during creation.
Although it returns an error, consistent with the behaviour for other objects.
(Unclear why we would allow the creation of SPs with truncated names.)
1.) Added a new option to mysql_lock_tables() for ignoring FLUSH TABLES.
Used the new option in create_table_from_items().
It is necessary to prevent the SELECT table from being reopend.
It would get new storage assigned for its fields, while the
SELECT part of the command would still use the old (freed) storage.
2.) Protected the CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE ... SELECT commands
against a global read lock. This prevents a deadlock in
CREATE TABLE ... SELECT in conjunction with FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
and avoids the creation of new tables during a global read lock.
3.) Replaced set_protect_against_global_read_lock() and
unset_protect_against_global_read_lock() by
wait_if_global_read_lock() and start_waiting_global_read_lock()
in the INSERT DELAYED handling.
"the server side preparedStatement error for LIMIT placeholder",
which moves all uses of LIMIT clause from PREPARE to OPTIMIZE
and later steps.
After-review fixes.
This only showed up on two known platforms, both ia64 (one HP-UX and one Linux wich icc).
For some reason, they only get half the stack size they are supposed to have, which
makes deep SP recursion overrun the stack before check_stack_overrun() is triggered.
Also made som minor fixes in the check_stack_overrun() definition, supporting variable
margins.
No test case added, but the reason for the bug report was a failed existing test case
on these machines, which now works.
- Dont perform automatic privilege handling for stored procedures when server is started --skip-grant-tables
- Renamed view_skip_grants to skip_grants and added test cases for this
Fixed bug #8528.
Representation for single-table views was made similar to
representation for multi-table views.
view.test:
Added test case for bug #8528.
view.result:
Added test case for bug #8528. Fixed other test cases.
Approximative, because it's using our binlogging way (what we call "query"-level) and this is not as good as record-level binlog (5.1) would be. It imposes several
limitations to routines, and has caveats (which I'll document, and for which the server will try to issue errors but that is not always possible).
Reason I don't propagate caller info to the binlog as planned is that on master and slave
users may be different; even with that some caveats would remain.
