1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-05-11 13:21:44 +03:00

465 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Annamalai Gurusami
4acca3431f Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-06-01 11:49:07 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
a2bc9b3669 Bug #13933132: [ERROR] GOT ERROR -1 WHEN READING TABLE APPEARED
WHEN KILLING

Suppose there is a query waiting for a lock.  If the user kills
this query, then "Got error -1 when reading table" error message
must not be logged in the server log file.  Since this is a user
requested interruption, no spurious error message must be logged
in the server log.  This patch will remove the error message from
the log.

approved by joh and tatjana
2012-05-30 10:05:04 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
326b40c9c8 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-05-10 10:33:16 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
391ea219c2 Bug #14007649 65111: INNODB SOMETIMES FAILS TO UPDATE ROWS INSERTED
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO

The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.  
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not 
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type.  Because of 
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and 
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read. 
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.  
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone().  It calls the 
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation 
required.  I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type 
correctly. 

rb://1060 approved by Marko
2012-05-10 10:18:31 +05:30
Joerg Bruehe
5be07ceadd Merge 5.5.24 back into main 5.5.
This is a weave merge, but without any conflicts.
In 14 source files, the copyright year needed to be updated to 2012.
2012-05-07 22:20:42 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
96b62513f6 Bug#11758510 (#50723): INNODB CHECK TABLE FATAL SEMAPHORE WAIT TIMEOUT POSSIBLY TOO SHORT FOR BI
Fixed not to check timeout during the check table.
2012-04-27 19:40:12 +09:00
Georgi Kodinov
7fa28bcf56 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-04-10 14:23:17 +03:00
Sergey Glukhov
ea1b0492a0 5.1-security -> 5.5-security merge 2012-04-04 14:19:00 +04:00
Sergey Glukhov
b5c690aa54 Bug#11766300 59387: FAILING ASSERTION: CURSOR->POS_STATE == 1997660512 (BTR_PCUR_IS_POSITIONE
Bug#13639204 64111: CRASH ON SELECT SUBQUERY WITH NON UNIQUE INDEX
The crash happened due to wrong calculation
of key length during creation of reference for
sort order index. The problem is that
keyuse->used_tables can have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT enabled
but used_tables parameter(create_ref_for_key() func) does
not have it. So key parts which have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT
are ommited and it could lead to incorrect key length
calculation(zero key length).


mysql-test/r/subselect_innodb.result:
  test result
mysql-test/t/subselect_innodb.test:
  test case
sql/sql_select.cc:
  added OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT to the used_tables parameter
  for create_ref_for_key() function.
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  added assertion, request from Inno team
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  added assertion, request from Inno team
2012-04-04 13:29:45 +04:00
Sunny Bains
d1809a5c85 Bug #13817703 - auto_increment_offset != 1 + innodb_autoinc_lock_mode=1 => bulk inserts fail
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
  
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
2012-03-29 18:02:08 +11:00
Georgi Kodinov
5bf1a28915 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-21 14:56:29 +02:00
Inaam Rana
1ca73ab435 merge from 5.1 2012-03-15 12:45:24 -04:00
Annamalai Gurusami
7e36c4bdb0 Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1

rb:961
rb:947
2012-03-01 11:05:51 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
c1615df32c Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-02-27 17:23:56 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
6ff320e0f6 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-02-16 12:28:49 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
56e3f68c72 Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5
The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
2012-02-06 13:00:41 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
1c4fd3bb54 Fix Bug#11754376 45976: INNODB LOST FILES FOR TEMPORARY TABLES ON
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN

During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.

The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.

The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.

The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".

This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.

Reviewed by:	Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
2012-02-06 12:44:59 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
1fbbacfea5 ha_innobase::records_in_range(): Remove a debug assertion
that prohibits an open range (full table).
This assertion catches unnecessary calls to this method, but such calls
are not harming correctness.
2012-02-02 13:54:27 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
d9aeddf76a Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-01-16 10:30:51 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
020f3914a2 Bug #11765438 58406:
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS

This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924.  I am 
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
2012-01-16 09:58:31 +05:30
Yasufumi Kinoshita
ad6a4986eb Bug#12400341 INNODB CAN LEAVE ORPHAN IBD FILES AROUND
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.

rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-01-10 14:23:20 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
115f5e8551 Bug#12400341 INNODB CAN LEAVE ORPHAN IBD FILES AROUND
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.

rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-01-10 14:18:58 +09:00
Vasil Dimov
cb80ad09da Partial fix for Bug#11764622 57480: MEMORY LEAK WHEN HAVING 256+ TABLES
Port vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20111205083046-jtgi1emlvtfnjatt from mysql-trunk
2011-12-29 16:19:33 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
b7b9a4e810 Partial fix for Bug#11764622 57480: MEMORY LEAK WHEN HAVING 256+ TABLES
Port vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20111205082756-wtlg8isyn4yohyny from mysql-trunk
2011-12-29 16:11:07 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
76383243b2 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2011-12-13 17:10:09 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
ad84fb5c37 Bug #13117023: Innodb increments handler_read_key when it should not
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented 
incorrectly.

The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object.  This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).

This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).

The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup).  It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
2011-12-13 14:26:12 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
de479ab3b6 Followup to vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20111118115710-1xlezv0nbjz6s2ps
Fix merge issues after discussing with Marko.
2011-11-21 15:26:24 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
63e381e98d Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5
I manually checked that all the conflicting InnoDB changes are in 5.5 already.
Two things I am not sure about - I commented them with XXX in this patch.
I will further check with the authors of the changesets whether these things
should be present or not.
2011-11-18 13:57:10 +02:00
unknown
93773656e8 Merge from mysql-5.5.18-release 2011-11-17 09:00:58 +01:00
Karen Langford
e1df69f75a Merge from mysql-5.1.60-release 2011-11-17 00:26:16 +01:00
Marko Mäkelä
1f746cb03c Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2011-11-10 13:08:42 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
a0a51251e4 Bug#11759688 52020: InnoDB can still deadlock on just INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY
a.k.a. Bug#7975 deadlock without any locking, simple select and update

Bug#7975 was reintroduced when the storage engine API was made
pluggable in MySQL 5.1. Instead of looking at thd->lex directly, we
rely on handler::extra(). But, we were looking at the wrong extra()
flag, and we were ignoring the TRX_DUP_REPLACE flag in places where we
should obey it.

innodb_replace.test: Add tests for hopefully all affected statement
types, so that bug should never ever resurface. This kind of tests
should have been added when fixing Bug#7975 in MySQL 5.0.3 in the
first place.

rb:806 approved by Sunny Bains
2011-11-10 12:49:31 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
19b9de6bd5 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2011-11-07 13:51:11 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
b003b6294c Add debug assertions to catch Bug#13345378 earlier.
In all callers of row_sel_convert_mysql_key_to_innobase(), assert
that the converted key is empty or nonempty when it should be.
2011-11-07 13:37:19 +02:00
Jimmy Yang
93da33309f Fix Bug #11835889 - INNODB ASSERTS ON BAD FILE READ, INDEX TRANSLATION
TABLE ERROR, RECOVERY
            
rb://792 approved by Sunny Bains
2011-10-27 00:40:53 -07:00
Marko Mäkelä
7ef002e949 Merge mysql-5.1-security to mysql-5.5-security. 2011-10-25 18:06:05 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
013ba71dfd Bug#13002783 PARTIALLY UNINITIALIZED CASCADE UPDATE VECTOR
In the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause of FOREIGN KEY constraints, the
calculated update vector was not fully initialized. This bug was
introduced in the InnoDB Plugin when implementing support for
ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC.

Additionally, the data type information was not initialized, but
apparently it has never been needed in this case.  Nevertheless, it is
not good programming practice to pass uninitialized values around.

calc_row_difference(): Declare the update field uninitialized in
Valgrind. Copy the data type information as well, except when the
field is SQL NULL. In the built-in InnoDB, initialize
ufield->extern_storage = FALSE (an initialization bug that had gone
unnoticed this far). The InnoDB Plugin and later have this flag to
dfield_t and have always initialized it properly.

row_ins_cascade_calc_update_vec(): Reduce the scope of some
pointers. Initialize orig_len. (This caused the bug in InnoDB Plugin
and later.)

row_ins_foreign_check_on_constraint(): Simplify a condition. Declare
the update vector uninitialized.

rb:771 approved by Jimmy Yang
2011-10-25 17:33:38 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
5dc19b9ce1 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2011-10-12 09:21:33 +03:00
Daniel Fischer
7450044eb7 merge from 5.5.16 2011-09-21 12:40:41 +02:00
Jimmy Yang
d1a80e6ad7 Fix Bug #12885783 - BLOCK LOADING TABLE WITH LARGE COLLATION NUMBER
FROM 5.6 SERVER

rb://747 approved by Marko
2011-09-07 21:42:14 -07:00
Marko Mäkelä
247ada63af Bug#12547647 UPDATE LOGGING COULD EXCEED LOG PAGE SIZE
This fix was accidentally pushed to mysql-5.1 after the 5.1.59 clone-off in
bzr revision id marko.makela@oracle.com-20110829081642-z0w992a0mrc62s6w
with the fix of Bug#12704861 Corruption after a crash during BLOB update
but not merged to mysql-5.5 and upwards.

In the Barracuda formats, the clustered index record no longer
contains a prefix of off-page columns. Because of this, the undo log
must contain these prefixes, so that purge and multi-versioning will
continue to work. However, this also means that an undo log record can
become too big to fit in an undo log page. (It is a limitation of the
undo log that undo records cannot span across multiple pages.)

In case the checks for undo log size fail when CREATE TABLE or CREATE
INDEX is executed, we need a fallback that blocks a modification
operation when the undo log record would exceed the maximum size.

trx_undo_free_last_page_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_free_page_in_rollback().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.

trx_undo_free_last_page(): Wrapper for trx_undo_free_last_page_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.

trx_undo_truncate_end_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_truncate_end().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds. Rewrite a for(;;) loop
as a while loop for clarity.

trx_undo_truncate_end(): Wrapper for from trx_undo_truncate_end_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.

trx_undo_erase_page_end(): Return TRUE if the page was non-empty
to begin with. Refuse to erase empty pages.

trx_undo_report_row_operation(): If the page for which the undo log
was too big was empty, free the undo page and return DB_TOO_BIG_RECORD.

rb:749 approved by Inaam Rana
2011-09-01 21:48:04 +03:00
Jimmy Yang
d9c3d35437 In innobase_format_name() we should call innobase_convert_name() with
"!is_index_name" instead of "is_index_name", so the table name in the
error message would not be formated as index name.
2011-08-17 02:39:55 -07:00
Jimmy Yang
95fa7fab3b Fix bug #11830883, SUPPORT "CORRUPTED" BIT FOR INNODB TABLES AND INDEXES.
Also addressed issues in bug #11745133, where we could mark a table
corrupted instead of crashing the server when found a corrupted buffer/page
if the table created with innodb_file_per_table on.
2011-08-16 18:07:59 -07:00
Mats Kindahl
cf5e5f837a Merging into mysql-5.5.16-release. 2011-08-15 20:12:11 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
c8163a16fa Merge mysql-5.1-security to mysql-5.5-security. 2011-08-10 15:03:33 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
f2f4b19678 Bug#12626794 61240: UNUSED FUNCTIONS ... 2011-08-10 14:56:14 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
5962cadcfa Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2011-08-08 12:16:15 +03:00
Inaam Rana
fce189fadb Merge from 5.1 the fix for Bug 12356373 2011-07-19 10:54:59 -04:00
Dmitry Lenev
861291f1ab Fix for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".

Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The 
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.

The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock 
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a 
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will 
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.

Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:

1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
   sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ... 
   READ.

Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make 
them unviable for stable versions of server.

So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on 
SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK.

mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
  Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
  HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
  Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
  HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/r/innodb_mysql.result:
  Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
  HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_mysql.test:
  Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
  HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
  even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should 
  be always requested for such tables.
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
  even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should 
  be always requested for such tables.
2011-05-26 17:14:47 +04:00
Marko Mäkelä
8c988dc61b Bug#12699505 Memory leak in row_create_index_for_mysql()
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX: Remove. This condition is already
checked and reported by MySQL before passing the index definition to
the storage engine.

row_create_index_for_mysql(): Remove the redundant check for
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX. When enforcing the column prefix index
limit, invoke dict_mem_index_free(index) to plug the memory leak. In
the loop, use index->n_def instead of dict_index_get_n_fields(index),
because the latter would be 0 for indexes that have not been copied to
the data dictionary cache.

innodb-use-sys-malloc.test:

Add test cases for attempting to trigger the error checks in
row_create_index_for_mysql(). Before MySQL 5.5 and WL#5743, the leak
is only reproducible if ha_innobase::max_supported_key_part_length()
returned a higher limit than the one used in
row_create_index_for_mysql().

In MySQL 5.5 and later, the leak is reproducible with
innodb_large_prefix=true.

rb:688 approved by Jimmy Yang
2011-06-28 15:28:21 +03:00