BUG#54872 MBR: replication failure caused by using tmp table inside transaction
Changed criteria to classify a statement as unsafe in order to reduce the
number of spurious warnings. So a statement is classified as unsafe when
there is on-going transaction at any point of the execution if:
1. The mixed statement is about to update a transactional table and
a non-transactional table.
2. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary transactional
table and a non-transactional table.
3. The mixed statement is about to update a transactional table and
read from a non-transactional table.
4. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary transactional
table and read from a non-transactional table.
5. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a transactional table when the isolation level is
lower than repeatable read.
After updating a transactional table if:
6. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a temporary transactional table.
7. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a temporary transactional table.
8. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactionala table
and read from a temporary non-transactional table.
9. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary non-transactional
table and update a non-transactional table.
10. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary non-transactional
table and read from a non-transactional table.
11. A statement is about to update a non-transactional table and the
option variables.binlog_direct_non_trans_update is OFF.
The reason for this is that locks acquired may not protected a concurrent
transaction of interfering in the current execution and by consequence in
the result. So the patch reduced the number of spurious unsafe warnings.
Besides we fixed a regression caused by BUG#51894, which makes temporary
tables to go into the trx-cache if there is an on-going transaction. In
MIXED mode, the patch for BUG#51894 ignores that the trx-cache may have
updates to temporary non-transactional tables that must be written to the
binary log while rolling back the transaction.
So we fix this problem by writing the content of the trx-cache to the
binary log while rolling back a transaction if a non-transactional
temporary table was updated and the binary logging format is MIXED.
BUG#54872 MBR: replication failure caused by using tmp table inside transaction
Changed criteria to classify a statement as unsafe in order to reduce the
number of spurious warnings. So a statement is classified as unsafe when
there is on-going transaction at any point of the execution if:
1. The mixed statement is about to update a transactional table and
a non-transactional table.
2. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary transactional
table and a non-transactional table.
3. The mixed statement is about to update a transactional table and
read from a non-transactional table.
4. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary transactional
table and read from a non-transactional table.
5. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a transactional table when the isolation level is
lower than repeatable read.
After updating a transactional table if:
6. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a temporary transactional table.
7. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactional table
and read from a temporary transactional table.
8. The mixed statement is about to update a non-transactionala table
and read from a temporary non-transactional table.
9. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary non-transactional
table and update a non-transactional table.
10. The mixed statement is about to update a temporary non-transactional
table and read from a non-transactional table.
11. A statement is about to update a non-transactional table and the
option variables.binlog_direct_non_trans_update is OFF.
The reason for this is that locks acquired may not protected a concurrent
transaction of interfering in the current execution and by consequence in
the result. So the patch reduced the number of spurious unsafe warnings.
Besides we fixed a regression caused by BUG#51894, which makes temporary
tables to go into the trx-cache if there is an on-going transaction. In
MIXED mode, the patch for BUG#51894 ignores that the trx-cache may have
updates to temporary non-transactional tables that must be written to the
binary log while rolling back the transaction.
So we fix this problem by writing the content of the trx-cache to the
binary log while rolling back a transaction if a non-transactional
temporary table was updated and the binary logging format is MIXED.
concurrently execute the statement XA START 'x', then mysqld
server could crash.
sql/sql_class.cc:
xid_cache_insert: added checking for element in cache before
insert it, return TRUE if such element already exists.
sql/sql_parse.cc:
mysql_execute_command modified:
* sequence of calls to xid_cache_search(..)/xid_cache_insert(...)
replaced by call to xid_cache_insert(...) in alternative
'case SQLCOM_XA_START:'
* added comment to alternative 'case SQLCOM_XA_COMMIT:'.
DROP USER
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.
After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
mysql-test/include/diff_tables.inc:
Expend its abilities.
Now it can diff not only in sessions of 'master' and 'slave', but
other sessions as well.
mysql-test/include/rpl_diff_tables.inc:
Diff the same table between master and slaves.
sql/log_event.cc:
session's user will be written into Query_log_event, if is_current_user_used() is TRUE.
On slave SQL thread, Only thd->variables.current_user is written into Query_log_event,
if it exists.
sql/sql_acl.cc:
On slave SQL thread, grantor should copy from thd->variables.current_user, if it exists
sql/sql_class.h:
On slave SQL thread, thd->variables.current_user is used to store the applying event's
invoker.
DROP USER
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.
After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
strict aliasing violations.
One somewhat major source of strict-aliasing violations and
related warnings is the SQL_LIST structure. For example,
consider its member function `link_in_list` which takes
a pointer to pointer of type T (any type) as a pointer to
pointer to unsigned char. Dereferencing this pointer, which
is done to reset the next field, violates strict-aliasing
rules and might cause problems for surrounding code that
uses the next field of the object being added to the list.
The solution is to use templates to parametrize the SQL_LIST
structure in order to deference the pointers with compatible
types. As a side bonus, it becomes possible to remove quite
a few casts related to acessing data members of SQL_LIST.
sql/handler.h:
Use the appropriate template type argument.
sql/item.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary cast.
sql/item_subselect.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/item_sum.cc:
Use the appropriate template type argument.
Remove now-unnecessary cast.
sql/mysql_priv.h:
Move SQL_LIST structure to sql_list.h
Use the appropriate template type argument.
sql/sp.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_delete.cc:
Use the appropriate template type argument.
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_derived.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_lex.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_lex.h:
SQL_LIST now takes a template type argument which must
match the type of the elements of the list. Use forward
declaration when the type is not available, it is used
in pointers anyway.
sql/sql_list.h:
Rename SQL_LIST to SQL_I_List. The template parameter is
the type of object that is stored in the list.
sql/sql_olap.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_parse.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_prepare.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_select.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_show.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_table.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_trigger.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_union.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_update.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_view.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
storage/myisammrg/ha_myisammrg.cc:
Remove now-unnecessary casts.
strict aliasing violations.
One somewhat major source of strict-aliasing violations and
related warnings is the SQL_LIST structure. For example,
consider its member function `link_in_list` which takes
a pointer to pointer of type T (any type) as a pointer to
pointer to unsigned char. Dereferencing this pointer, which
is done to reset the next field, violates strict-aliasing
rules and might cause problems for surrounding code that
uses the next field of the object being added to the list.
The solution is to use templates to parametrize the SQL_LIST
structure in order to deference the pointers with compatible
types. As a side bonus, it becomes possible to remove quite
a few casts related to acessing data members of SQL_LIST.
Bug#46527 COMMIT AND CHAIN RELEASE does not make sense
Bug#53343 completion_type=1, COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN don't
preserve the isolation level
Bug#53346 completion_type has strange effect in a stored
procedure/prepared statement
Added test cases to verify the expected behaviour of :
SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL,
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL,
@@completion_type,
COMMIT AND CHAIN,
ROLLBACK AND CHAIN
..and some combinations of the above
Bug#46527 COMMIT AND CHAIN RELEASE does not make sense
Bug#53343 completion_type=1, COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN don't
preserve the isolation level
Bug#53346 completion_type has strange effect in a stored
procedure/prepared statement
Added test cases to verify the expected behaviour of :
SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL,
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL,
@@completion_type,
COMMIT AND CHAIN,
ROLLBACK AND CHAIN
..and some combinations of the above
Conflicts:
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/archive.result
Contents conflict in mysql-test/r/innodb_bug38231.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/mdl_sync.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/disabled.def
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_binlog_format_errors.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/archive.test
Contents conflict in mysql-test/t/innodb_bug38231.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mdl_sync.test
Text conflict in sql/sp_head.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_show.cc
Text conflict in sql/table.cc
Text conflict in sql/table.h
Conflicts:
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/archive.result
Contents conflict in mysql-test/r/innodb_bug38231.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/mdl_sync.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/disabled.def
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_binlog_format_errors.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/archive.test
Contents conflict in mysql-test/t/innodb_bug38231.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mdl_sync.test
Text conflict in sql/sp_head.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_show.cc
Text conflict in sql/table.cc
Text conflict in sql/table.h
Some of the server implementations don't support dates later
than 2038 due to the internal time type being 32 bit.
Added checks so that the server will refuse dates that cannot
be handled by either throwing an error when setting date at
runtime or by refusing to start or shutting down the server if
the system date cannot be stored in my_time_t.
Some of the server implementations don't support dates later
than 2038 due to the internal time type being 32 bit.
Added checks so that the server will refuse dates that cannot
be handled by either throwing an error when setting date at
runtime or by refusing to start or shutting down the server if
the system date cannot be stored in my_time_t.
