1. Fixed the name of the table to proxies_priv
2. Fixed the column names to be of the form Capitalized_lowecarse instead of
Capitalized_Capitalized
3. Added Timestamp and Grantor columns
4. Added tests to plugin_auth to check the table structure
5. Updated the existing tests
discover its existence".
The problem was that user without any privileges on
routine was able to find out whether it existed or not.
DROP FUNCTION and DROP PROCEDURE statements were
checking if routine being dropped existed and reported
ER_SP_DOES_NOT_EXIST error/warning before checking
if user had enough privileges to drop it.
This patch solves this problem by changing code not to
check if routine exists before checking if user has enough
privileges to drop it. Moreover we no longer perform this
check using a separate call instead we rely on
sp_drop_routine() returning SP_KEY_NOT_FOUND if routine
doesn't exist.
This change also simplifies one of upcoming patches
refactoring global read lock implementation.
FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible" to
be pushed as separate patch.
Replaced thread state name "Waiting for table", which was
used by threads waiting for a metadata lock or table flush,
with a set of names which better reflect types of resources
being waited for.
Also replaced "Table lock" thread state name, which was used
by threads waiting on thr_lock.c table level lock, with more
elaborate "Waiting for table level lock", to make it
more consistent with other thread state names.
Updated test cases and their results according to these
changes.
Fixed sys_vars.query_cache_wlock_invalidate_func test to not
to wait for timeout of wait_condition.inc script.
******
This patch fixes the following bugs:
- Bug#5889: Exit handler for a warning doesn't hide the warning in
trigger
- Bug#9857: Stored procedures: handler for sqlwarning ignored
- Bug#23032: Handlers declared in a SP do not handle warnings generated
in sub-SP
- Bug#36185: Incorrect precedence for warning and exception handlers
The problem was in the way warnings/errors during stored routine execution
were handled. Prior to this patch the logic was as follows:
- when a warning/an error happens: if we're executing a stored routine,
and there is a handler for that warning/error, remember the handler,
ignore the warning/error and continue execution.
- after a stored routine instruction is executed: check for a remembered
handler and activate one (if any).
This logic caused several problems:
- if one instruction generates several warnings (errors) it's impossible
to choose the right handler -- a handler for the first generated
condition was chosen and remembered for activation.
- mess with handling conditions in scopes different from the current one.
- not putting generated warnings/errors into Warning Info (Diagnostic
Area) is against The Standard.
The patch changes the logic as follows:
- Diagnostic Area is cleared on the beginning of each statement that
either is able to generate warnings, or is able to work with tables.
- at the end of a stored routine instruction, Diagnostic Area is left
intact.
- Diagnostic Area is checked after each stored routine instruction. If
an instruction generates several condition, it's now possible to take a
look at all of them and determine an appropriate handler.
The default storage engine is changed from MyISAM to
InnoDB, in all builds except for the embedded server.
In addition, the following system variables are
changed:
* innodb_file_per_table is enabled
* innodb_strict_mode is enabled
* innodb_file_format_name_update is changed
to 'Barracuda'
The test suite is changed so that tests that do not
explicitly include the have_innodb.inc are run with
--default-storage-engine=MyISAM. This is to ease the
transition, so that most regression tests are run
with the same engine as before.
Some tests are disabled for the embedded server
regression test, as the output of certain statements
will be different that for the regular server
(i.e SELECT @@default_storage_engine). This is to
ease transition.
for ALTER TABLE, LOAD DATA).
ROW_COUNT is now assigned according to the following rules:
- In my_ok():
- for DML statements: to the number of affected rows;
- for DDL statements: to 0.
- In my_eof(): to -1 to indicate that there was a result set.
We derive this semantics from the JDBC specification, where int
java.sql.Statement.getUpdateCount() is defined to (sic) "return the
current result as an update count; if the result is a ResultSet
object or there are no more results, -1 is returned".
- In my_error(): to -1 to be compatible with the MySQL C API and
MySQL ODBC driver.
- For SIGNAL statements: to 0 per WL#2110 specification. Zero is used
since that's the "default" value of ROW_COUNT in the diagnostics area.
The task is to
(a) add a comment on indexes and
(b) increase the maximum length of column, table and the new index comments.
The patch committed on behalf of Yoshinori Matsunobu (Yoshinori.Matsunobu@Sun.COM).
Fix Bug#50555 "handler commands crash server in my_hash_first()"
as a post-merge fix (the new handler tests are not passing
otherwise).
- in hash.c, don't call calc_hash if ! my_hash_inited().
- add tests and results for the test case for Bug#50555
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
