For commands
(1) alter table t1 add partition (partition p2);
(2) alter table t1 add partition (partition px history);
It printed the same error message:
Wrong partitioning type, expected type: `SYSTEM_TIME`
For (1) it is not clear from the syntax that we are trying to add
HASH partition. For (2) it is not clear that the table partitioning is
different than SYSTEM_TIME. Now it prints what type we are trying to
add to what type of partitioning.
Fixed warning unused function rename_field_in_list() for compilation
without partitioning.
The ALTER related code cannot do at the same time both:
- modify partitions
- change column data types
Explicit changing of a column data type together with a partition change is
prohibited by the parter, so this is not allowed and returns a syntax error:
ALTER TABLE t MODIFY ts BIGINT, DROP PARTITION p1;
This fix additionally disables implicit data type upgrade
(e.g. from "MariaDB 5.3 TIME" to "MySQL 5.6 TIME", or the other way
around according to the current mysql56_temporal_format) in case of
an ALTER modifying partitions, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE t DROP PARTITION p1;
In such commands now only the partition change happens, while
the data types stay unchanged.
One can additionally run:
ALTER TABLE t FORCE;
either before or after the ALTER modifying partitions to
upgrade data types according to mysql56_temporal_format.
10.5 part: test cases and comments.
The code is in the merge commit 74fe1c44aa
When f.ex. table is partitioned by HASH(a) and we rename column `a' to
`b' partitioning filter stays unchanged: HASH(a). That's the wrong
behavior.
The patch updates partitioning filter in accordance to the new columns
names. That includes partition/subpartition expression and
partition/subpartition field list.
When f.ex. table is partitioned by HASH(a) and we rename column `a' to
`b' partitioning filter stays unchanged: HASH(a). That's the wrong
behavior.
The patch updates partitioning filter in accordance to the new columns
names. That includes partition/subpartition expression and
partition/subpartition field list.
There are separate flags DBUG_OFF for disabling the DBUG facility
and ENABLED_DEBUG_SYNC for enabling the DEBUG_SYNC facility.
Let us allow debug builds without DEBUG_SYNC.
Note: For CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug, CMakeLists.txt will continue to
define ENABLED_DEBUG_SYNC.
Making changes to wsrep_mysqld.h causes large parts of server code to
be recompiled. The reason is that wsrep_mysqld.h is included by
sql_class.h, even tough very little of wsrep_mysqld.h is needed in
sql_class.h. This commit introduces a new header file, wsrep_on.h,
which is meant to be included from sql_class.h, and contains only
macros and variable declarations used to determine whether wsrep is
enabled.
Also, header wsrep.h should only contain definitions that are also
used outside of sql/. Therefore, move WSREP_TO_ISOLATION* and
WSREP_SYNC_WAIT macros to wsrep_mysqld.h.
Reviewed-by: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
1. Store assignment failures on incompatible data types now raise errors if:
- STRICT_ALL_TABLES or STRICT_TRANS_TABLES sql_mode is used, and
- IGNORE is not used
Otherwise, only a warning is raised and the statement continues.
2. Changing the error/warning test as follows:
-ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'
+ERROR HY000: Cannot cast 'int' as 'inet6' in assignment of `db`.`t`.`col`
so in case of a big table it's easier to see which column has the problem.
The new error text is also applied to SP variables.
Now INSERT, UPDATE, ALTER statements involving incompatible data type pairs, e.g.:
UPDATE TABLE t1 SET col_inet6=col_int;
INSERT INTO t1 (col_inet6) SELECT col_in FROM t2;
ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY col_inet6 INT;
consistently return an error at the statement preparation time:
ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'
and abort the statement before starting interating rows.
This error is the same with what is raised for queries like:
SELECT col_inet6 FROM t1 UNION SELECT col_int FROM t2;
SELECT COALESCE(col_inet6, col_int) FROM t1;
Before this change the error was caught only during the execution time,
when a Field_xxx::store_xxx() was called for the very firts row.
The behavior was not consistent between various statements and could do different things:
- abort the statement
- set a column to the data type default value (e.g. '::' for INET6)
- set a column to NULL
A typical old error was:
ERROR 22007: Incorrect inet6 value: '1' for column `test`.`t1`.`a` at row 1
EXCEPTION:
Note, there is an exception: a multi-row INSERT..VALUES, e.g.:
INSERT INTO t1 (col_a,col_b) VALUES (a1,b1),(a2,b2);
checks assignment compability at the preparation time for the very first row only:
(col_a,col_b) vs (a1,b1)
Other rows are still checked at the execution time and return the old warnings
or errors in case of a failure. This is done because catching all rows at the
preparation time would change behavior significantly. So it still works
according to the STRICT_XXX_TABLES sql_mode flags and the table transaction ability.
This is too late to change this behavior in 10.7.
There is no a firm decision yet if a multi-row INSERT..VALUES
behavior will change in later versions.
Implicit system-versioned table does not contain system fields in SHOW
CREATE. Therefore after mysqldump recovery such table has system
fields in the last place in frm image. The original table meanwhile
does not guarantee these system fields on last place because adding
new fields via ALTER TABLE places them last. Thus the order of fields
may be different between master and slave, so row-based replication
may fail.
To fix this on ALTER TABLE we now place system-invisible fields always
last in frm image. If the table was created via old revision and has
an incorrect order of fields it can be fixed via any copy operation of
ALTER TABLE, f.ex.:
ALTER TABLE t1 FORCE;
To check the order of fields in frm file one can use hexdump:
hexdump -C t1.frm
Note, the replication fails only when all 3 conditions are met:
1. row-based or mixed mode replication;
2. table has new fields added via ALTER TABLE;
3. table was rebuilt on some, but not all nodes via mysqldump image.
Otherwise it will operate properly even with incorrect order of
fields.
