- Make EXPLAIN UPDATE/DELETE work inside SPs
- Return correct error code from mysql_delete()
- EXPLAIN <multi-DELETE> will create a multi_delete object (as it
affects the optimization). select_result will be only used for
producing EXPLAIN output.
- merged test cases for MySQL bug#27480
- fixed that LOCK TABLES was unable to open temporary table
(covered by grant2 test, merged appropriate code from 5.6)
- commented lines that cause server crash in merge test, reported
MDEV-5042 (not relevant to bug#27480)
It is now possible to kill query by query id. KILL syntax was extended to:
KILL [HARD | SOFT] [CONNECTION | QUERY [ID query_id]] [thread_id | USER user_name]
Added QUERY_ID column to INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PROCESSLIST.
Fixed tests affected by this change:
- added PROCESSLIST.QUERY_ID column
- ID is now keyword and is quoted in SHOW CREATE TABLE output
- PFS statement digest is calculated basing on token id
(not token text). Token id has shifted for keywords residing
after ID in keywords array.
- YYPARSE_PARAM and YYLEX_PARAM are removed in Bison 3.0. Deprecated
since Bison 1.875 in favor of %lex-param, %parse-param.
- %parse-param adds an argument to yyerror() as well, updated
MYSQLerror() accordingly.
- %parse-param allows to declare proper type for argument. That's
what 99% of this patch is about.
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"
Analysis:
----------
The problem here is, if one connection changes its
default db and at the same time another connection executes
"SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
memory.
The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
reported here.
Fix:
----------
Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
and while copying it to processlist.
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"
Analysis:
----------
The problem here is, if one connection changes its
default db and at the same time another connection executes
"SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
memory.
The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
reported here.
Fix:
----------
Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
and while copying it to processlist.
STATUS OF ROLLBACKED TRANSACTION" and bug #17054007 - "TRANSACTION
IS NOT FULLY ROLLED BACK IN CASE OF INNODB DEADLOCK".
The problem in the first bug report was that although deadlock involving
metadata locks was reported using the same error code and message as InnoDB
deadlock it didn't rollback transaction like the latter. This caused
confusion to users as in some cases after ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK transaction
could have been restarted immediately and in some cases rollback was
required.
The problem in the second bug report was that although InnoDB deadlock
caused transaction rollback in all storage engines it didn't cause release
of metadata locks. So concurrent DDL on the tables used in transaction was
blocked until implicit or explicit COMMIT or ROLLBACK was issued in the
connection which got InnoDB deadlock.
The former issue has stemmed from the fact that when support for detection
and reporting metadata locks deadlocks was added we erroneously assumed
that InnoDB doesn't rollback transaction on deadlock but only last statement
(while this is what happens on InnoDB lock timeout actually) and so didn't
implement rollback of transactions on MDL deadlocks.
The latter issue was caused by the fact that rollback of transaction due
to deadlock is carried out by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request
flag at the point where deadlock is detected and performing rollback
inside of trans_rollback_stmt() call when this flag is set. And
trans_rollback_stmt() is not aware of MDL locks, so no MDL locks are
released.
This patch solves these two problems in the following way:
- In case when MDL deadlock is detect transaction rollback is requested
by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request flag.
- Code performing rollback of transaction if THD::transaction_rollback_request
is moved out from trans_rollback_stmt(). Now we handle rollback request
on the same level as we call trans_rollback_stmt() and release statement/
transaction MDL locks.
STATUS OF ROLLBACKED TRANSACTION" and bug #17054007 - "TRANSACTION
IS NOT FULLY ROLLED BACK IN CASE OF INNODB DEADLOCK".
The problem in the first bug report was that although deadlock involving
metadata locks was reported using the same error code and message as InnoDB
deadlock it didn't rollback transaction like the latter. This caused
confusion to users as in some cases after ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK transaction
could have been restarted immediately and in some cases rollback was
required.
The problem in the second bug report was that although InnoDB deadlock
caused transaction rollback in all storage engines it didn't cause release
of metadata locks. So concurrent DDL on the tables used in transaction was
blocked until implicit or explicit COMMIT or ROLLBACK was issued in the
connection which got InnoDB deadlock.
The former issue has stemmed from the fact that when support for detection
and reporting metadata locks deadlocks was added we erroneously assumed
that InnoDB doesn't rollback transaction on deadlock but only last statement
(while this is what happens on InnoDB lock timeout actually) and so didn't
implement rollback of transactions on MDL deadlocks.
The latter issue was caused by the fact that rollback of transaction due
to deadlock is carried out by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request
flag at the point where deadlock is detected and performing rollback
inside of trans_rollback_stmt() call when this flag is set. And
trans_rollback_stmt() is not aware of MDL locks, so no MDL locks are
released.
This patch solves these two problems in the following way:
- In case when MDL deadlock is detect transaction rollback is requested
by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request flag.
- Code performing rollback of transaction if THD::transaction_rollback_request
is moved out from trans_rollback_stmt(). Now we handle rollback request
on the same level as we call trans_rollback_stmt() and release statement/
transaction MDL locks.
Following variables do not require LOCK_open protection anymore:
- table_def_cache (renamed to tdc_hash) is protected by rw-lock
LOCK_tdc_hash;
- table_def_shutdown_in_progress doesn't need LOCK_open protection;
- last_table_id use atomics;
- TABLE_SHARE::ref_count (renamed to TABLE_SHARE::tdc.ref_count)
is protected by TABLE_SHARE::tdc.LOCK_table_share;
- TABLE_SHARE::next, ::prev (renamed to tdc.next and tdc.prev),
oldest_unused_share, end_of_unused_share are protected by
LOCK_unused_shares;
- TABLE_SHARE::m_flush_tickets (renamed to tdc.m_flush_tickets)
is protected by TABLE_SHARE::tdc.LOCK_table_share;
- refresh_version (renamed to tdc_version) use atomics.
includes:
* remove some remnants of "Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING"
* introduce LOCK_share, now LOCK_ha_data is strictly for engines
* rea_create_table() always creates .par file (even in "frm-only" mode)
* fix a 5.6 bug, temp file leak on dummy ALTER TABLE
