Some of the test cases reference to binlog position and
these position numbers are written into result explicitly.
It is difficult to maintain if log event format changes.
There are a couple of cases explicit position number appears,
we handle them in different ways
A. 'CHANGE MASTER ...' with MASTER_LOG_POS or/and RELAY_LOG_POS options
Use --replace_result to mask them.
B. 'SHOW BINLOG EVENT ...'
Replaced by show_binlog_events.inc or wait_for_binlog_event.inc.
show_binlog_events.inc file's function is enhanced by given
$binlog_file and $binlog_limit.
C. 'SHOW SLAVE STATUS', 'show_slave_status.inc' and 'show_slave_status2.inc'
For the test cases just care a few items in the result of 'SHOW SLAVE STATUS',
only the items related to each test case are showed.
'show_slave_status.inc' is rebuild, only the given items in $status_items
will be showed.
'check_slave_is_running.inc' and 'check_slave_no_error.inc'
and 'check_slave_param.inc' are auxiliary files helping
to show running status and error information easily.
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.
In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
This is a post-push fix addressing review requests and
problems with extra warnings.
Problem 1: The sub-statement where an unsafe warning was detected was
printed as part of the warning. This was ok for statements that
were unsafe due to, e.g., calls to UUID(), but did not make
sense for statements that were unsafe because there was more than
one autoincrement column (unsafeness in this case comes from the
combination of several sub-statements).
Fix 1: Instead of printing the sub-statement, print an explanation
of why the statement is unsafe.
Problem 2:
When a recursive construct (i.e., stored proceure, stored
function, trigger, view, prepared statement) contained several
sub-statements, and at least one of them was unsafe, there would be
one unsafeness warning per sub-statement - even for safe
sub-statements.
Fix 2:
Ensure that each type of warning is printed at most once, by
remembering throughout the execution of the statement which types
of warnings have been printed.
General overview:
The logic for switching to row format when binlog_format=MIXED had
numerous flaws. The underlying problem was the lack of a consistent
architecture.
General purpose of this changeset:
This changeset introduces an architecture for switching to row format
when binlog_format=MIXED. It enforces the architecture where it has
to. It leaves some bugs to be fixed later. It adds extensive tests to
verify that unsafe statements work as expected and that appropriate
errors are produced by problems with the selection of binlog format.
It was not practical to split this into smaller pieces of work.
Problem 1:
To determine the logging mode, the code has to take several parameters
into account (namely: (1) the value of binlog_format; (2) the
capabilities of the engines; (3) the type of the current statement:
normal, unsafe, or row injection). These parameters may conflict in
several ways, namely:
- binlog_format=STATEMENT for a row injection
- binlog_format=STATEMENT for an unsafe statement
- binlog_format=STATEMENT for an engine only supporting row logging
- binlog_format=ROW for an engine only supporting statement logging
- statement is unsafe and engine does not support row logging
- row injection in a table that does not support statement logging
- statement modifies one table that does not support row logging and
one that does not support statement logging
Several of these conflicts were not detected, or were detected with
an inappropriate error message. The problem of BUG#39934 was that no
appropriate error message was written for the case when an engine
only supporting row logging executed a row injection with
binlog_format=ROW. However, all above cases must be handled.
Fix 1:
Introduce new error codes (sql/share/errmsg.txt). Ensure that all
conditions are detected and handled in decide_logging_format()
Problem 2:
The binlog format shall be determined once per statement, in
decide_logging_format(). It shall not be changed before or after that.
Before decide_logging_format() is called, all information necessary to
determine the logging format must be available. This principle ensures
that all unsafe statements are handled in a consistent way.
However, this principle is not followed:
thd->set_current_stmt_binlog_row_based_if_mixed() is called in several
places, including from code executing UPDATE..LIMIT,
INSERT..SELECT..LIMIT, DELETE..LIMIT, INSERT DELAYED, and
SET @@binlog_format. After Problem 1 was fixed, that caused
inconsistencies where these unsafe statements would not print the
appropriate warnings or errors for some of the conflicts.
Fix 2:
Remove calls to THD::set_current_stmt_binlog_row_based_if_mixed() from
code executed after decide_logging_format(). Compensate by calling the
set_current_stmt_unsafe() at parse time. This way, all unsafe statements
are detected by decide_logging_format().
Problem 3:
INSERT DELAYED is not unsafe: it is logged in statement format even if
binlog_format=MIXED, and no warning is printed even if
binlog_format=STATEMENT. This is BUG#45825.
Fix 3:
Made INSERT DELAYED set itself to unsafe at parse time. This allows
decide_logging_format() to detect that a warning should be printed or
the binlog_format changed.
Problem 4:
LIMIT clause were not marked as unsafe when executed inside stored
functions/triggers/views/prepared statements. This is
BUG#45785.
Fix 4:
Make statements containing the LIMIT clause marked as unsafe at
parse time, instead of at execution time. This allows propagating
unsafe-ness to the view.
The patch for WL 1563 added a new duplicate key error message so that the
key name could be provided instead of the key number. But the error code
for the new message was used even though that did not need to change.
This could cause unnecessary problems for applications that used the old
ER_DUP_ENTRY error code to detect duplicate key errors.
1)
BUG#25507 "multi-row insert delayed + auto increment causes
duplicate key entries on slave" (two concurrrent connections doing
multi-row INSERT DELAYED to insert into an auto_increment column,
caused replication slave to stop with "duplicate key error" (and
binlog was wrong), and BUG#26116 "If multi-row INSERT
DELAYED has errors, statement-based binlogging breaks" (the binlog
was not accounting for all rows inserted, or slave could stop).
The fix is that: in statement-based binlogging, a multi-row INSERT
DELAYED is silently converted to a non-delayed INSERT.
This is supposed to not affect many 5.1 users as in 5.1, the default
binlog format is "mixed", which does not have the bug (the bug is
only with binlog_format=STATEMENT).
We should document how the system delayed_insert thread decides of
its binlog format (which is not modified by this patch):
this decision is taken when the thread is created
and holds until it is terminated (is not affected by any later change
via SET GLOBAL BINLOG_FORMAT). It is also not affected by the binlog
format of the connection which issues INSERT DELAYED (this binlog
format does not affect how the row will be binlogged).
If one wants to change the binlog format of its server with SET
GLOBAL BINLOG_FORMAT, it should do FLUSH TABLES to be sure all
delayed_insert threads terminate and thus new threads are created,
taking into account the new format.
2)
BUG#24432
"INSERT... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE skips auto_increment values".
When in an INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, using
an autoincrement column, we inserted some autogenerated values and
also updated some rows, some autogenerated values were not used
(for example, even if 10 was the largest autoinc value in the table
at the start of the statement, 12 could be the first autogenerated
value inserted by the statement, instead of 11). One autogenerated
value was lost per updated row. Led to exhausting the range of the
autoincrement column faster.
Bug introduced by fix of BUG#20188; present since 5.0.24 and 5.1.12.
This bug breaks replication from a pre-5.0.24/pre-5.1.12 master.
But the present bugfix, as it makes INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE
behave like pre-5.0.24/pre-5.1.12, breaks replication from a
[5.0.24,5.0.34]/[5.1.12,5.1.15]
master to a fixed (5.0.36/5.1.16) slave! To warn users against this when
they upgrade their slave, as agreed with the support team, we add
code for a fixed slave to detect that it is connected to a buggy
master in a situation (INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE into autoinc column)
likely to break replication, in which case it cannot replicate so
stops and prints a message to the slave's error log and to SHOW SLAVE
STATUS.
For 5.0.36->[5.0.24,5.0.34] replication or 5.1.16->[5.1.12,5.1.15]
replication we cannot warn as master
does not know the slave's version (but we always recommended to users
to have slave at least as new as master).
As agreed with support, I have asked for an alert to be put into
the MySQL Network Monitoring and Advisory Service.
3) note that I'll re-enable rpl_insert_id as soon as 5.1-rpl gets
the changes from the main 5.1.
