1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-27 13:04:36 +03:00
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sven Sandberg
09c80e12c5 BUG#49978: Replication tests don't clean up replication state at the end
Major replication test framework cleanup. This does the following:
 - Ensure that all tests clean up the replication state when they
   finish, by making check-testcase check the output of SHOW SLAVE STATUS.
   This implies:
    - Slave must not be running after test finished. This is good
      because it removes the risk for sporadic errors in subsequent
      tests when a test forgets to sync correctly.
    - Slave SQL and IO errors must be cleared when test ends. This is
      good because we will notice if a test gets an unexpected error in
      the slave threads near the end.
    - We no longer have to clean up before a test starts.
 - Ensure that all tests that wait for an error in one of the slave
   threads waits for a specific error. It is no longer possible to
   source wait_for_slave_[sql|io]_to_stop.inc when there is an error
   in one of the slave threads. This is good because:
    - If a test expects an error but there is a bug that causes
      another error to happen, or if it stops the slave thread without
      an error, then we will notice.
    - When developing tests, wait_for_*_to_[start|stop].inc will fail
      immediately if there is an error in the relevant slave thread.
      Before this patch, we had to wait for the timeout.
 - Remove duplicated and repeated code for setting up unusual replication
   topologies. Now, there is a single file that is capable of setting
   up arbitrary topologies (include/rpl_init.inc, but
   include/master-slave.inc is still available for the most common
   topology). Tests can now end with include/rpl_end.inc, which will clean
   up correctly no matter what topology is used. The topology can be
   changed with include/rpl_change_topology.inc.
 - Improved debug information when tests fail. This includes:
    - debug info is printed on all servers configured by include/rpl_init.inc
    - User can set $rpl_debug=1, which makes auxiliary replication files
      print relevant debug info.
 - Improved documentation for all auxiliary replication files. Now they
   describe purpose, usage, parameters, and side effects.
 - Many small code cleanups:
    - Made have_innodb.inc output a sensible error message.
    - Moved contents of rpl000017-slave.sh into rpl000017.test
    - Added mysqltest variables that expose the current state of
      disable_warnings/enable_warnings and friends.
    - Too many to list here: see per-file comments for details.
2010-12-19 18:07:28 +01:00
Luis Soares
60ff8469a0 BUG#49522: Replication problem with mixed MyISAM/InnoDB
When using a non-transactional table (t1) on the master 
and with autocommit disabled, no COMMIT is recorded 
in the binary log ending the statement. Therefore, if 
the slave has t1 in a transactional engine, then it will 
be as if a transaction is started but never ends. This is
actually BUG#29288 all over again.

We fix this by cherrypicking the cset for BUG#29288 which
was pushed to a later mysql version. The revision picked
was: mats@sun.com-20090923094343-bnheplq8n95opjay .

Additionally, a test case for covering the scenario depicted
in the bug report is included in this cset.
2010-05-07 18:48:35 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
dbcfef4cf2 BUG#28976 Mixing trans and non-trans tables in one transaction results in incorrect
binlog

Mixing transactional (T) and non-transactional (N) tables on behalf of a
transaction may lead to inconsistencies among masters and slaves in STATEMENT
mode. The problem stems from the fact that although modifications done to
non-transactional tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible
to other connections they do not immediately get to the binary log and therefore
consistency is broken. Although there may be issues in mixing T and M tables in
STATEMENT mode, there are safe combinations that clients find useful.

In this bug, we fix the following issue. Mixing N and T tables in multi-level
(e.g. a statement that fires a trigger) or multi-table table statements (e.g.
update t1, t2...) were not handled correctly. In such cases, it was not possible
to distinguish when a T table was updated if the sequence of changes was N and T.
In a nutshell, just the flag "modified_non_trans_table" was not enough to reflect
that both a N and T tables were changed. To circumvent this issue, we check if an
engine is registered in the handler's list and changed something which means that
a T table was modified.

Check WL 2687 for a full-fledged patch that will make the use of either the MIXED or
ROW modes completely safe.
2009-08-27 00:13:03 +01:00