1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-05-07 04:01:59 +03:00

314 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mattias Jonsson
6d483cf3ab post-push fix for bug#17565888/bug#14621190 2013-10-28 17:08:31 +01:00
Mattias Jonsson
20f579ea16 Bug#17565888: UP TO 75% INCREASE IN DBT3 QUERY (Q7) EXECUTION TIME
Regression from bug#14621190 due to disabled optimistic restoration
of cursor, which required full key lookup instead of verifying
if previously positioned btree cursor could be reused.

Fixed by enable optimistic restore and adjust cursor afterward.

rb#3324 approved by Marko.
2013-10-18 19:25:59 +02:00
Mattias Jonsson
6ca4be9c03 Bug#14621190: HA_INNOBASE::INDEX_NEXT SKIPS A RECORD IF PREVIOUS
INDEX_READ_MAP HAD NO MATCH

If index_read_map is called for exact search and no matching records
exists it will position the cursor on the next record, but still having the
relative position to BTR_PCUR_ON.
This will make a call for index_next to read yet another next record,
instead of returning the record the cursor points to.

Fixed by setting pcur->rel_pos = BTR_PCUR_BEFORE if an exact
[prefix] search is done, but failed.

Also avoids optimistic restoration if rel_pos != BTR_PCUR_ON,
since btr_cur may be different than old_rec.

rb#3324, approved by Marko and Jimmy
2013-10-01 10:05:45 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
553988a26e Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-16 15:49:13 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
fb2a2d2562 Bug#17312846 CHECK TABLE ASSERTION FAILURE
DICT_TABLE_GET_FORMAT(CLUST_INDEX->TABLE) >= 1

The function row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec() was incorrectly
preparing to compare a NULL column prefix in a secondary index with a
non-NULL column in a clustered index.

This can trigger an assertion failure in 5.1 plugin and later. In the
built-in InnoDB of MySQL 5.1 and earlier, we would apparently only do
some extra work, by trimming the clustered index field for the
comparison.

The code might actually have worked properly apart from this debug
assertion failure. It is merely doing some extra work in fetching a
BLOB column, and then comparing it to NULL (which would return the
same result, no matter what the BLOB contents is).

While the test case involves CHECK TABLE, this could theoretically
occur during any read that uses a secondary index on a column prefix
of a column that can be NULL.

rb#3101 approved by Mattias Jonsson
2013-08-16 15:45:41 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
49ffda0969 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-15 15:34:12 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
318096074e Bug#17302896 DOUBLE PURGE ON ROLLBACK OF UPDATING A DELETE-MARKED RECORD
There was a race condition in the rollback of TRX_UNDO_UPD_DEL_REC.

Once row_undo_mod_clust() has rolled back the changes by the rolling-back
transaction, it attempts to purge the delete-marked record, if possible, in a
separate mini-transaction.

However, row_undo_mod_remove_clust_low() fails to check if the DB_TRX_ID of
the record that it found after repositioning the cursor, is still the same.
If it is not, it means that the record was purged and another record was
inserted in its place.

So, the rollback would have performed an incorrect purge, breaking the
locking rules and causing corruption.

The problem was found by creating a table that contains a unique
secondary index and a primary key, and two threads running REPLACE
with only one value for the unique column, so that the uniqueness
constraint would be violated all the time, leading to statement
rollback.

This bug exists in all InnoDB versions (I checked MySQL 3.23.53).
It has become easier to repeat in 5.5 and 5.6 thanks to scalability
improvements and a dedicated purge thread.

rb#3085 approved by Jimmy Yang
2013-08-15 15:23:23 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
60e1a532e5 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-14 10:24:36 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
b89e6ccfc4 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-07-25 15:31:06 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
a1ccfcf84d Bug #17076737 DUPLICATE CONSTRAINTS DISPLAYED WHEN NAME INCLUDES "_IBFK_"
Problem:

When the user specified foreign key name contains "_ibfk_", InnoDB wrongly
tries to rename it. 

Solution:

When a table is renamed, all its associated foreign keys will also be renamed,
only if the foreign key names are automatically generated.  If the foreign key
names are given by the user, even if it has _ibfk_ in it, it must not be
renamed.

rb#2935 approved by Jimmy, Krunal and Satya
2013-07-25 14:53:23 +05:30
unknown
3684c2b182 Bug 16876388 - PLEASE BACKPORT BUG#16208542 TO 5.5
Straight forward backport.

Approved by Jimmy, rb#2656
2013-06-25 09:42:54 +08:00
Murthy Narkedimilli
b292b5d2e3 Fixing the bug 16919882 - WRONG FSF ADDRESS IN LICENSES HEADERS 2013-06-10 22:29:41 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
1b26d59192 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-05-06 19:57:49 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
bf7325bb6b Bug #16722314 FOREIGN KEY ID MODIFIED DURING EXPORT
Bug #16754901 PARS_INFO_FREE NOT CALLED IN DICT_CREATE_ADD_FOREIGN_TO_DICTIONARY

Problem:

There are two situations here.  The constraint name is explicitly
given by the user and the constraint name is automatically generated
by InnoDB.  In the case of generated constraint name, it is formed by
adding table name as prefix.  The table names are stored internally in
my_charset_filename.  In the case of constraint name explicitly given
by the user, it is stored in UTF8 format itself.  So, in some
situations the constraint name is in utf8 and in some situations it is
in my_charset_filename format.  Hence this problem.

Solution:

Always store the foreign key constraint name in UTF-8 even when
automatically generated.

Bug #16754901 PARS_INFO_FREE NOT CALLED IN DICT_CREATE_ADD_FOREIGN_TO_DICTIONARY

Problem:

There was a memory leak in the function dict_create_add_foreign_to_dictionary().
The allocated pars_info_t object is not freed in the error code path.

Solution:

Allocate the pars_info_t object after the error checking.

rb#2368 in review
2013-05-06 16:28:56 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
57059380b5 Fix Bug#16400412 UNNECESSARY DICT_UPDATE_STATISTICS DURING CONCURRENT
UPDATES

After checking that the table has changed too much in
row_update_statistics_if_needed() and calling dict_update_statistics(),
also check if the same condition holds after acquiring the table stats
latch. This is to avoid multiple threads concurrently entering and
executing the stats update code.

Approved by:	Marko (rb:2186)
2013-03-18 17:20:30 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
775dbed9d0 Bug #16133801 UNEXPLAINABLE INNODB UNIQUE INDEX LOCKS ON DELETE +
INSERT WITH SAME VALUES

Problem:

When a transaction is in READ COMMITTED isolation level, gap locks are still
taken in the secondary index, when row is inserted.  This happens when the
secondary index is scanned for duplicate.  

The function row_ins_scan_sec_index_for_duplicate() always calls the 
function row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock() with LOCK_ORDINARY irrespective of
the transaction isolation level.

Solution:

The function row_ins_scan_sec_index_for_duplicate() calls the 
function row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock() with LOCK_ORDINARY or 
LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP based on the transaction isolation level.

rb://2035 approved by Krunal and Marko
2013-03-06 11:49:57 +05:30
unknown
e1e43631f8 Bug #16305265 HANG IN RENAME TABLE
This is a deadlock that will also be fixed in the server by
Bug #11844915 - HANG IN THDVAR MUTEX ACQUISITION.
So this is a simple alternate method of fixing the same problem,
but from within InnoDB.

The simple change is to make rename table start a transaction
before locking dict_sys->mutex since thd_supports_xa() can call
THDVAR which can lock a mutex, LOCK_global_system_variables, that
is used in the server by many other activities.  At least one of
those, sys_var::update(), can call back into InnoDB and try to
lock dict_sys->mutex while holding LOCK_global_system_variables.

The other bug fix for 11844915 eliminates the use of
LOCK_global_system_variables for calls to THDVAR.

Approved by marko in http://rb.no.oracle.com/rb/r/2000/
2013-02-27 12:44:58 -06:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
07f6a96b59 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-01-14 10:57:04 +05:30
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
54c47527e2 - BUG#1608883: KILLING A QUERY INSIDE INNODB CAUSES IT TO EVENTUALLY CRASH
WITH AN ASSERTION

  Recently we added check to handle kill query signal for long operating
  queries. 
  While the query interruption is reported it must to ensure cursor is restore
  to proper state for HANDLER interface to work correctly. 
  Normal select query will not face this problem, as on recieving interrupt,
  select query is aborted and new select query result in re-initialization
  (including cursor).

  rb://1836. Approved by Marko.
2013-01-14 10:49:51 +05:30
Satya Bodapati
d95914b648 Merge Post Fix for BUG#14628410 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-01-04 17:34:02 +05:30
Satya Bodapati
bf42e842e5 Merge fix for Bug#14628410 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2012-12-13 18:56:47 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
2f7295575d Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-12-11 10:51:24 +05:30
Yasufumi Kinoshita
ddf518c567 Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:07:02 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
8dd87e690d Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:05:23 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
718de371c1 Bug #14676249 : ROW_VERS_IMPL_X_LOCKED_LOW() MIGHT HIT !BPAGE->FILE_PAGE_WAS_FREED ASSERTION
trx_undo_prev_version_build() should confirm existence of inherited (not-own) external pages.

Bug #14676084 : ROW_UNDO_MOD_UPD_DEL_SEC() DOESN'T NEED UNDO_ROW AND UNDO_EXT INITIALIZED
 mtr script could hit the assertion error !bpage->file_page_was_freed using this path.
 So, also fixed

rb://1337 approved by Marko Makela.
2012-11-26 15:59:35 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
20bbc6f7e7 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-11-15 20:38:04 +02:00
Jimmy Yang
e42cd2db91 Fix Bug #14753402 - FAILING ASSERTION: LEN == IFIELD->FIXED_LEN
rb://1411 approved by Marko
2012-11-14 17:00:41 +08:00
Annamalai Gurusami
2b68f44034 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-11-09 18:56:20 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
f9389d584d Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-10-18 17:14:57 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
52ea152294 Bug#14758405: ALTER TABLE: ADDING SERIAL NULL DATATYPE: ASSERTION:
LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)

This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
auto-increment columns.

row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
row_search_max_autoinc().

rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
2012-10-18 17:03:06 +03:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
ed6732dd16 bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
2012-10-15 09:49:50 +05:30
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
9bfc910f2f bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
2012-10-15 09:24:33 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
61bd7d0ce9 Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5 2012-10-09 16:41:13 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
b59a64e2f3 Bug #13249921 ASSERT !BPAGE->FILE_PAGE_WAS_FREED, USUALLY IN
TRANSACTION ROLLBACK

Description:  During the rollback operation, a blob page 
is removed earlier than desired.  Consider following scenario:

1. create table t1(a int primary key,b blob) engine=innodb;
2. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
3. begin;
4. update t1 set b=concat(b,'b');
5. update t1 set a=a+1;
6. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
7. rollback;

The update operation in line 5 produces 2 undo log record. The first
undo record (TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC) goes to trx->update_undo and the
second undo record (TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC) goes to trx->insert_undo.
During rollback, they are executed out of order.

When the undo record TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC is applied/executed,
the blob ownership is also reset.  Because of this the blob page
is released earlier than desired.  This blob page must have been
freed only as part of applying/executing the undo record
TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC.

This problem can be avoided by executing the undo records in
order.  This patch will make innodb to execute the undo records
in order.

rb://1125 approved by Marko.
2012-09-28 16:02:58 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
356c42d2c2 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-09-28 16:42:31 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
9d41d7c57b Bug #14500557 CRASH WHEN USING LONG INNODB INDEXES
The ha_innobase table handler contained two search key buffers
(srch_key_val1, srch_key_val2) of fixed size used to store the search
key.  The size of these buffers where fixed at
REC_VERSION_56_MAX_INDEX_COL_LEN + 2.  But this size is not sufficient
to hold the search key.  Hence the following assert in
row_sel_convert_mysql_key_to_innobase() failed.

2438                 /* Storing may use at most data_len bytes of buf */
2439 
2440                 if (UNIV_LIKELY(!is_null)) {
2441                         ut_a(buf + data_len <= original_buf + buf_len);
2442                         row_mysql_store_col_in_innobase_format(
2443                                 dfield, buf,
2444                                 FALSE, /* MySQL key value format col */
2445                                 key_ptr + data_offset, data_len,
2446                                 dict_table_is_comp(index->table));
2447                         buf += data_len;
2448                 }

The buffer size is now calculated with the formula
MAX_KEY_LENGTH + MAX_REF_PARTS*2.  This properly takes into account
the extra bytes needed to store the length for each column.  An index
can contain a maximum of MAX_REF_PARTS columns in it, and for each
column 2 bytes are needed to store length.  

rb://1238 approved by Marko and Vasil Dimov.
2012-09-04 14:33:56 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
b252933551 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-08-21 10:59:11 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
05c6614d01 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-08-09 10:06:59 +03:00
Inaam Rana
b91be27733 merge from 5.1 2012-05-24 12:44:27 -04:00
Marko Mäkelä
a6da754a31 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-05-15 15:11:34 +03:00
Sunanda Menon
074ce71e90 Merge from mysql-5.1.63-release 2012-05-08 07:19:14 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
08e7444e54 Bug#11758510 (#50723): INNODB CHECK TABLE FATAL SEMAPHORE WAIT TIMEOUT POSSIBLY TOO SHORT FOR BI
Fixed not to check timeout during the check table.
2012-04-27 19:38:13 +09:00
Georgi Kodinov
7fa28bcf56 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-04-10 14:23:17 +03:00
Inaam Rana
5352a76134 Bug#13704145: ELIMINATE LRU SCAN WHEN DROPPING A TABLE
rb://942
approved by: Marko Makela

We don't need to scan LRU for dropping AHI entries when DROPing a table.
AHI entries are already removed when we free up extents for the btree.
2012-03-26 09:45:01 -04:00
Georgi Kodinov
5bf1a28915 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-21 14:56:29 +02:00
Joerg Bruehe
747fbf8f8b Merge the 5.5.22 release build into main 5.5,
conflict in "sql/filesort.cc" solved manually.
2012-03-20 22:27:49 +01:00
Jimmy Yang
7f4d66d4cf Fix Bug #13860722 - INCOMPLETE PERFORMANCE SCHEMA INSTRUMENTATION IN INNODB 2012-03-20 17:44:51 +08:00
Georgi Kodinov
9c366f7921 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-08 17:19:54 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
7e36c4bdb0 Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1

rb:961
rb:947
2012-03-01 11:05:51 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
2367e79e4c Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-02-28 21:43:08 +02:00