auto_increment breaks binlog":
if slave's table had a higher auto_increment counter than master's (even
though all rows of the two tables were identical), then in some cases,
REPLACE and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE failed to replicate
statement-based (it inserted different values on slave from on master).
write_record() contained a "thd->next_insert_id=0" to force an adjustment
of thd->next_insert_id after the update or replacement. But it is this
assigment introduced indeterminism of the statement on the slave, thus
the bug. For ON DUPLICATE, we replace that assignment by a call to
handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() which is deterministic
(does not depend on slave table's autoinc counter). For REPLACE, this
assignment can simply be removed (as REPLACE can't insert a number larger
than thd->next_insert_id).
We also move a too early restore_auto_increment() down to when we really know
that we can restore the value.
run at startup"
The server returned an error when trying to execute init-file with a
stored procedure that could return multiple result sets to the client.
A stored procedure can return multiple result sets if it contains
PREPARE, SELECT, SHOW and similar statements.
The fix is to set client_capabilites|=CLIENT_MULTI_RESULTS in
sql_parse.cc:handle_bootstrap(). There is no "client" really, so
nothing is ever sent. This makes init-file feature behave consistently:
the prepared statements that can be called directly in the init-file
can be used in a stored procedure too.
Re-committed the patch originally submitted by Per-Erik after review.
When compiling INSERT statements the check whether columns are provided values
depends on the flag whether a field is used in that query (Field::query_id).
However the check for updatability of VIEW columns (check_view_insertability())
was calling fix_fields() and thus setting the Field::query_id even for the
view fields that are not referenced in the current INSERT statement.
So the correct check for columns without default values
( check_that_all_fields_are_given_values() ) is assuming that all the VIEW
columns were mentioned in the INSERT field list and was issuing no
warnings or errors.
Fixed check_view_insertability() to turn off the flag whether or not to set
Field::query_id (THREAD::set_query_id) before calling fix fields and restore
it when it's done.
invoker name
The bug was fixed similar to how context switch is handled in
Item_func_sp::execute_impl(): we store pointer to current
Name_resolution_context in Item_func_current_user class, and use
its Security_context in Item_func_current_user::fix_fields().
NDB table".
SQL-layer was not marking fields which were used in triggers as such. As
result these fields were not always properly retrieved/stored by handler
layer. So one might got wrong values or lost changes in triggers for NDB,
Federated and possibly InnoDB tables.
This fix solves the problem by marking fields used in triggers
appropriately.
Also this patch contains the following cleanup of ha_ndbcluster code:
We no longer rely on reading LEX::sql_command value in handler in order
to determine if we can enable optimization which allows us to handle REPLACE
statement in more efficient way by doing replaces directly in write_row()
method without reporting error to SQL-layer.
Instead we rely on SQL-layer informing us whether this optimization
applicable by calling handler::extra() method with
HA_EXTRA_WRITE_CAN_REPLACE flag.
As result we no longer apply this optimzation in cases when it should not
be used (e.g. if we have on delete triggers on table) and use in some
additional cases when it is applicable (e.g. for LOAD DATA REPLACE).
Finally this patch includes fix for bug#20728 "REPLACE does not work
correctly for NDB table with PK and unique index".
This was yet another problem which was caused by improper field mark-up.
During row replacement fields which weren't explicity used in REPLACE
statement were not marked as fields to be saved (updated) so they have
retained values from old row version. The fix is to mark all table
fields as set for REPLACE statement. Note that in 5.1 we already solve
this problem by notifying handler that it should save values from all
fields only in case when real replacement happens.
