The thd->variables.option_bits & OPTION_BIN_LOG is currently abused:
it's both a system variable and an implementation switch. The current
approach to this option bit breaks the session variable encapsulation.
Besides it is allowed to change @@session.sql_bin_log within a
transaction what may lead to not correctly logging a transaction.
To fix the problems, we created a thd->variables variable to represent
the "sql_log_bin" and prohibited its update inside a transaction or
sub-statement.
FOR UPDATE is causing a lock".
This patch tries to address problems which were exposed
during backporting of original patch to 5.1 tree.
- It ensures that we don't change locking behavior of simple
SELECT statements on InnoDB tables when they are executed
under LOCK TABLES ... READ and with @@innodb_table_locks=0.
Also we no longer pass TL_READ_DEFAULT/TL_WRITE_DEFAULT
lock types, which are supposed to be parser-only, to
handler::start_stmt() method.
- It makes check_/no_concurrent_insert.inc auxiliary scripts
more robust against changes in test cases that use them
and also ensures that they don't unnecessarily change
environment of caller.
Fix for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT without FOR UPDATE is
causing a lock", with after-review fixes.
SELECT statements with subqueries referencing InnoDB tables
were acquiring shared locks on rows in these tables when they
were executed in REPEATABLE-READ mode and with statement or
mixed mode binary logging turned on.
This was a regression which were introduced when fixing
bug 39843.
The problem was that for tables belonging to subqueries
parser set TL_READ_DEFAULT as a lock type. In cases when
statement/mixed binary logging at open_tables() time this
type of lock was converted to TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock at
open_tables() time and caused InnoDB engine to acquire
shared locks on reads from these tables. Although in some
cases such behavior was correct (e.g. for subqueries in
DELETE) in case of SELECT it has caused unnecessary locking.
This patch tries to solve this problem by rethinking our
approach to how we handle locking for SELECT and subqueries.
Now we always set TL_READ_DEFAULT lock type for all cases
when we read data. When at open_tables() time this lock
is interpreted as TL_READ_NO_INSERT or TL_READ depending
on whether this statement as a whole or call to function
which uses particular table should be written to the
binary log or not (if yes then statement should be properly
serialized with concurrent statements and stronger lock
should be acquired).
Test coverage is added for both InnoDB and MyISAM.
This patch introduces an "incompatible" change in locking
scheme for subqueries used in SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and
SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE.
In 4.1 the server would use a snapshot InnoDB read for
subqueries in SELECT FOR UPDATE and SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE
statements, regardless of whether the binary log is on or off.
If the user required a different type of read (i.e. locking read),
he/she could request so explicitly by providing FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE
clause for each individual subquery.
On of the patches for 5.0 broke this behaviour (which was not documented
or tested), and started to use locking reads fora all subqueries in SELECT ...
FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE. This patch restored 4.1 behaviour.
Adding my_global.h first in all files using
NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS.
Correcting a merge problem resulting from a changed definition
of check_some_access compared to the original patches.
This patch:
- Moves all definitions from the mysql_priv.h file into
header files for the component where the variable is
defined
- Creates header files if the component lacks one
- Eliminates all include directives from mysql_priv.h
- Eliminates all circular include cycles
- Rename time.cc to sql_time.cc
- Rename mysql_priv.h to sql_priv.h
Conflicts:
Text conflict in client/mysqlbinlog.cc
Text conflict in mysql-test/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.daily
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog_row_innodb.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_typeconv_innodb.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_get_master_version_and_clock.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_create_table.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_slave_skip.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_typeconv_innodb.test
Text conflict in mysys/charset.c
Text conflict in sql/field.cc
Text conflict in sql/field.h
Text conflict in sql/item.h
Text conflict in sql/item_func.cc
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/mysqld.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_utility.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_utility.h
Text conflict in sql/set_var.cc
Text conflict in sql/share/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/sql_delete.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_plugin.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_select.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_table.cc
Text conflict in storage/example/ha_example.h
Text conflict in storage/federated/ha_federated.cc
Text conflict in storage/myisammrg/ha_myisammrg.cc
Text conflict in storage/myisammrg/myrg_open.c
concurrent I_S query
There were two problem:
1) MYSQL_LOCK_IGNORE_FLUSH also ignored name locks
2) there was a race between abort_and_upgrade_locks and
alter_close_tables
(i.e. remove_table_from_cache and
close_data_files_and_morph_locks)
Which allowed the table to be opened with MYSQL_LOCK_IGNORE_FLUSH flag
resulting in renaming a partition that was already in use,
which could cause the table to be unusable.
Solution was to not allow IGNORE_FLUSH to skip waiting for
a named locked table.
And to not release the LOCK_open mutex between the
calls to remove_table_from_cache and
close_data_files_and_morph_locks by merging the functions
abort_and_upgrade_locks and alter_close_tables.
DDL no longer aborts mysql_lock_tables(), and hence
we no longer need to support need_reopen flag of this
call.
Remove the flag, and all the code in the server
that was responsible for handling the case when
it was set. This allowed to simplify:
open_and_lock_tables_derived(), the delayed thread,
multi-update.
Rename MYSQL_LOCK_IGNORE_FLUSH to MYSQL_OPEN_IGNORE_FLUSH,
since we now only support this flag in open_table().
Rename MYSQL_LOCK_PERF_SCHEMA to MYSQL_LOCK_LOG_TABLE,
to avoid confusion.
Move the wait for the global read lock for cases
when we do updates in SELECT f1() or DO (UPDATE) to
open_table() from mysql_lock_tables(). When waiting
for the read lock, we could raise need_reopen flag,
which is no longer present in mysql_lock_tables().
Since the block responsible for waiting for GRL
was moved, MYSQL_LOCK_IGNORE_GLOBAL_READ_LOCK
was renamed to MYSQL_OPEN_IGNORE_GLOBAL_READ_LOCK.
Conflicts:
Text conflict in client/mysqlbinlog.cc
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/explain.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/subselect.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/subselect3.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/type_datetime.result
Text conflict in sql/share/Makefile.am
+ failing statements
Implicit DROP event for temporary table is not getting
LOG_EVENT_THREAD_SPECIFIC_F flag, because, in the previous
executed statement in the same thread, which might even be a
failed statement, the thread_specific_used flag is set to
FALSE (in mysql_reset_thd_for_next_command) and not set to TRUE
before connection is shutdown. This means that implicit DROP
event will take the FALSE value from thread_specific_used and
will not set LOG_EVENT_THREAD_SPECIFIC_F in the event header. As
a consequence, mysqlbinlog will not print the pseudo_thread_id
from the DROP event, because one of the requirements for the
printout is that this flag is set to TRUE.
We fix this by setting thread_specific_used whenever we are
binlogging a DROP in close_temporary_tables, and resetting it to
its previous value afterward.
The problem was that ALTER TABLE on a merge table which was locked
using LOCK TABLE ... WRITE, by mistake gave
ER_TABLE_NOT_LOCKED_FOR_WRITE.
During opening of the table to be ALTERed, open_table() tried to
get an upgradable metadata lock. In LOCK TABLEs mode, this lock
must already exist (i.e. taken by LOCK TABLE) as new locks of this
type cannot be acquired for fear of deadlock. So in LOCK TABLEs
mode, open_table() tried to find an existing upgradable lock for
the table to be altered.
The problem was that open_table() also tried to find upgradable
metadata locks for children of merge tables even if no such
locks are needed to execute ALTER TABLE on merge tables.
This patch fixes the problem by making sure that open tables code
only searches for upgradable metadata locks for the merge table
and not for the merge children tables.
The patch also fixes a related bug where an upgradable metadata
lock was aquired outside of LOCK TABLEs mode even if the table in
question was temporary. This bug meant that LOCK TABLES or DDL on
temporary tables by mistake could be blocked/aborted by locks held
on base tables with the same table name by other connections.
Test cases added to merge.test and lock_multi.test.
This patch prevents system threads and system table accesses from
using user-specified values for "lock_wait_timeout". Instead all
such accesses are done using the default value (1 year).
This prevents background tasks (such as replication, events,
accessing stored function definitions, logging, reading time-zone
information, etc.) from failing in cases where the global value
of "lock_wait_timeout" is set very low.
The patch also simplifies the open tables API. Rather than adding
another convenience function for opening and locking system tables,
this patch removes most of the existing convenience functions for
open_and_lock_tables_derived(). Before, open_and_lock_tables() was
a convenience function that enforced derived tables handling, while
open_and_lock_tables_derived() was the main function where derived
tables handling was optional. Now, this convencience function is
gone and the main function is renamed to open_and_lock_tables().
No test case added as it would have required the use of --sleep to
check that system threads and system tables have a different timeout
value from the user-specified "lock_wait_timeout" system variable.
an INFORMATION_SCHEMA table
When a prepared statement using a merged view containing an information
schema table was executed, a metadata lock of the view was not taken.
This meant that it was possible for concurrent view DDL to execute,
thereby breaking the binary log. For example, it was possible
for DROP VIEW to appear in the binary log before a query using the view.
This also happened when a statement in a stored routine was executed a
second time.
For such views, the information schema table is merged into the view
during the prepare phase (or first execution of a statement in a routine).
The problem was that we took a short cut and were not executing full-blown
view opening during subsequent executions of the statement. As a result,
a metadata lock on the view was not taken to protect the view definition.
This patch resolves the problem by making sure a metadata lock is taken
for views even after information schema tables are merged into them.
Test cased added to view.test.
This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks.
The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system
variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION
scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year).
The default value is 1 year.
The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set
the default value parameter upon server startup.
"lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks.
These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures
and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK and HANDLER statements.
The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM
and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable.
InnoDB row locks are unaffected.
One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable
is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout
of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the
connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of
delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts.
It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock
acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock.
A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout
value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs,
ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported.
Test case added to lock_multi.test.
A closely related problem, hardly worth a new bug report:
Removed a spurious call to:
thd->set_current_stmt_binlog_format_row_if_mixed()
in sql_base.cc:lock_tables().
and MDL".
Concurrent execution of a multi-DELETE statement and ALTER
TABLE statement which affected one of the tables used in
the multi-DELETE sometimes led to deadlock.
Similar deadlocks might have occured when one performed
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on a view and concurrently executed
ALTER TABLE for the view's underlying table, or when one
concurrently executed TRUNCATE TABLE for InnoDB table and
ALTER TABLE for the same table.
These deadlocks were caused by a discrepancy between types of
metadata and thr_lock.cc locks acquired by those statements.
What happened was that multi-DELETE/TRUNCATE/DML-through-the-
view statement in the first connection acquired SR lock on a
table, then ALTER TABLE would come in in the second connection
and acquire SNW metadata lock and TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
thr_lock.c lock and then would start waiting for the first
connection during lock upgrade. After that the statement in
the first connection would try to acquire TL_WRITE lock on
table and would start waiting for the second connection,
creating a deadlock.
This patch solves this problem by ensuring that we acquire
SW metadata lock in all cases in which we acquiring write
thr_lock.c lock. This guarantees that deadlocks like the
one described above won't occur since all lock conflicts
in such situation are resolved within MDL subsystem.
This patch also adds assert which should guarantee that
such situations won't arise in future.
Cherry-pick a fix Bug#37148 from next-mr, to preserve
file ids of the added files, and ensure that all the necessary
changes have been pulled.
Since initially Bug#37148 was null-merged into 6.0,
the changeset that is now being cherry-picked was likewise
null merged into next-4284.
Now that Bug#37148 has been reapplied to 6.0, try to make
it work with next-4284. This is also necessary to be able
to pull other changes from 5.1-rep into next-4284.
To resolve the merge issues use this changeset applied
to 6.0:
revid:jperkin@sun.com-20091216103628-ylhqf7s6yegui2t9
revno: 3776.1.1
committer: He Zhenxing <zhenxing.he@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-codebase-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2009-12-17 17:02:50 +0800
message:
Fix merge problem with Bug#37148
failed in open_ltable()
The problem was too restrictive asserts that enforced that
open_ltable() was called without any active HANDLERs, LOCK TABLES
or global read locks.
However, this can happen in several cases when opening system
tables. The assert would, for example, be triggered when drop
function was called from a connection with active HANDLERs as
this would cause open_ltable() to be called for mysql.proc.
The assert could also be triggered when using table-based
general log (mysql.general_log).
This patch removes the asserts since they will be triggered in
several legitimate cases and because the asserts are no longer
relevant due to changes in how locks are released.
The patch also fixes set_needs_thr_lock_abort() that before
ignored its parameter and always set the member variable to TRUE.
Test case added to mdl_sync.test.
Thanks to Dmitry Lenev for help with this bug!
There was two problems:
The first was the symptom, caused by bad error handling in
ha_partition. It did not handle print_error etc. when
having no partitions (when used by dummy handler).
The second was the real problem that when dropping tables
it reused the table type (storage engine) from when the lock
was asked for, not the table type that it had when gaining
the exclusive name lock. So that it tried to delete tables
from wrong storage engines.
Solutions for the first problem was to accept some handler
calls to the partitioning handler even if it was not setup
with any partitions, and also if possible fallback
to use the base handler's default functions.
Solution for the second problem was to remove the optimization
to reuse the definition from the cache, instead always check
the frm-file when holding the LOCK_open mutex
(updated with a fix for a debug print crash and better
comments as required by reviewer, and removed optimization
to avoid reading the frm-file).
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
The auto-inc unsafe warning makes sense even though it's just
one auto-inc table could be involved via a trigger or a stored
function.
However its content was not updated by bug@45677 fixes continuing to mention
two tables whereas the fixes refined semantics of replication of auto_increment
in stored routine.
Fixed with updating the error message, renaming the error and an internal unsafe-condition
constants.
A documentation notice
======================
Inserting into an autoincrement column in a stored function or a trigger
is unsafe for replication.
Even with just one autoincrement column, if the routine is invoked more than
once slave is not guaranteed to execute the statement graph same way as
the master.
And since it's impossible to estimate how many times a routine can be invoked at
the query pre-execution phase (see lock_tables), the statement is marked
pessimistically unsafe.
The problem was that a failure to open a view wasn't being
properly handled. When opening a view with unknown definer,
the open procedure would be treated as successful and would
later crash when attempting to lock the view (which wasn't
opened to begin with).
The solution is to skip further processing when opening a
table if it fails with a fatal error.
condition variable per context instead of one mutex and one conditional
variable for the whole subsystem.
This should increase concurrency in this subsystem.
It also opens the way for further changes which are necessary to solve
such bugs as bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock"
and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter
table".
Two other notable changes done by this patch:
- MDL subsystem no longer implicitly acquires global intention exclusive
metadata lock when per-object metadata lock is acquired. Now this has
to be done by explicit calls outside of MDL subsystem.
- Instead of using separate MDL_context for opening system tables/tables
for purposes of I_S we now create MDL savepoint in the main context
before opening tables and rollback to this savepoint after closing
them. This means that it is now possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error
even not inside a transaction. This might happen in unlikely case when
one runs DDL on one of system tables while also running DDL on some
other tables. Cases when this ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error is not justified
will be addressed by advanced deadlock detector for MDL subsystem which
we plan to implement.
