If two high priority threads have lock conflict, we look at the
order of these transactions and honor the earlier transaction.
for_locking parameter in lock_rec_has_to_wait() has become
obsolete and it is now removed from the code .
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
The rather recent thd_need_ordering_with() function does not take
high priority transactions' order in consideration. Chaged this
funtion to compare also transaction seqnos and favor earlier transaction.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
when assigning the cached item to the Item_cache for the first time
make sure to use Item_cache::setup(), not Item_cache::store().
Because the former copies the metadata (and allocates memory, in case
of Item_cache_row), and Item_cache::decimal must be set for
comparisons to work correctly.
The problem is that if table definition cache (TDC) is full of real tables
which are in tables cache, view definition can not stay there so will be
removed by its own underlying tables.
In situation above old mechanism of detection matching definition in PS
and current version always require reprepare and so prevent executing
the PS.
One work around is to increase TDC, other - improve version check for
views/triggers (which is done here). Now in suspicious cases we check:
- timestamp (microseconds) of the view to be sure that version really
have changed;
- time (microseconds) of creation of a trigger related to time
(microseconds) of statement preparation.
thd_get_ha_data() can be used without a lock, but only from the
current thd thread, when calling from anoher thread it *must*
be protected by thd->LOCK_thd_data
* fix group commit code to take thd->LOCK_thd_data
* remove innobase_close_connection() from the innodb background thread,
it's not needed after 87775402cd and was failing the assert with
current_thd==0
This is a 10.5 version of 9b750dcbd8, fix for
MDEV-23536 Race condition between KILL and transaction commit
InnoDB needs to remove trx from thd before destroying it (trx), otherwise
a concurrent KILL might get a pointer from thd to a destroyed trx.
ha_close_connection() should allow engines to clear ha_data in
hton->on close_connection(). To prevent the engine from being unloaded
while hton->close_connection() is running, we remove the lock from
ha_data and unlock the plugin manually.
In commit 28325b0863
a compile-time option was introduced to disable the macros
DBUG_ENTER and DBUG_RETURN or DBUG_VOID_RETURN.
The parameter name WITH_DBUG_TRACE would hint that it also
covers DBUG_PRINT statements. Let us do that: WITH_DBUG_TRACE=OFF
shall disable DBUG_PRINT() as well.
A few InnoDB recovery tests used to check that some output from
DBUG_PRINT("ib_log", ...) is present. We can live without those checks.
Reviewed by: Vladislav Vaintroub
Making changes to wsrep_mysqld.h causes large parts of server code to
be recompiled. The reason is that wsrep_mysqld.h is included by
sql_class.h, even tough very little of wsrep_mysqld.h is needed in
sql_class.h. This commit introduces a new header file, wsrep_on.h,
which is meant to be included from sql_class.h, and contains only
macros and variable declarations used to determine whether wsrep is
enabled.
Also, header wsrep.h should only contain definitions that are also
used outside of sql/. Therefore, move WSREP_TO_ISOLATION* and
WSREP_SYNC_WAIT macros to wsrep_mysqld.h.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
TIMESTAMP columns were compared as strings in ALL/ANY comparison,
which did not work well near DST time change.
Changing ALL/ANY comparison to use "Native" representation to compare
TIMESTAMP columns, like simple comparison does.
MDEV-21810 MBR: Unexpected "Unsafe statement" warning for unsafe IODKU
MDEV-17614 fixes to replication unsafety for INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE
on two or more unique key table left a flaw. The fixes checked the
safety condition per each inserted record with the idea to catch a user-created
value to an autoincrement column and when that succeeds the autoincrement column
would become the source of unsafety too.
It was not expected that after a duplicate error the next record's
write_set may become different and the unsafe decision for that
specific record will be computed to screw the Query's binlogging
state and when @@binlog_format is MIXED nothing gets bin-logged.
This case has been already fixed in 10.5.2 by 91ab42a823 that
relocated/optimized THD::decide_logging_format_low() out of the record insert
loop. The safety decision is computed once and at the right time.
Pertinent parts of the commit are cherry-picked.
Also a spurious warning about unsafety is removed when MIXED
@@binlog_format; original MDEV-17614 test result corrected.
The original test of MDEV-17614 is extended and made more readable.
Problem:
========
If a primary is shutdown during an active semi-sync connection
during the period when the primary is awaiting an ACK, the primary
hard kills the active communication thread and does not ensure the
transaction was received by a replica. This can lead to an
inconsistent replication state.
Solution:
========
During shutdown, the primary should wait for an ACK or timeout
before hard killing a thread which is awaiting a communication. We
extend the `SHUTDOWN WAIT FOR SLAVES` logic to identify and ignore
any threads waiting for a semi-sync ACK in phase 1. Then, before
stopping the ack receiver thread, the shutdown is delayed until all
waiting semi-sync connections receive an ACK or time out. The
connections are then killed in phase 2.
Notes:
1) There remains an unresolved corner case that affects this
patch. MDEV-28141: Slave crashes with Packets out of order when
connecting to a shutting down master. Specifically, If a slave is
connecting to a master which is actively shutting down, the slave
can crash with a "Packets out of order" assertion error. To get
around this issue in the MTR tests, the primary will wait a small
amount of time before phase 1 killing threads to let the replicas
safely stop (if applicable).
2) This patch also fixes MDEV-28114: Semi-sync Master ACK Receiver
Thread Can Error on COM_QUIT
Reviewed By
============
Andrei Elkin <andrei.elkin@mariadb.com>
Handling BF abort for prepared statement execution so that EXECUTE processing will continue
until parameter setup is complete, before BF abort bails out the statement execution.
THD class has new boolean member: wsrep_delayed_BF_abort, which is set if BF abort is observed
in do_command() right after reading client's packet, and if the client has sent PS execute command.
In such case, the deadlock error is not returned immediately back to client, but the PS execution
will be started. However, the PS execution loop, will now check if wsrep_delayed_BF_abort is set, and
stop the PS execution after the type information has been assigned for the PS.
With this, the PS protocol type information, which is present in the first PS EXECUTE command, is not lost
even if the first PS EXECUTE command was marked to abort.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
extra2_read_len resolved by keeping the implementation
in sql/table.cc by exposed it for use by ha_partition.cc
Remove identical implementation in unireg.h
(ref: bfed2c7d57)
Problem:
Parse-time conversion from binary to tricky character sets like utf32
produced ill-formed strings. So, later a chash happened in debug builds,
or a wrong SHOW CREATE TABLE was returned in release builds.
Fix:
1. Backporting a few methods from 10.3:
- THD::check_string_for_wellformedness()
- THD::convert_string() overloads
- THD::make_text_string_connection()
2. Adding a new method THD::reinterpret_string_from_binary(),
which makes sure to either returns a well-formed string
(optionally prepending with zero bytes), or returns an error.
The first step for deprecating innodb_autoinc_lock_mode(see MDEV-27844) is:
- to switch statement binlog format to ROW if binlog format is MIXED and
the statement changes autoincremented fields
- issue warnings if innodb_autoinc_lock_mode == 2 and binlog format is
STATEMENT
The warning out of OPTIMIZE
Statement is unsafe because it uses a system function
was indeed counterfactual and was resulted by checking an
insufficiently strict property of lex' sql_command_flags.
Fixed with deploying an additional checking of weather
the current sql command that modifes a share->non_determinstic_insert
table is capable of generating ROW format events.
The extra check rules out the unsafety to OPTIMIZE et al, while the
existing check continues to do so to CREATE TABLE (which is
perculiarly tagged as ROW-event generative sql command).
As a side effect sql_sequence.binlog test gets corrected and
binlog_stm_unsafe_warning.test is reinforced to add up
an unsafe CREATE..SELECT test.
GCC 12 complains if a reference to an uninitialized object is
being passed to a constructor. The mysql_mutex_t, mysql_cond_t
would be initialized in the constructor body, which is executed
after the initializer list. There is no problem passing a pointer
instead of a reference. The wrapper classes do not dereference
the pointers in the constructor or destructor, so there does not
appear to be any correctness issue.
Mutex order violation when wsrep bf thread kills a conflicting trx,
the stack is
wsrep_thd_LOCK()
wsrep_kill_victim()
lock_rec_other_has_conflicting()
lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock()
row_search_mvcc()
ha_innobase::index_read()
ha_innobase::rnd_pos()
handler::ha_rnd_pos()
handler::rnd_pos_by_record()
handler::ha_rnd_pos_by_record()
Rows_log_event::find_row()
Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event()
Log_event::apply_event()
wsrep_apply_events()
and mutexes are taken in the order
lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex -> victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data
When a normal KILL statement is executed, the stack is
innobase_kill_query()
kill_handlerton()
plugin_foreach_with_mask()
ha_kill_query()
THD::awake()
kill_one_thread()
and mutexes are
victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data -> lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex
This patch is the plan D variant for fixing potetial mutex locking
order exercised by BF aborting and KILL command execution.
In this approach, KILL command is replicated as TOI operation.
This guarantees total isolation for the KILL command execution
in the first node: there is no concurrent replication applying
and no concurrent DDL executing. Therefore there is no risk of
BF aborting to happen in parallel with KILL command execution
either. Potential mutex deadlocks between the different mutex
access paths with KILL command execution and BF aborting cannot
therefore happen.
TOI replication is used, in this approach, purely as means
to provide isolated KILL command execution in the first node.
KILL command should not (and must not) be applied in secondary
nodes. In this patch, we make this sure by skipping KILL
execution in secondary nodes, in applying phase, where we
bail out if applier thread is trying to execute KILL command.
This is effective, but skipping the applying of KILL command
could happen much earlier as well.
This also fixed unprotected calls to wsrep_thd_abort
that will use wsrep_abort_transaction. This is fixed
by holding THD::LOCK_thd_data while we abort transaction.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
Mutex order violation when wsrep bf thread kills a conflicting trx,
the stack is
wsrep_thd_LOCK()
wsrep_kill_victim()
lock_rec_other_has_conflicting()
lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock()
row_search_mvcc()
ha_innobase::index_read()
ha_innobase::rnd_pos()
handler::ha_rnd_pos()
handler::rnd_pos_by_record()
handler::ha_rnd_pos_by_record()
Rows_log_event::find_row()
Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event()
Log_event::apply_event()
wsrep_apply_events()
and mutexes are taken in the order
lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex -> victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data
When a normal KILL statement is executed, the stack is
innobase_kill_query()
kill_handlerton()
plugin_foreach_with_mask()
ha_kill_query()
THD::awake()
kill_one_thread()
and mutexes are
victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data -> lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex
This patch is the plan D variant for fixing potetial mutex locking
order exercised by BF aborting and KILL command execution.
In this approach, KILL command is replicated as TOI operation.
This guarantees total isolation for the KILL command execution
in the first node: there is no concurrent replication applying
and no concurrent DDL executing. Therefore there is no risk of
BF aborting to happen in parallel with KILL command execution
either. Potential mutex deadlocks between the different mutex
access paths with KILL command execution and BF aborting cannot
therefore happen.
TOI replication is used, in this approach, purely as means
to provide isolated KILL command execution in the first node.
KILL command should not (and must not) be applied in secondary
nodes. In this patch, we make this sure by skipping KILL
execution in secondary nodes, in applying phase, where we
bail out if applier thread is trying to execute KILL command.
This is effective, but skipping the applying of KILL command
could happen much earlier as well.
This also fixed unprotected calls to wsrep_thd_abort
that will use wsrep_abort_transaction. This is fixed
by holding THD::LOCK_thd_data while we abort transaction.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
Mutex order violation when wsrep bf thread kills a conflicting trx,
the stack is
wsrep_thd_LOCK()
wsrep_kill_victim()
lock_rec_other_has_conflicting()
lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock()
row_search_mvcc()
ha_innobase::index_read()
ha_innobase::rnd_pos()
handler::ha_rnd_pos()
handler::rnd_pos_by_record()
handler::ha_rnd_pos_by_record()
Rows_log_event::find_row()
Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event()
Log_event::apply_event()
wsrep_apply_events()
and mutexes are taken in the order
lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex -> victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data
When a normal KILL statement is executed, the stack is
innobase_kill_query()
kill_handlerton()
plugin_foreach_with_mask()
ha_kill_query()
THD::awake()
kill_one_thread()
and mutexes are
victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data -> lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex
This patch is the plan D variant for fixing potetial mutex locking
order exercised by BF aborting and KILL command execution.
In this approach, KILL command is replicated as TOI operation.
This guarantees total isolation for the KILL command execution
in the first node: there is no concurrent replication applying
and no concurrent DDL executing. Therefore there is no risk of
BF aborting to happen in parallel with KILL command execution
either. Potential mutex deadlocks between the different mutex
access paths with KILL command execution and BF aborting cannot
therefore happen.
TOI replication is used, in this approach, purely as means
to provide isolated KILL command execution in the first node.
KILL command should not (and must not) be applied in secondary
nodes. In this patch, we make this sure by skipping KILL
execution in secondary nodes, in applying phase, where we
bail out if applier thread is trying to execute KILL command.
This is effective, but skipping the applying of KILL command
could happen much earlier as well.
This also fixed unprotected calls to wsrep_thd_abort
that will use wsrep_abort_transaction. This is fixed
by holding THD::LOCK_thd_data while we abort transaction.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
Mutex order violation when wsrep bf thread kills a conflicting trx,
the stack is
wsrep_thd_LOCK()
wsrep_kill_victim()
lock_rec_other_has_conflicting()
lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock()
row_search_mvcc()
ha_innobase::index_read()
ha_innobase::rnd_pos()
handler::ha_rnd_pos()
handler::rnd_pos_by_record()
handler::ha_rnd_pos_by_record()
Rows_log_event::find_row()
Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event()
Log_event::apply_event()
wsrep_apply_events()
and mutexes are taken in the order
lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex -> victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data
When a normal KILL statement is executed, the stack is
innobase_kill_query()
kill_handlerton()
plugin_foreach_with_mask()
ha_kill_query()
THD::awake()
kill_one_thread()
and mutexes are
victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data -> lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex
This patch is the plan D variant for fixing potetial mutex locking
order exercised by BF aborting and KILL command execution.
In this approach, KILL command is replicated as TOI operation.
This guarantees total isolation for the KILL command execution
in the first node: there is no concurrent replication applying
and no concurrent DDL executing. Therefore there is no risk of
BF aborting to happen in parallel with KILL command execution
either. Potential mutex deadlocks between the different mutex
access paths with KILL command execution and BF aborting cannot
therefore happen.
TOI replication is used, in this approach, purely as means
to provide isolated KILL command execution in the first node.
KILL command should not (and must not) be applied in secondary
nodes. In this patch, we make this sure by skipping KILL
execution in secondary nodes, in applying phase, where we
bail out if applier thread is trying to execute KILL command.
This is effective, but skipping the applying of KILL command
could happen much earlier as well.
This also fixed unprotected calls to wsrep_thd_abort
that will use wsrep_abort_transaction. This is fixed
by holding THD::LOCK_thd_data while we abort transaction.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
