1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-07-17 12:02:09 +03:00
Commit Graph

923 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0d35fe6e57 MDEV-35326: Memory Leak in init_io_cache_ext upon SHUTDOWN
The problems were that:
1) resources was freed "asimetric" normal execution in send_eof,
 in case of error in destructor.
2) destructor was not called in case of SP for result objects.
(so if the last SP execution ended with error resorces was not
freeded on reinit before execution (cleanup() called before next
execution) and destructor also was not called due to lack of
delete call for the object)

Result cleanup() renamed to reset_for_next_ps_execution() to better
reflect function().

All result method revised and freeing resources made "symetric".

Destructor of result object called for SP.

Added skipped invalidation in case of error in insert.

Removed misleading naming of reset(thd) (could be mixed with
with reset()).
2025-01-13 10:04:27 +01:00
54c1031b74 MDEV-34958: after Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk insert
This bug has the same nature as the issues
  MDEV-34718: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk update
  MDEV-24411: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk insert

To fix the issue covering all use cases, resetting the thd->bulk_param
temporary to the value nullptr before invoking triggers and restoring
its original value on finishing execution of a trigger is moved to the method
  Table_triggers_list::process_triggers
that be invoked ultimately for any kind of triggers.
2024-12-13 16:19:39 +07:00
dbfee9fc2b MDEV-34348: Consolidate cmp function declarations
Partial commit of the greater MDEV-34348 scope.
MDEV-34348: MariaDB is violating clang-16 -Wcast-function-type-strict

The functions queue_compare, qsort2_cmp, and qsort_cmp2
all had similar interfaces, and were used interchangable
and unsafely cast to one another.

This patch consolidates the functions all into the
qsort_cmp2 interface.

Reviewed By:
============
Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@mariadb.com>
2024-11-23 08:14:22 -07:00
b8c2bd9f69 MDEV-35249 Fix regression caused by MDEV-34447
MDEV-34447 Removed setting first_cond_optimization to 0 in update and
delete when leaf_tables_saved. This can cause problems when two ps
executions of an update go through different paths, where the first ps
execution goes through single table update only and the second ps
execution also goes through multi table update. When this happens, the
first_cond_optimization of the outer query is not set to false during
the first ps execution because optimize() is not called for the outer
query. But then the second ps execution will call optimize() on the
outer query, which with first_cond_optimization==true trips the 2nd ps
mem leak detection.

This is not a problem in higher version as both executions go through
multi table updates, possibly due to MDEV-28883.

We fix this problem by restoring the FALSE assignments to
first_cond_optimization.
2024-10-25 18:03:40 +11:00
e886c2ba02 MDEV-34757 Check leaf_tables_saved in partition pruning in UPDATE and DELETE 2024-09-06 11:41:59 +10:00
2c3e07df47 MDEV-34447: Memory leakage is detected on running the test main.ps against the server 11.1
The memory leak happened on second execution of a prepared statement
that runs UPDATE statement with correlated subquery in right hand side of
the SET clause. In this case, invocation of the method
  table->stat_records()
could return the zero value that results in going into the 'if' branch
that handles impossible where condition. The issue is that this condition
branch missed saving of leaf tables that has to be performed as first
condition optimization activity. Later the PS statement memory root
is marked as read only on finishing first time execution of the prepared
statement. Next time the same statement is executed it hits the assertion
on attempt to allocate a memory on the PS memory root marked as read only.
This memory allocation takes place by the sequence of the following
invocations:
 Prepared_statement::execute
  mysql_execute_command
   Sql_cmd_dml::execute
    Sql_cmd_update::execute_inner
     Sql_cmd_update::update_single_table
      st_select_lex::save_leaf_tables
       List<TABLE_LIST>::push_back

To fix the issue, add the flag SELECT_LEX::leaf_tables_saved to control
whether the method SELECT_LEX::save_leaf_tables() has to be called or
it has been already invoked and no more invocation required.

Similar issue could take place on running the DELETE statement with
the LIMIT clause in PS/SP mode. The reason of memory leak is the same as for
UPDATE case and be fixed in the same way.
2024-09-06 11:41:58 +10:00
ba5482ffc2 MDEV-34718: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk update
Running an UPDATE statement in PS mode and having positional
parameter(s) bound with an array of actual values (that is
prepared to be run in bulk mode) results in incorrect behaviour
in presence of on update trigger that also executes an UPDATE
statement. The same is true for handling a DELETE statement in
presence of on delete trigger. Typically, the visible effect of
such incorrect behaviour is expressed in a wrong number of
updated/deleted rows of a target table. Additionally, in case UPDATE
statement, a number of modified rows and a state message returned
by a statement contains wrong information about a number of modified rows.

The reason for incorrect number of updated/deleted rows is that
a data structure used for binding positional argument with its
actual values is stored in THD (this is thd->bulk_param) and reused
on processing every INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement. It leads to
consuming actual values bound with top-level UPDATE/DELETE statement
by other DML statements used by triggers' body.

To fix the issue, reset the thd->bulk_param temporary to the value
nullptr before invoking triggers and restore its value on finishing
its execution.

The second part of the problem relating with wrong value of affected
rows reported by Connector/C API is caused by the fact that diagnostics
area is reused by an original DML statement and a statement invoked
by a trigger. This fact should be take into account on finalizing a
state of diagnostics area on completion running of a statement.

Important remark: in case the macros DBUG_OFF is on, call of the method
  Diagnostics_area::reset_diagnostics_area()
results in reset of the data members
  m_affected_rows, m_statement_warn_count.
Values of these data members of the class Diagnostics_area are used on
sending OK and EOF messages. In case DML statement is executed in PS bulk
mode such resetting results in sending wrong result values to a client
for affected rows in case the DML statement fires a triggers. So, reset
these data members only in case the current statement being processed
is not run in bulk mode.
2024-08-19 12:13:43 +07:00
68c1fbfc17 MDEV-25370 Update for portion changes autoincrement key in bi-temp table
According to the standard, the autoincrement column (i.e. *identity
column*) should be advanced each insert implicitly made by
UPDATE/DELETE ... FOR PORTION.

This is very unconvenient use in several notable cases. Concider a
WITHOUT OVERLAPS key with an autoinc column:
id int auto_increment, unique(id, p without overlaps)

An update or delete with FOR PORTION creates a sense that id will remain
unchanged in such case.

The standard's IDENTITY reminds MariaDB's AUTO_INCREMENT, however
the generation rules differ in many ways. For example, there's also a
notion autoincrement index, which is bound to the autoincrement field.

We will define our own generation rule for the PORTION OF operations
involving AUTO_INCREMENT:
* If an autoincrement index contains WITHOUT OVERLAPS specification, then
a new value should not be generated, otherwise it should.

Apart from WITHOUT OVERLAPS there is also another notable case, referred
by the reporter - a unique key that has an autoincrement column and a field
from the period specification:
  id int auto_increment, unique(id, s), period for p(s, e)

for this case, no exception is made, and the autoincrementing rules will be
proceeded accordung to the standard (i.e. the value will be advanced on
implicit inserts).
2024-01-31 16:03:38 +01:00
Rex
c6a9fd7904 MDEV-32212 DELETE with ORDER BY and semijoin optimization causing crash
Statements affected by this bug are delete statements that have all
these conditions

1) single table delete syntax
2) and in (sub-query) predicate
3) semi-join optimization enabled
4) an order by clause.

Semijoin optimization on an innocent looking query, such as

DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (select c2 from t2) ORDER BY c1;

turns it from a single table delete to a multi-table delete.

During multi_delete::initialize_tables for the top level join object, a
table is initialized missing a keep_current_rowid flag, needed to
position a handler for removal of the correct row after the filesort
structure has been built.

Fix provided by Monty (monty@mariadb.com)
Pushed into 10.5 at Monty's request.
Applicable to 10.6, 10.11, 11.0.
OK'd by Monty in slack:#askmonty 2023-12-01
2023-12-01 09:29:36 +12:00
ac5a534a4c Merge remote-tracking branch '10.4' into 10.5 2023-03-31 21:32:41 +02:00
f33fc2fae5 MDEV-30539 EXPLAIN EXTENDED: no message with queries for DML statements
EXPLAIN EXTENDED for an UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT/REPLACE statement did not
produce the warning containing the text representation of the query
obtained after the optimization phase. Such warning was produced for
SELECT statements, but not for DML statements.
The patch fixes this defect of EXPLAIN EXTENDED for DML statements.
2023-03-25 12:36:59 -07:00
4eb8e51c26 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-11-30 13:10:52 +02:00
da03d8d99f MDEV-19190 Assertion ...auto_inc_initialized failed in get_auto_increment
This is a DELETE only case. Normally this statement doesn't make inserts,
but DELETE ... FOR PORTION changes it. UPDATE and INSERT initializes
autoinc by calling handler::info(HA_STATUS_AUTO). Also myisam and innodb
can lazily initialize it in their update_create_info overrides.

The solution is to initialize autoinc during delete preparation,
if period (DELETE FOR PORTION) is specified.

The initial work has been done by Kento Takeuchi by his PR #2048,
however this commit also holds a few technical modifications by
Nikita Malyavin
2022-11-24 02:05:53 +03:00
1e71ea806b Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2022-08-04 08:30:03 +02:00
e509065247 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2022-08-03 19:51:44 +02:00
f9ec9b6abb MDEV-27282 InnoDB: Failing assertion: !query->intersection
- query->intersection fails to get freed if the query exceeds
innodb_ft_result_cache_limit

- errors from init_ftfuncs were not propogated by delete command

This is taken from percona/percona-server@ef2c0bcb9a
2022-08-03 20:35:12 +05:30
e1246775a9 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-03-15 08:32:28 +02:00
9c6135e81f Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-03-15 08:10:35 +02:00
6789f2cfab MDEV-18304 sql_safe_updates does not work with OR clauses
not every index-using plan sets bits in table->quick_keys.
QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT, for example, doesn't.

Use the fact that select->quick is set instead.

Also allow EXPLAIN to work.
2022-03-12 19:13:17 +01:00
7e2b42324c Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-09-24 08:42:23 +03:00
9024498e88 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-09-22 18:26:54 +03:00
9fc1ef932f MDEV-26545 Spider does not correctly handle UDF and stored function in where conds
- Handle stored function conditions correctly, with the same logic as with UDFs.
- When running queries on Spider SE, by default, we do not push down WHERE conditions containing usage of UDFs/stored functions to remote data nodes, unless the user demands (by setting spider_use_pushdown_udf).
- Disable direct update/delete when a udf condition is skipped.
2021-09-22 18:55:05 +09:00
a7d880f0b0 MDEV-21916: COM_STMT_BULK_EXECUTE with RETURNING insert wrong values
The problem is that array binding uses net buffer to read parameters for each
execution while each execiting with RETURNING write in the same buffer.

Solution is to allocate new net buffer to avoid changing buffer we are reading
from.
2021-07-15 16:28:13 +02:00
9c7a456a92 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-06-01 10:38:09 +03:00
77d8da57d7 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-06-01 09:14:59 +03:00
950a220060 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2021-06-01 08:40:59 +03:00
91bde0fb67 MDEV-25576: The statement EXPLAIN running as regular statement and as prepared statement produces different results for UPDATE with subquery
Both EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN EXTENDED statements produce different results set
in case it is run in normal way and in PS mode for the statements
UPDATE/DELETE with subquery.

The use case below reproduces the issue:
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT KEY) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,128 sec)

MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,023 sec)

MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t3 (c3 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,021 sec)

MariaDB [test]> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
    -> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
    -> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
    -> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id   | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                          |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
|    1 | PRIMARY     | t3    | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    0 |   100.00 |                                |
|    2 | SUBQUERY    | NULL  | NULL | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL | NULL |     NULL | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,002 sec)

MariaDB [test]> PREPARE stmt FROM
    -> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
    -> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
    -> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
    -> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,000 sec)
Statement prepared

MariaDB [test]>  EXECUTE stmt;
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id   | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                          |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
|    1 | PRIMARY     | t3    | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    0 |   100.00 |                                |
|    2 | SUBQUERY    | NULL  | NULL | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL | NULL |     NULL | no matching row in const table |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,000 sec)

The reason by that different result sets are produced is that on execution
of the statement 'EXECUTE stmt' the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE not set
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for instances of SELECT_LEX that
correspond to subqueries used in the UPDTAE/DELETE statements.

Initially, these flags were set on parsing the statement
  PREPARE stmt FROM "EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET ..."
but latter they were reset before starting real execution of
the parsed query during handling the statement 'EXECUTE stmt';

So, to fix the issue the functions mysql_update()/mysql_delete()
have been modified to set the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE forcibly
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for the primary SELECT_LEX
of the UPDATE/DELETE statement.
2021-05-30 17:31:55 +07:00
4725792bf3 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-04-25 12:04:45 +03:00
e4394cc547 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-04-25 10:20:57 +03:00
2c9bf0ae87 This commit adds the same call of st_select_lex::set_unique_exclude() that
complemented the fix for MDEV-24823 in 10.2. As it is the only call of
this function in 10.3 the commit also has added the code of the function.
2021-04-24 16:53:24 -07:00
1288dfffe7 This patch complements the patch for MDEV-24823. 2021-04-23 14:32:59 -07:00
e3a25793be MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 20:02:08 -07:00
b3b5d57e78 MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 13:56:50 -07:00
02e7bff882 Merge commit '10.4' into 10.5 2021-01-06 10:53:00 +01:00
0aa02567dd Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2020-12-23 14:52:59 +02:00
932ec586aa MDEV-23644 Assertion on evaluating foreign referential action for self-reference in system versioned table
First part of the fix (row0mysql.cc) addresses external columns when adding history
row on referential action. The full data must be retrieved before the
row is inserted.

Second part of the fix (the rest) avoids duplicate primary key error between
the history row generated on referential action and the history row
generated by SQL command. Both command and referential action can
happen on same table since foreign key can be self-reference (parent
and child tables are same). Moreover, the self-reference can refer
multiple rows when the key is non-unique. In such case history is
generated by referential action occured on first row but processed all
rows by a matched key. The second round is when the next row is
processed by a command but history already exists. In such case we
check TRX_ID of existing history row and if it is the same we assume
the above situation and skip adding one more history row or failing
the command.
2020-12-22 03:33:53 +03:00
6a1e655cb0 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2020-12-02 18:29:49 +02:00
589cf8dbf3 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2020-12-01 19:51:14 +02:00
1657b7a583 Merge 10.4 to 10.5 2020-10-22 17:08:49 +03:00
5896a49820 MDEV-19130 Assertion failed in handler::update_auto_increment
add store/restore_auto_increment in period portion insert/update functions
2020-10-14 21:57:58 +10:00
6cee9b1953 MDEV-22535 TABLE::initialize_quick_structures() takes 0.5% in oltp_read_only
Fixed by:
- Make all quick_* variable allocated according to real number keys instead
  of MAX_KEY
- Store all the quick* items in separated allocated structure (OPT_RANGE)
- Ensure we don't access any quick* variable without first checking
  opt_range_keys.is_set().  Thanks to this, we don't need any
  pre-initialization of quick* variables anymore.

Some renames was done to use the new structure:
table->quick_keys                -> table->opt_range_keys
table->quick_rows[X]             -> table->opt_range[X].rows
table->quick_key_parts[X]        -> table->opt_range[X].key_parts
table->quick_costs[X]            -> table->opt_range[X].cost
table->quick_index_only_costs[X] -> table->opt_range[X].index_only_cost
table->quick_n_ranges[X]         -> table->opt_range[X].ranges
table->quick_condition_rows      -> table->opt_range_condition_rows

This patch should both decrease memory needed for TABLE objects
(3528 -> 984 + keyinfo) and increase performance, thanks to less
initializations per query, and more localized memory, thanks to the
opt_range structure.
2020-07-02 16:59:14 +03:00
4102f1589c Aria will now register it's transactions
MDEV-22531 Remove maria::implicit_commit()
MDEV-22607 Assertion `ha_info->ht() != binlog_hton' failed in
           MYSQL_BIN_LOG::unlog_xa_prepare

From the handler point of view, Aria now looks like a transactional
engine. One effect of this is that we don't need to call
maria::implicit_commit() anymore.

This change also forces the server to call trans_commit_stmt() after doing
any read or writes to system tables.  This work will also make it easier
to later allow users to have system tables in other engines than Aria.

To handle the case that Aria doesn't support rollback, a new
handlerton flag, HTON_NO_ROLLBACK, was added to engines that has
transactions without rollback (for the moment only binlog and Aria).

Other things
- Moved freeing of MARIA_SHARE to a separate function as the MARIA_SHARE
  can be still part of a transaction even if the table has closed.
- Changed Aria checkpoint to use the new MARIA_SHARE free function. This
  fixes a possible memory leak when using S3 tables
- Changed testing of binlog_hton to instead test for HTON_NO_ROLLBACK
- Removed checking of has_transaction_manager() in handler.cc as we can
  assume that as the transaction was started by the engine, it does
  support transactions.
- Added new class 'start_new_trans' that can be used to start indepdendent
  sub transactions, for example while reading mysql.proc, using help or
  status tables etc.
- open_system_tables...() and open_proc_table_for_Read() doesn't anymore
  take a Open_tables_backup list. This is now handled by 'start_new_trans'.
- Split thd::has_transactions() to thd::has_transactions() and
  thd::has_transactions_and_rollback()
- Added handlerton code to free cached transactions objects.
  Needed by InnoDB.

squash! 2ed35999f2a2d84f1c786a21ade5db716b6f1bbc
2020-05-23 12:29:10 +03:00
d1d472646d Change THD->transaction to a pointer to enable multiple transactions
All changes (except one) is of type
thd->transaction.  -> thd->transaction->

thd->transaction points by default to 'thd->default_transaction'
This allows us to 'easily' have multiple active transactions for a
THD object, like when reading data from the mysql.proc table
2020-05-23 12:29:10 +03:00
937dfb74cb MDEV-22424 Server crashes in handler::check_duplicate_long_entry_key or Assertion `inited == NONE || lookup_handler != this' failed upon DELETE FOR PORTION on table with long unique key
even if we're *allowed to* convert DELETE .. FOR PERIOD OF
into an update internally, doesn't think we'll *be able to*.

We always have to prepare for insert.
2020-05-05 19:41:12 +02:00
e3130d22e1 Fixed some assert crashes related to keyread.
- MDEV-22062 Assertion `!table->file->keyread_enabled()' failed in
  close_thread_table()
- MDEV-22077 table->no_keyread .. failed in join_read_first()
- MDEV-22237 Assertion `!table->file->keyread_enabled()' failed in
  handler::ha_reset on DELETE
2020-04-19 17:33:51 +03:00
fcd84da5f1 MDEV-22218 InnoDB: Failing assertion: node->pcur->rel_pos == BTR_PCUR_ON upon LOAD DATA with NO_BACKSLASH_ESCAPES in SQL_MODE and unique blob in table
`inited == NONE` at the initialization time does not always mean
that it'll be `NONE` later, at the execution time. Use a more complex
caller-specific logic to decide whether to create a cloned lookup handler.

Besides LOAD (as in the original bug report) make sure that all
prepare_for_insert() invocations are covered by tests. Add tests for
CREATE ... SELECT, multi-UPDATE, and multi-DELETE.

Don't enable write cache with long uniques.
2020-04-12 22:10:57 +02:00
0515577d12 cleanup: prepare "update_handler" for WITHOUT OVERLAPS
* rename to a generic name
* move remaning initializations from query exec to prepare time
* simplify/unify key handling in open_table_from_share and delayed
* remove dead code
* move tests where they belong
2020-03-31 17:42:34 +02:00
4ef437558a Improve update handler (long unique keys on blobs)
MDEV-21606 Improve update handler (long unique keys on blobs)
MDEV-21470 MyISAM and Aria start_bulk_insert doesn't work with long unique
MDEV-21606 Bug fix for previous version of this code
MDEV-21819 2 Assertion `inited == NONE || update_handler != this'

- Move update_handler from TABLE to handler
- Move out initialization of update handler from ha_write_row() to
  prepare_for_insert()
- Fixed that INSERT DELAYED works with update handler
- Give an error if using long unique with an autoincrement column
- Added handler function to check if table has long unique hash indexes
- Disable write cache in MyISAM and Aria when using update_handler as
  if cache is used, the row will not be inserted until end of statement
  and update_handler would not find conflicting rows.
- Removed not used handler argument from
  check_duplicate_long_entries_update()
- Syntax cleanups
  - Indentation fixes
  - Don't use single character indentifiers for arguments
2020-03-24 21:00:02 +02:00
a1e330de5a MDEV-21743 Split up SUPER privilege to smaller privileges 2020-03-10 23:49:47 +04:00
28c89b7151 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2019-12-16 07:47:17 +02:00