_functions and rpl_misc_functions test
cases. rpl_stm_binlog_direct test case is not needed in version >
5.1. The rpl_heartbeat_basic test case fails because patch for
BUG@50397 removed the CHANGE MASTER in the slave that would set
it's period to 1/10 of the master. This would cause the test
assertion to fail.
The fixes for the issues described above are:
- rpl_misc_functions - updated suppression message
- rpl_nondeterministic_functions - updated suppression message
- rpl_stm_binlog_direct - removed the test case (it is not
needed in versions > 5.1)
- rpl_heartbeat_basic - deployed instruction:
CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD=0.1;
Conflicts:
- mysql-test/r/mysqld--help-win.result
- sql/sys_vars.cc
Original revsion (in next-mr-bugfixing):
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2971 [merge]
revision-id: alfranio.correia@sun.com-20100121210527-rbuheu5rnsmcakh1
committer: Alfranio Correia <alfranio.correia@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-mr-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 21:05:27 +0000
message:
BUG#46364 MyISAM transbuffer problems (NTM problem)
It is well-known that due to concurrency issues, a slave can become
inconsistent when a transaction contains updates to both transaction and
non-transactional tables.
In a nutshell, the current code-base tries to preserve causality among the
statements by writing non-transactional statements to the txn-cache which
is flushed upon commit. However, modifications done to non-transactional
tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible to other
connections but may not immediately get into the binary log and therefore
consistency may be broken.
In general, it is impossible to automatically detect causality/dependency
among statements by just analyzing the statements sent to the server. This
happen because dependency may be hidden in the application code and it is
necessary to know a priori all the statements processed in the context of
a transaction such as in a procedure. Moreover, even for the few cases that
we could automatically address in the server, the computation effort
required could make the approach infeasible.
So, in this patch we introduce the option
- "--binlog-direct-non-transactional-updates" that can be used to bypass
the current behavior in order to write directly to binary log statements
that change non-transactional tables.
Besides, it is used to enable the WL#2687 which is disabled by default.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2970.1.1
revision-id: alfranio.correia@sun.com-20100121131034-183r4qdyld7an5a0
parent: alik@sun.com-20100121083914-r9rz2myto3tkdya0
committer: Alfranio Correia <alfranio.correia@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-mr-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 13:10:34 +0000
message:
BUG#46364 MyISAM transbuffer problems (NTM problem)
It is well-known that due to concurrency issues, a slave can become
inconsistent when a transaction contains updates to both transaction and
non-transactional tables.
In a nutshell, the current code-base tries to preserve causality among the
statements by writing non-transactional statements to the txn-cache which
is flushed upon commit. However, modifications done to non-transactional
tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible to other
connections but may not immediately get into the binary log and therefore
consistency may be broken.
In general, it is impossible to automatically detect causality/dependency
among statements by just analyzing the statements sent to the server. This
happen because dependency may be hidden in the application code and it is
necessary to know a priori all the statements processed in the context of
a transaction such as in a procedure. Moreover, even for the few cases that
we could automatically address in the server, the computation effort
required could make the approach infeasible.
So, in this patch we introduce the option
- "--binlog-direct-non-transactional-updates" that can be used to bypass
the current behavior in order to write directly to binary log statements
that change non-transactional tables.
Besides, it is used to enable the WL#2687 which is disabled by default.
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
The root cause of the crash is that a TranxNode is freed before it is used.
A TranxNode is allocated and inserted into the active list each time
a log event is written and flushed into the binlog file.
The memory for TranxNode is allocated with thd_alloc and will be freed
at the end of the statement. The after_commit/after_rollback callback
was supposed to be called before the end of each statement and remove the node from
the active list. However this assumption is not correct in all cases(e.g. call
'CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE myisam_t SELECT * FROM innodb_t' in a transaction
and delete all temporary tables automatically when a session closed),
and can cause the memory allocated for TranxNode be freed
before it was removed from the active list. So The TranxNode pointer in the active
list would become a wild pointer and cause the crash.
After this patch, We have a class called a TranxNodeAllocate which manages the memory
for allocating and freeing TranxNode. It uses my_malloc to allocate memory.
REVOKE/GRANT; ALTER EVENT.
The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENT
but, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.
After this patch, All above statements are rewritten when they are binlogged.
The CURRENT_USER() is expanded to the real user's name and host.
