1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-11-09 11:41:36 +03:00
Commit Graph

2401 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oleksandr Byelkin
65405308a1 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2023-08-01 11:52:13 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
4dd38f9f39 MDEV-31800 Problem with open ranges on prefix blobs keys
don't construct open ranges from prefix blob keys for < (less than)
just as it's already done for > (greater than)

because prefix KEY_PART doesn't create prefix Field for blobs
(see open_table_from_share() near "Create a new field for the key part"),
so stored_field_cmp_to_item() will compare the original field to the
value not taking the prefix length into account.
2023-07-31 22:46:47 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f52954ef42 Merge commit '10.4' into 10.5 2023-07-20 11:54:52 +02:00
Rex
f17a865c39 MDEV-30710 Incorrect operator when comparing large unsigned integers.
When constructing a SEL_TREE, an unsigned integer greater than
its signed equivalent caused an incorrect comparison operator to
be chosen.
2023-07-19 15:59:33 +11:00
Sergei Petrunia
f5dceafd0b MDEV-30964: MAX_SEL_ARG memory exhaustion is not visible in the optimizer trace
Add printing
2023-06-08 14:02:34 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
223c2c5b9d Merge 10.6 into 10.9 2023-06-08 10:46:19 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
80585c9d6f Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-06-08 10:42:56 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
a0e7bd735b MDEV-31380: Assertion `s->table->opt_range_condition_rows <= s->found_records' failed
LooseScan code set opt_range_condition_rows to be the

  MIN(loose_scan_plan->records, table->records)

totally ignoring possible quick range selects.  If there was a quick
select $QUICK on another index with

  $QUICK->records < loose_scan_plan->records

this would create a situation where

   opt_range_condition_rows > $QUICK->records

which causes an assert in 10.6+ and potentially wrong query plan
choice in 10.5.

Fixed by making opt_range_condition_rows to be the minimum #rows
of any quick select.

Approved-by: Monty <monty@mariadb.org>
2023-06-07 13:54:34 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
c15c8ef3e3 Merge 10.6 into 10.8 2023-04-26 13:58:40 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
818d5e4814 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-04-25 13:10:33 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
3c25077899 Merge 10.6 into 10.8 2023-04-24 15:59:23 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
1d74927c58 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2023-04-24 12:43:47 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
abe4c7bfd6 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-04-21 16:38:22 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
be7ef6566f MDEV-30605: Wrong result while using index for group-by
A GROUP BY query which uses "MIN(pk)" and has "pk<>const" in the
WHERE clause would produce wrong result when handled with "Using index
for group-by".  Here "pk" column is the table's primary key.

The problem was introduced by fix for MDEV-23634. It made the range
optimizer to not produce ranges for conditions in form "pk != const".

However, LooseScan code requires that the optimizer is able to
convert the condition on the MIN/MAX column into an equivalent range.
The range is used to locate the row that has the MIN/MAX value.

LooseScan checks this in check_group_min_max_predicates(). This fix
makes the code in that function to take into account that "pk != const"
does not produce a range.
2023-04-18 14:42:47 +03:00
Igor Babaev
ef4d09948d MDEV-20773 Error from UPDATE when estimating selectivity of a range
This bug could affect multi-update statements as well as single-table
update statements processed as multi-updates when the where condition
contained a range condition over a non-indexed varchar column. The
optimizer calculates selectivity of such range conditions using histograms.
For each range the buckets containing endpoints of the the range are
determined with a procedure that stores the values of the endpoints in the
space of the record buffer where values of the columns are usually stored.
For a range over a varchar column the value of a endpoint may exceed the
size of the buffer and in such case the value is stored with truncation.
This truncations cannot affect the result of the calculation of the range
selectivity as the calculation employes only the beginning of the value
string. However it can trigger generation of an unexpected error on this
truncation if an update statement is processed.
This patch prohibits truncation messages when selectivity of a range
condition is calculated for a non-indexed column.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2023-04-12 08:14:56 -07:00
Marko Mäkelä
dbab3e8d90 Merge 10.6 into 10.8 2023-02-10 13:43:53 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
6aec87544c Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-02-10 13:03:01 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
c41c79650a Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2023-02-10 12:02:11 +02:00
Vicențiu Ciorbaru
08c852026d Apply clang-tidy to remove empty constructors / destructors
This patch is the result of running
run-clang-tidy -fix -header-filter=.* -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' .

Code style changes have been done on top. The result of this change
leads to the following improvements:

1. Binary size reduction.
* For a -DBUILD_CONFIG=mysql_release build, the binary size is reduced by
  ~400kb.
* A raw -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release reduces the binary size by ~1.4kb.

2. Compiler can better understand the intent of the code, thus it leads
   to more optimization possibilities. Additionally it enabled detecting
   unused variables that had an empty default constructor but not marked
   so explicitly.

   Particular change required following this patch in sql/opt_range.cc

   result_keys, an unused template class Bitmap now correctly issues
   unused variable warnings.

   Setting Bitmap template class constructor to default allows the compiler
   to identify that there are no side-effects when instantiating the class.
   Previously the compiler could not issue the warning as it assumed Bitmap
   class (being a template) would not be performing a NO-OP for its default
   constructor. This prevented the "unused variable warning".
2023-02-09 16:09:08 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
88c35781cc Merge 10.7 into 10.8 2023-01-13 11:11:04 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
1e04cafcba Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2023-01-13 10:47:56 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
3386b30975 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-01-13 10:45:41 +02:00
Monty
7d1df207c4 MDEV-30373 Wrong result with range access
This issue was caused by the bug fix for
MDEV-30325 Wrong result upon range query using index condition

The bug could happen in the case of several overlapping key ranges
with OR
2023-01-11 18:12:40 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
92c8d6f168 Merge 10.7 into 10.8
The MDEV-25004 test innodb_fts.versioning is omitted because ever since
commit 685d958e38 InnoDB would not allow
writes to a database where the redo log file ib_logfile0 is missing.
2023-01-10 14:42:50 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
ab36eac584 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2023-01-10 13:58:03 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
56c9b0bca0 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-01-10 13:54:17 +02:00
Monty
494acc1938 MDEV-30325 Wrong result upon range query using index condition wrong result upon range query using index condition
This was caused by a bug in key_or() when SEL_ARG* key1 has been cloned
and is overlapping with SEL_ARG *key2

Cloning of SEL_ARG's happens only in very special cases, which is why this
bug has remained undetected for years.

It happend in the following query:

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM lineitem force index
(i_l_orderkey_quantity,i_l_shipdate) WHERE
l_shipdate < '1994-01-01' AND l_orderkey < 800 OR
l_quantity > 3 AND l_orderkey NOT IN ( 157, 1444 );

Because there are two different indexes that can be used and the code for
IN causes a 'tree_or', which causes all SEL_ARG's to be cloned.

Other things:
- While checking the code, I found a bug in SEL_ARG::SEL_ARG(SEL_ARG &arg)
 - This was incrementing next_key_part->use_count as part of creating a
   copy of an existing SEL_ARG.
   This is however not enough as the 'reverse operation' when the copy is
   not needed is 'key2_cpy.increment_use_count(-1)', which does something
   completely different.
   Fixed by calling increment_use_count(1) in SEL_ARG::SEL_ARG.
2023-01-05 11:19:35 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
75d631f333 Merge branch '10.7' into 10.8 2022-08-09 09:52:15 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
1d48041982 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.7 2022-08-08 17:12:32 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
ee620a7416 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2022-08-04 16:58:42 +02:00
Sergei Petrunia
3b071bad19 MDEV-29242: Assertion `computed_weight == weight' failed SEL_ARG::verify_weight
Make SEL_ARG::make_root() maintain SEL_ARG::weight.

Also, an unrelated change: fix dbug_print_sel_arg() to correctly
print SQL NULL for the right endpoint.
2022-08-04 17:10:20 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
d2f1c3ed6c Merge branch '10.5' into bb-10.6-release 2022-08-03 12:19:59 +02:00
Sergei Petrunia
90ba999e80 MDEV-25020: Range optimizer regression for key IN (const, ....)
(addressed review input)
The issue was introduced by @@optimizer_max_sel_arg_weight code.
key_or() calls SEL_ARG::update_weight_locally().  That function
takes O(tree->elements) time.
Without that call, key_or(big_tree, one_element_tree) would take
O(log(big_tree)) when one_element_tree doesn't overlap with elements
of big_tree.
This means, update_weight_locally() can cause a big slowdown.

The fix:
1. key_or() actually doesn't need to call update_weight_locally().
  It calls SEL_ARG::tree_delete() and SEL_ARG::insert(). These functions
  update SEL_ARG::weight.
  It also manipulates the SEL_ARG objects directly, but these
  modifications do not change the weight of the tree.
  I've just removed the update_weight_locally() call.
2. and_all_keys() also calls update_weight_locally(). It manipulates the
  SEL_ARG graph directly.
  Removed that call and added the code to update the SEL_ARG graph weight.

Tests main.range and main.range_not_embedded already contain the queries
that have test coverage for the affected code.
2022-08-01 14:29:02 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
c75e3770dc Merge 10.7 into 10.8 2022-02-09 16:24:19 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
70a8875564 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-02-09 16:04:49 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
cce994057b Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-02-09 15:49:50 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
34c5019698 Merge branch '10.5' into bb-10.5-release 2022-02-09 08:57:41 +01:00
Monty
d314bd2664 MDEV-27442 Wrong result upon query with DISTINCT and EXISTS subquery
The problem was that get_best_group_min_max() did not check if fields used
by the "group_min_max optimization" where used in sub queries.
Because of this, it did not detect that a key (b,a) was used in the WHERE
clause for the statement:
SELECT DISTINCT b FROM t1 WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM DUAL WHERE a > 1 ).

Fixed by also traversing the sub queries when checking if a field is used.
This disables group_min_max_optimization for the above query.

Reviewer: Sergei Petrunia
2022-02-08 14:32:28 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4fb2cb1a30 Merge branch '10.7' into 10.8 2022-02-04 14:50:25 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
9ed8deb656 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.7 2022-02-04 14:11:46 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f5c5f8e41e Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2022-02-03 17:01:31 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
cf63eecef4 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2022-02-01 20:33:04 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
a576a1cea5 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2022-01-30 09:46:52 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
41a163ac5c Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2022-01-29 15:41:05 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
62760af4df MDEV-27426 Wrong result upon query using index_merge with DESC key
Make QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::cmp_next() aware of reverse-ordered key parts.

(QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::cmp_prev() uses key_cmp() and so it already works
correctly)
2022-01-26 18:43:06 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
96bdda6c96 MDEV-26996 Reverse-ordered indexes: improve print-out
When printing a range into optimizer trace, print DESC for columns
that are reverse-ordered, for example:

   "(4) <= (key1 DESC) <= (2)"
2022-01-26 18:43:06 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
d6c6f79f5d MDEV-26996 Reverse-ordered indexes: remove SEL_ARG::is_ascending
Instead, Get the "is_ascending" value from the array of KEY_PART
structures that describes the [pseudo-]index that is being analyzed.
2022-01-26 18:43:06 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
cbfe6a5e86 MDEV-26996 Support descending indexes in the range optimizer
- Code cleanup
- Disable "Using index for GROUP BY" over indexes with DESC keyparts
2022-01-26 18:43:06 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
791146b9d2 MDEV-26996 Support descending indexes in the range optimizer
Make the Range Optimizer support descending index key parts.

We follow the approach taken in MySQL-8.

See HowRangeOptimizerHandlesDescKeyparts for the description.
2022-01-26 18:43:05 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
a4cac0e07a MDEV-26938 Support descending indexes internally in InnoDB (server part)
* preserve DESC index property in the parser
* store it in the frm (only for HA_KEY_ALG_BTREE)
* read it from the frm
* show it in SHOW CREATE
* skip DESC indexes in opt_range.cc and opt_sum.cc
* ORDER BY test

This includes a fix of MDEV-27432.
2022-01-26 18:43:05 +01:00