1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-07-24 19:42:23 +03:00
Commit Graph

69 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9e1fb104a3 Merge tag '11.4' into 11.6
MariaDB 11.4.4 release
2024-11-08 07:17:00 +01:00
69d033d165 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-10-29 16:42:46 +01:00
3d0fb15028 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-10-29 15:24:38 +01:00
0540eac05c MDEV-35180: ref_to_range rewrite causes poor query plan
(Variant 2: only allow rewrite for ref(const))

make_join_select() has a "ref_to_range" rewrite: it would rewrite
any ref access to a range access on the same index if the latter uses
more keyparts.
It seems, he initial intent of this was to fix poor query plan choice
in cases like

  t.keypart1=const AND t.keypart2 < 'foo'

Due to deficiency in cost model, ref access could be picked while range
would enumerate fewer rows and be cheaper.
However, the condition also forces a rewrite in cases like:

  t.keypart1=prev_table.col AND t.keypart1<='foo' AND t.keypart2<'bar'

Here, it can be that
* keypart1=prev_table.col is highly selective
* (keypart1, keypart2) <= ('foo', 'bar') is not at all selective.

Still, the rewrite would be made and poor query plan chosen.
Fixed this by only doing the rewrite if ref access was ref(const)
so we can be certain that quick select also used these restrictions
and will scan a subset of rows that ref access would scan.
2024-10-18 13:37:04 +03:00
3a1cf2c85b MDEV-34679 ER_BAD_FIELD uses non-localizable substrings 2024-10-17 21:37:37 +02:00
ba7088d462 Merge '11.4' into 11.6 2024-10-03 15:59:20 +10:00
5cd3fa81ef Merge 10.11 -> 11.2 2024-09-17 12:34:33 +03:00
d002b1f503 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-09-09 11:34:19 +10:00
c630e23a18 MDEV-34894: Poor query plan, because range estimates are not reused for ref(const)
(Variant 4, with @@optimizer_adjust_secondary_key_costs, reuse in two
places, and conditions are replaced with equivalent simpler forms in two more)

In best_access_path(), ReuseRangeEstimateForRef-3,  the check
for whether
 "all used key_part_i used key_part_i=const"
was incorrect: it may produced a "NO" answer for cases when we
had:
 key_part1= const // some key parts are usable
 key_part2= value_not_in_join_prefix  //present but unusable
 key_part3= non_const_value // unusable due to gap in key parts.

This caused the optimizer to fail to apply ReuseRangeEstimateForRef
heuristics. The consequence is poor query plan choice when the index
in question has very skewed data distribution.

The fix is enabled if its @@optimizer_adjust_secondary_key_costs flag
is set.
2024-09-08 16:26:13 +03:00
36eba98817 MDEV-19123 Change default charset from latin1 to utf8mb4
Changing the default server character set from latin1 to utf8mb4.
2024-07-11 10:21:07 +04:00
cd28b2479c Merge branch '11.1' into 11.2 2024-04-09 12:12:33 +02:00
fec2fd6add Merge 10.11 into 11.0 2024-03-28 10:51:36 +02:00
788953463d Merge 10.6 into 10.11
Some fixes related to commit f838b2d799 and
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event() and Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
for system-versioned tables were provided by Nikita Malyavin.
This was required by test versioning.rpl,trx_id,row.
2024-03-28 09:16:57 +02:00
ccb7a1e9a1 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2024-03-27 15:00:56 +02:00
58df20974b MDEV-33460 select '123' 'x'; unexpected result
Queries that select concatenated constant strings now have
colname and value that match.  For example,
  SELECT '123' 'x';
will return a result where the column name and value both
are '123x'.

Review: Daniel Black
2024-03-27 15:51:26 +11:00
c3a00dfa53 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2024-03-12 09:19:57 +02:00
0185ac64f3 MDEV-30975 Wrong result with cross Join given join order
For queries with derived tables populated having some side-effect, we
will fill such a derived table more than once, but without clearing
its rows.  Consequently it will have duplicate rows.
An example query exhibiting the problem is
  SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN c1 FROM t1 JOIN (SELECT @a := 0) x;
Since mysql_derived_fill will, for UNCACHEABLE_DEPENDENT tables, drop
all rows and repopulate, we relax the condition at line 1204: rather
than assume all uncacheable values prevent early return, we now
allow an early return for uncacheable values other than
UNCACHEABLE_DEPENDENT.  In general, we only populate derived tables
once unless they're dependent tables.
2024-02-14 12:48:25 -05:00
d5e15424d8 Merge 10.6 into 10.10
The MDEV-29693 conflict resolution is from Monty, as well as is
a bug fix where ANALYZE TABLE wrongly built histograms for
single-column PRIMARY KEY.
Also includes a fix for safe_malloc error reporting.

Other things:
- Copied main.log_slow from 10.4 to avoid mtr issue

Disabled test:
- spider/bugfix.mdev_27239 because we started to get
  +Error	1429 Unable to connect to foreign data source: localhost
  -Error	1158 Got an error reading communication packets
- main.delayed
  - Bug#54332 Deadlock with two connections doing LOCK TABLE+INSERT DELAYED
    This part is disabled for now as it fails randomly with different
    warnings/errors (no corruption).
2023-10-14 13:36:11 +03:00
a6bf4b5807 MDEV-29693 ANALYZE TABLE still flushes table definition cache when engine-independent statistics is used
This commits enables reloading of engine-independent statistics
without flushing the table from table definition cache.

This is achieved by allowing multiple version of the
TABLE_STATISTICS_CB object and having independent pointers to it in
TABLE and TABLE_SHARE.  The TABLE_STATISTICS_CB object have reference
pointers and are freed when no one is pointing to it anymore.

TABLE's TABLE_STATISTICS_CB pointer is updated to use the
TABLE_SHARE's pointer when read_statistics_for_tables() is called at
the beginning of a query.

Main changes:
- read_statistics_for_table() will allocate an new TABLE_STATISTICS_CB
  object.
- All get_stat_values() functions has a new parameter that tells
  where collected data should be stored. get_stat_values() are not
  using the table_field object anymore to store data.
- All get_stat_values() functions returns 1 if they found any
  data in the statistics tables.

Other things:
- Fixed INSERT DELAYED to not read statistics tables.
- Removed Statistics_state from TABLE_STATISTICS_CB as this is not
  needed anymore as wer are not changing TABLE_SHARE->stats_cb while
  calculating or loading statistics.
- Store values used with store_from_statistical_minmax_field() in
  TABLE_STATISTICS_CB::mem_root. This allowed me to remove the function
  delete_stat_values_for_table_share().
  - Field_blob::store_from_statistical_minmax_field() is implemented
    but is not normally used as we do not yet support EIS statistics
    for blobs. For example Field_blob::update_min() and
    Field_blob::update_max() are not implemented.
    Note that the function can be called if there is an concurrent
    "ALTER TABLE MODIFY field BLOB" running because of a bug in
    ALTER TABLE where it deletes entries from column_stats
    before it has an exclusive lock on the table.
- Use result of field->val_str(&val) as a pointer to the result
  instead of val (safetly fix).
- Allocate memory for collected statistics in THD::mem_root, not in
  in TABLE::mem_root. This could cause the TABLE object to grow if a
  ANALYZE TABLE was run many times on the same table.
  This was done in allocate_statistics_for_table(),
  create_min_max_statistical_fields_for_table() and
  create_min_max_statistical_fields_for_table_share().
- Store in TABLE_STATISTICS_CB::stats_available which statistics was
  found in the statistics tables.
- Removed index_table from class Index_prefix_calc as it was not used.
- Added TABLE_SHARE::LOCK_statistics to ensure we don't load EITS
  in parallel. First thread will load it, others will reuse the
  loaded data.
- Eliminate read_histograms_for_table(). The loading happens within
  read_statistics_for_tables() if histograms are needed.
  One downside is that if we have read statistics without histograms
  before and someone requires histograms, we have to read all statistics
  again (once) from the statistics tables.
  A smaller downside is the need to call alloc_root() for each
  individual histogram. Before we could allocate all the space for
  histograms with a single alloc_root.
- Fixed bug in MyISAM and Aria where they did not properly notice
  that table had changed after analyze table. This was not a problem
  before this patch as then the MyISAM and Aria tables where flushed
  as part of ANALYZE table which did hide this issue.
- Fixed a bug in ANALYZE table where table->records could be seen as 0
  in collect_statistics_for_table(). The effect of this unlikely bug
  was that a full table scan could be done even if
  analyze_sample_percentage was not set to 1.
- Changed multiple mallocs in a row to use multi_alloc_root().
- Added a mutex protection in update_statistics_for_table() to ensure
  that several tables are not updating the statistics at the same time.

Some of the changes in sql_statistics.cc are based on a patch from
Oleg Smirnov <olernov@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Oleg Smirnov <olernov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicentiu Ciorbaru <cvicentiu@gmail.com>
Reviewer: Sergei Petrunia <sergey@mariadb.com>
2023-08-18 13:28:39 +03:00
ec04357bf9 MDEV-5816: Stored programs: validation of stored program statements
Fix of existing mtr tests.
2023-07-20 17:46:45 +07:00
1fe4bcbe05 Merge 10.11 into 11.0 2023-06-28 09:19:19 +03:00
135e976696 Merge 10.9 into 10.10 2023-06-27 17:43:31 +03:00
493083833b Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-06-26 17:11:38 +03:00
f7e9ac0d88 MDEV-31449: Assertion s->table->opt_range_condition_rows <= s->found_records
Fix a typo in make_join_statistics(): when updating statistics for
derived table, set s->table->... not "table->..."
2023-06-15 11:27:31 +03:00
0eca91ab75 MDEV-30080 Wrong result with LEFT JOINs involving constant tables
The reason things fails in 10.5 and above is that test_quick_select()
returns -1 (impossible range) for empty tables if there are any
conditions attached.

This didn't happen in 10.4 as the cost for a range was more than for
a table scan with 0 rows and get_key_scan_params() did not create any
range plans and thus did not mark the range as impossible.

The code that checked the 'impossible range' conditions did not take
into account all cases of LEFT JOIN usage.

Adding an extra check if the table is used with an ON condition in case
of 'impossible range' fixes the issue.
2023-02-10 12:59:36 +02:00
9a4110aa57 MDEV-30256 Wrong result (missing rows) upon join with empty table
The problem was an assignment in test_quick_select() that flagged empty
tables with "Impossible where". This test was however wrong as it
didn't work correctly for left join.

Removed the test, but added checking of empty tables in DELETE and UPDATE
to get similar EXPLAIN as before.

The new tests is a bit more strict (better) than before as it catches all
cases of empty tables in single table DELETE/UPDATE.
2023-02-10 12:58:50 +02:00
3fa99f0c0e Change cost for REF to take into account cost for 1 extra key read_next
The main difference in code path between EQ_REF and REF is that for
REF we have to do an extra read_next on the index to check that there
is no more matching rows.

Before this patch we added a preference of EQ_REF by ensuring that REF
would always estimate to find at least 2 rows.

This patch adds the cost of the extra key read_next to REF access and
removes the code that limited REF to at least 2 rows. For some queries
this can have a big effect as the total estimated rows will be halved
for each REF table with 1 rows.

multi_range cost calculations are also changed to take into account
the difference between EQ_REF and REF.

The effect of the patch to the test suite:
- About 80 test case changed
- Almost all changes where for EXPLAIN where estimated rows for REF
  where changed from 2 to 1.
- A few test cases using explain extended had a change of 'filtered'.
  This is because of the estimated rows are now closer to the
  calculated selectivity.
- A very few test had a change of table order.
  This is because the change of estimated rows from 2 to 1 or the small
  cost change for REF
  (main.subselect_sj_jcl6, main.group_by, main.dervied_cond_pushdown,
  main.distinct, main.join_nested, main.order_by, main.join_cache)
- No key statistics and the estimated rows are now smaller which cased
  estimated filtering to be lower.
  (main.subselect_sj_mat)
- The number of total rows are halved.
  (main.derived_cond_pushdown)
- Plans with 1 row changed to use RANGE instead of REF.
  (main.group_min_max)
- ALL changed to REF
  (main.key_diff)
- Key changed from ref + index_only to PRIMARY key for InnoDB, as
  OPTIMIZER_ROW_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_ROW_NEXT_FIND_COST is smaller than
  OPTIMIZER_KEY_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST.
  (main.join_outer_innodb)
- Cost changes printouts
  (main.opt_trace*)
- Result order change
  (innodb_gis.rtree)
2023-02-10 12:58:50 +02:00
727491b72a Added test cases for preceding test
This includes all test changes from
"Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds"
and forwards.

Some of the things that caused changes in the result files:

- As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to
  easier find out where things where wrong.
- MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because
  of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY.
  - Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was
    changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen.
- 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to
  something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into
  account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they
  where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that
  we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries
  using FIRSTMATCH.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
  This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out.
- Table orders has changed because more accurate costs.
- 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or
   'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost.
- index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't
  have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read.
  This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause
  but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
- Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore
  (It's a table scan, not an index scan).
- For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2,
  which can be seen in EXPLAIN.
- More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this
  optimization is now more correct (lower).
- A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would
  access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a
  clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary.
  (main.stat_tables_innodb)

Notes:

- There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in
  the main.greedy_optimizer test.  However examining the test results
  it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more
  chained together) so I assume this is ok.
- I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected
  changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where
  faster.  (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
2023-02-03 00:00:35 +03:00
b6215b9b20 Update row and key fetch cost models to take into account data copy costs
Before this patch, when calculating the cost of fetching and using a
row/key from the engine, we took into account the cost of finding a
row or key from the engine, but did not consistently take into account
index only accessed, clustered key or covered keys for all access
paths.

The cost of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) was not consistently
considered in best_access_path().  TIME_FOR_COMPARE was used in
calculation in other places, like greedy_search(), but was in some
cases (like scans) done an a different number of rows than was
accessed.

The cost calculation of row and index scans didn't take into account
the number of rows that where accessed, only the number of accepted
rows.

When using a filter, the cost of index_only_reads and cost of
accessing and disregarding 'filtered rows' where not taken into
account, which made filters cost less than there actually where.

To remedy the above, the following key & row fetch related costs
has been added:

- The cost of fetching and using a row is now split into different costs:
  - key + Row fetch cost (as before) but multiplied with the variable
  'optimizer_cache_cost' (default to 0.5). This allows the user to
  tell the optimizer the likehood of finding the key and row in the
  engine cache.
- ROW_COPY_COST, The cost copying a row from the engine to the
  sql layer or creating a row from the join_cache to the record
  buffer. Mostly affects table scan costs.
- ROW_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of fetching a row by rowid.
- KEY_COPY_COST the cost of finding the next key and copying it from
  the engine to the SQL layer. This is used when we calculate the cost
  index only reads. It makes index scans more expensive than before if
  they cover a lot of rows. (main.index_merge_myisam)
- KEY_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of finding the first key in a range.
  This replaces the old define IDX_LOOKUP_COST, but with a higher cost.
- KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST, the cost of finding the next key (and rowid).
  when doing a index scan and comparing the rowid to the filter.
  Before this cost was assumed to be 0.

All of the above constants/variables are now tuned to be somewhat in
proportion of executing complexity to each other.  There is tuning
need for these in the future, but that can wait until the above are
made user variables as that will make tuning much easier.

To make the usage of the above easy, there are new (not virtual)
cost calclation functions in handler:
- ha_read_time(), like read_time(), but take optimizer_cache_cost into
  account.
- ha_read_and_copy_time(), like ha_read_time() but take into account
  ROW_COPY_TIME
- ha_read_and_compare_time(), like ha_read_and_copy_time() but take
  TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account.
- ha_rnd_pos_time(). Read row with row id, taking ROW_COPY_COST
  into account.  This is used with filesort where we don't need
  to execute the WHERE clause again.
- ha_keyread_time(), like keyread_time() but take
  optimizer_cache_cost into account.
- ha_keyread_and_copy_time(), like ha_keyread_time(), but add
  KEY_COPY_COST.
- ha_key_scan_time(), like key_scan_time() but take
  optimizer_cache_cost nto account.
- ha_key_scan_and_compare_time(), like ha_key_scan_time(), but add
  KEY_COPY_COST & TIME_FOR_COMPARE.

I also added some setup costs for doing different types of scans and
creating temporary tables (on disk and in memory). This encourages
the optimizer to not use these for simple 'a few row' lookups if
there are adequate key lookup strategies.
- TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting a table scan.
- INDEX_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting an index scan.
- HEAP_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating in memory
  temporary table.
- DISK_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating an on disk temporary
  table.

When calculating cost of fetching ranges, we had a cost of
IDX_LOOKUP_COST (0.125) for doing a key div for a new range. This is
now replaced with 'io_cost * KEY_LOOKUP_COST (1.0) *
optimizer_cache_cost', which matches the cost we use for 'ref' and
other key lookups. The effect is that the cost is now a bit higher
when we have many ranges for a key.

Allmost all calculation with TIME_FOR_COMPARE is now done in
best_access_path(). 'JOIN::read_time' now includes the full
cost for finding the rows in the table.

In the result files, many of the changes are now again close to what
they where before the "Update cost for hash and cached joins" commit,
as that commit didn't fix the filter cost (too complex to do
everything in one commit).

The above changes showed a lot of a lot of inconsistencies in
optimizer cost calculation. The main objective with the other changes
was to do calculation as similar (and accurate) as possible and to make
different plans more comparable.

Detailed list of changes:

- Calculate index_only_cost consistently and correctly for all scan
  and ref accesses. The row fetch_cost and index_only_cost now
  takes into account clustered keys, covered keys and index
  only accesses.
- cost_for_index_read now returns both full cost and index_only_cost
- Fixed cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost() to match other
  similar costs. This is bases on the assumption that data is more
  often stored on SSD than a hard disk.
- Replaced constant 2.0 with new define TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST.
- Some scan cost estimates did not take into account
  TIME_FOR_COMPARE. Now all scan costs takes this into
  account. (main.show_explain)
- Added session variable optimizer_cache_hit_ratio (default 50%). By
  adjusting this on can reduce or increase the cost of index or direct
  record lookups. The effect of the default is that key lookups is now
  a bit cheaper than before. See usage of 'optimizer_cache_cost' in
  handler.h.
- JOIN_TAB::scan_time() did not take into account index only scans,
  which produced a wrong cost when index scan was used. Changed
  JOIN_TAB:::scan_time() to take into consideration clustered and
  covered keys. The values are now cached and we only have to call
  this function once. Other calls are changed to use the cached
  values.  Function renamed to JOIN_TAB::estimate_scan_time().
- Fixed that most index cost calculations are done the same way and
  more close to 'range' calculations. The cost is now lower than
  before for small data sets and higher for large data sets as we take
  into account how many keys are read (main.opt_trace_selectivity,
  main.limit_rows_examined).
- Ensured that index_scan_cost() ==
  range(scan_of_all_rows_in_table_using_one_range) +
  MULTI_RANGE_READ_INFO_CONST. One effect of this is that if there
  is choice of doing a full index scan and a range-index scan over
  almost the whole table then index scan will be preferred (no
  range-read setup cost).  (innodb.innodb, main.show_explain,
  main.range)
  - Fixed the EQ_REF and REF takes into account clustered and covered
    keys.  This changes some plans to use covered or clustered indexes
    as these are much cheaper.  (main.subselect_mat_cost,
    main.state_tables_innodb, main.limit_rows_examined)
  - Rowid filter setup cost and filter compare cost now takes into
    account fetching and checking the rowid (KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST).
    (main.partition_pruning heap.heap_btree main.log_state)
  - Added KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST to
    Range_rowid_filter_cost_info::lookup_cost to account of the time
    to find and check the next key value against the container
  - Introduced ha_keyread_time(rows) that takes into account finding
    the next row and copying the key value to 'record'
    (KEY_COPY_COST).
  - Introduced ha_key_scan_time() for calculating an index scan over
    all rows.
  - Added IDX_LOOKUP_COST to keyread_time() as a startup cost.
  - Added index_only_fetch_cost() as a convenience function to
    OPT_RANGE.
  - keyread_time() cost is slightly reduced to prefer shorter keys.
    (main.index_merge_myisam)
  - All of the above caused some index_merge combinations to be
    rejected because of cost (main.index_intersect). In some cases
    'ref' where replaced with index_merge because of the low
    cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost().
  - Some index usage moved from PRIMARY to a covering index.
    (main.subselect_innodb)
- Changed cost calculation of filter to take KEY_LOOKUP_COST and
  TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account.  See sql_select.cc::apply_filter().
  filter parameters and costs are now written to optimizer_trace.
- Don't use matchings_records_in_range() to try to estimate the number
  of filtered rows for ranges. The reason is that we want to ensure
  that 'range' is calculated similar to 'ref'. There is also more work
  needed to calculate the selectivity when using ranges and ranges and
  filtering.  This causes filtering column in EXPLAIN EXTENDED to be
  100.00 for some cases where range cannot use filtering.
  (main.rowid_filter)
- Introduced ha_scan_time() that takes into account the CPU cost of
  finding the next row and copying the row from the engine to
  'record'. This causes costs of table scan to slightly increase and
  some test to changed their plan from ALL to RANGE or ALL to ref.
  (innodb.innodb_mysql, main.select_pkeycache)
  In a few cases where scan time of very small tables have lower cost
  than a ref or range, things changed from ref/range to ALL.
  (main.myisam, main.func_group, main.limit_rows_examined,
  main.subselect2)
- Introduced ha_scan_and_compare_time() which is like ha_scan_time()
  but also adds the cost of the where clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE).
- Added small cost for creating temporary table for
  materialization. This causes some very small tables to use scan
  instead of materialization.
- Added checking of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) of the
  accepted rows to ROR costs in get_best_ror_intersect()
- Removed '- 0.001' from 'join->best_read' and optimize_straight_join()
  to ensure that the 'Last_query_cost' status variable contains the
  same value as the one that was calculated by the optimizer.
- Take avg_io_cost() into account in handler::keyread_time() and
  handler::read_time(). This should have no effect as it's 1.0 by
  default, except for heap that overrides these functions.
- Some 'ref_or_null' accesses changed to 'range' because of cost
  adjustments (main.order_by)
- Added scan type "scan_with_join_cache" for optimizer_trace. This is
  just to show in the trace what kind of scan was used.
- When using 'scan_with_join_cache' take into account number of
  preceding tables (as have to restore all fields for all previous
  table combination when checking the where clause)
  The new cost added is:
  (row_combinations * ROW_COPY_COST * number_of_cached_tables).
  This increases the cost of join buffering in proportion of the
  number of tables in the join buffer. One effect is that full scans
  are now done earlier as the cost is then smaller.
  (main.join_outer_innodb, main.greedy_optimizer)
- Removed the usage of 'worst_seeks' in cost_for_index_read as it
  caused wrong plans to be created; It prefered JT_EQ_REF even if it
  would be much more expensive than a full table scan. A related
  issue was that worst_seeks only applied to full lookup, not to
  clustered or index only lookups, which is not consistent. This
  caused some plans to use index scan instead of eq_ref (main.union)
- Changed federated block size from 4096 to 1500, which is the
  typical size of an IO packet.
- Added costs for reading rows to Federated. Needed as there is no
  caching of rows in the federated engine.
- Added ha_innobase::rnd_pos_time() cost function.
- A lot of extra things added to optimizer trace
  - More costs, especially for materialization and index_merge.
  - Make lables more uniform
  - Fixed a lot of minor bugs
  - Added 'trace_started()' around a lot of trace blocks.
- When calculating ORDER BY with LIMIT cost for using an index
  the cost did not take into account the number of row retrivals
  that has to be done or the cost of comparing the rows with the
  WHERE clause. The cost calculated would be just a fraction of
  the real cost. Now we calculate the cost as we do for ranges
  and 'ref'.
- 'Using index for group-by' is used a bit more than before as
  now take into account the WHERE clause cost when comparing
  with 'ref' and prefer the method with fewer row combinations.
  (main.group_min_max).

Bugs fixed:
- Fixed that we don't calculate TIME_FOR_COMPARE twice for some plans,
  like in optimize_straight_join() and greedy_search()
- Fixed bug in save_explain_data where we could test for the wrong
  index when displaying 'Using index'. This caused some old plans to
  show 'Using index'.  (main.subselect_innodb, main.subselect2)
- Fixed bug in get_best_ror_intersect() where 'min_cost' was not
  updated, and the cost we compared with was not the one that was
  used.
- Fixed very wrong cost calculation for priority queues in
  check_if_pq_applicable(). (main.order_by now correctly uses priority
  queue)
- When calculating cost of EQ_REF or REF, we added the cost of
  comparing the WHERE clause with the found rows, not all row
  combinations. This made ref and eq_ref to be regarded way to cheap
  compared to other access methods.
- FORCE INDEX cost calculation didn't take into account clustered or
  covered indexes.
- JT_EQ_REF cost was estimated as avg_io_cost(), which is half the
  cost of a JT_REF key. This may be true for InnoDB primary key, but
  not for other unique keys or other engines. Now we use handler
  function to calculate the cost, which allows us to handle
  consistently clustered, covered keys and not covered keys.
- ha_start_keyread() didn't call extra_opt() if keyread was already
  enabled but still changed the 'keyread' variable (which is wrong).
  Fixed by not doing anything if keyread is already enabled.
- multi_range_read_info_cost() didn't take into account io_cost when
  calculating the cost of ranges.
- fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order() used the wrong
  record_count when calling best_access_path() for SJ_OPT_FIRST_MATCH
  and SJ_OPT_LOOSE_SCAN.
- Hash joins didn't provide correct best_cost to the upper level, which
  means that the cost for hash_joins more expensive than calculated
  in best_access_path (a difference of 10x * TIME_OF_COMPARE).
  This is fixed in the new code thanks to that we now include
  TIME_OF_COMPARE cost in 'read_time'.

Other things:
- Added some 'if (thd->trace_started())' to speed up code
- Removed not used function Cost_estimate::is_zero()
- Simplified testing of HA_POS_ERROR in get_best_ror_intersect().
  (No cost changes)
- Moved ha_start_keyread() from join_read_const_table() to join_read_const()
  to enable keyread for all types of JT_CONST tables.
- Made a few very short functions inline in handler.h

Notes:
- In main.rowid_filter the join order of order and lineitem is swapped.
  This is because the cost of doing a range fetch of lineitem(98 rows) is
  almost as big as the whole join of order,lineitem. The filtering will
  also ensure that we only have to do very small key fetches of the rows
  in lineitem.
- main.index_merge_myisam had a few changes where we are now using
  less keys for index_merge. This is because index scans are now more
  expensive than before.
- handler->optimizer_cache_cost is updated in ha_external_lock().
  This ensures that it is up to date per statements.
  Not an optimal solution (for locked tables), but should be ok for now.
- 'DELETE FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > 0 ORDER BY t1.a' does not take cost of
  filesort into consideration when table scan is chosen.
  (main.myisam_explain_non_select_all)
- perfschema.table_aggregate_global_* has changed because an update
  on a table with 1 row will now use table scan instead of key lookup.

TODO in upcomming commits:
- Fix selectivity calculation for ranges with and without filtering and
  when there is a ref access but scan is chosen.
  For this we have to store the lowest known value for
  'accepted_records' in the OPT_RANGE structure.
- Change that records_read does not include filtered rows.
- test_if_cheaper_ordering() needs to be updated to properly calculate
  costs. This will fix tests like main.order_by_innodb,
  main.single_delete_update
- Extend get_range_limit_read_cost() to take into considering
  cost_for_index_read() if there where no quick keys. This will reduce
  the computed cost for ORDER BY with LIMIT in some cases.
  (main.innodb_ext_key)
- Fix that we take into account selectivity when counting the number
  of rows we have to read when considering using a index table scan to
  resolve ORDER BY.
- Add new calculation for rnd_pos_time() where we take into account the
  benefit of reading multiple rows from the same page.
2023-02-02 21:43:30 +03:00
956980971f Update cost for hash and cached joins
The old code did not't correctly add TIME_FOR_COMPARE to rows that are
part of the scan that will be compared with the attached where clause.

Now the cost calculation for hash join and full join cache join are
identical except for HASH_FANOUT (10%)

The cost for a join with keys is now also uniform.
The total cost for a using a key for lookup is calculated in one place as:

(cost_of_finding_rows_through_key(records) + records/TIME_FOR_COMPARE)*
record_count_of_previous_row_combinations + startup_cost

startup_cost is the cost of a creating a temporary table (if needed)

Best_cost now includes the cost of comparing all WHERE clauses and also
cost of joining with previous row combinations.

Other things:
- Optimizer trace is now printing the total costs, including testing the
  WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) and comparing with all previous rows.
- In optimizer trace, include also total cost of query together with the
  final join order. This makes it easier to find out where the cost was
  calculated.
- Old code used filter even if the cost for it was higher than not using a
  filter. This is not corrected.
- When rebasing on 10.11, I noticed some changes to access_cost_factor
  calculation. These changes was not picked as the coming changes
  to filtering will make that code obsolete.
2023-02-02 20:49:35 +03:00
b67144893a Update matching_candidates_in_table() to treat all conditions similar
Fixed also that the 'with_found_constraint parameter' to
matching_candidates_in_table() is as documented: It is now true only
if there is a reference to a previous table in the WHERE condition for
the current examined table (as it was originally documented)

Changes in test results:
- Filtered was 25% smaller for some queries (expected).
- Some join order changed (probably because the tables had very few rows).
- Some more table scans, probably because there would be fewer returned
  rows.
- Some tests exposes a bug that if there is more filtered rows, then the
  cost for table scan will be higher. This will be fixed in a later commit.
2023-02-02 20:19:32 +03:00
45087dd0b3 Merge branch '10.9' into 10.10 2023-01-18 16:45:59 +01:00
a8c5635cf1 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-01-17 20:02:29 +02:00
0595dd0f56 MDEV-30080 Wrong result with LEFT JOINs involving constant tables
The reason things fails in 10.5 and above is that test_quick_select()
returns -1 (impossible range) for empty tables if there are any
conditions attached.

This didn't happen in 10.4 as the cost for a range was more than for
a table scan with 0 rows and get_key_scan_params() did not create any
range plans and thus did not mark the range as impossible.

The code that checked the 'impossible range' conditions did not take
into account all cases of LEFT JOIN usage.

Adding an extra check if the table is used with an ON condition in case
of 'impossible range' fixes the issue.
2023-01-13 14:23:55 +02:00
515b9ad05a Added EQ_REF chaining to the greedy_optimizer
MDEV-28073 Slow query performance in MariaDB when using many table

The idea is to prefer and chain EQ_REF tables (tables that uses an
unique key to find a row) when searching for the best table combination.
This significantly reduces row combinations that has to be examined.
This is optimization is enabled when setting optimizer_prune_level=2
(which is now default).

Implementation:
- optimizer_prune_level has a new level, 2, which enables EQ_REF
  optimization in addition to the pruning done by level 1.
  Level 2 is now default.
- Added JOIN::eq_ref_tables that contains bits of tables that could use
  potentially use EQ_REF access in the query.  This is calculated
  in sort_and_filter_keyuse()

Under optimizer_prune_level=2:
- When the greedy_optimizer notices that the preceding table was an
  EQ_REF table, it tries to add an EQ_REF table next. If an EQ_REF
  table exists, only this one will be considered at this level.
  We also collect all EQ_REF tables chained by the next levels and these
  are ignored on the starting level as we have already examined these.
  If no EQ_REF table exists, we continue as normal.

This optimization speeds up the greedy_optimizer combination test with
~25%

Other things:
- I ported the changes in MySQL 5.7 to greedy_optimizer.test to MariaDB
  to be able to ensure we can handle all cases that MySQL can do.
- I have run all tests with --mysqld=--optimizer_prune_level=1 to verify that
  there where no test changes.
2022-07-26 22:27:29 +07:00
51c89849d1 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2021-11-29 11:39:34 +02:00
d4cb177603 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-11-29 11:16:20 +02:00
4da2273876 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-11-29 10:59:22 +02:00
289721de9a Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2021-11-29 10:33:06 +02:00
2fdb556e04 MDEV-8334: Rename utf8 to utf8mb3
This patch changes the main name of 3 byte character set from utf8 to
utf8mb3. New old_mode UTF8_IS_UTF8MB3 is added and set TRUE by default,
so that utf8 would mean utf8mb3. If not set, utf8 would mean utf8mb4.
2021-05-19 06:48:36 +02:00
a3099a3b4a MDEV-24312 master_host has 60 character limit, increase to 255 bytes
Also increase user name up to 128.

The work was started by Rucha Deodhar <rucha.deodhar@mariadb.com>,
contains audit plugin fixes by Alexey Botchkov <holyfoot@askmonty.org>.
2021-04-20 16:36:56 +02:00
f691d9865b MDEV-7317: Make an index ignorable to the optimizer
This feature adds the functionality of ignorability for indexes.
Indexes are not ignored be default.

To control index ignorability explicitly for a new index,
use IGNORE or NOT IGNORE as part of the index definition for
CREATE TABLE, CREATE INDEX, or ALTER TABLE.

Primary keys (explicit or implicit) cannot be made ignorable.

The table INFORMATION_SCHEMA.STATISTICS get a new column named IGNORED that
would store whether an index needs to be ignored or not.
2021-03-04 22:50:00 +05:30
7bcaa541aa Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2020-05-05 21:16:22 +03:00
2c3c851d2c Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2020-05-05 20:33:10 +03:00
644d9f38b9 MDEV-21480: Unique key using ref access though eq_ref access can be used
For a unique key if all the keyparts are NOT NULL or the predicates involving
the keyparts is NULL rejecting, then we can use EQ_REF access instead of ref
access with the unique key
2020-05-01 15:17:10 +05:30
eb483c5181 Updated optimizer costs in multi_range_read_info_const() and sql_select.cc
- multi_range_read_info_const now uses the new records_in_range interface
- Added handler::avg_io_cost()
- Don't calculate avg_io_cost() in get_sweep_read_cost if avg_io_cost is
  not 1.0.  In this case we trust the avg_io_cost() from the handler.
- Changed test_quick_select to use TIME_FOR_COMPARE instead of
  TIME_FOR_COMPARE_IDX to align this with the rest of the code.
- Fixed bug when using test_if_cheaper_ordering where we didn't use
  keyread if index was changed
- Fixed a bug where we didn't use index only read when using order-by-index
- Added keyread_time() to HEAP.
  The default keyread_time() was optimized for blocks and not suitable for
  HEAP. The effect was the HEAP prefered table scans over ranges for btree
  indexes.
- Fixed get_sweep_read_cost() for HEAP tables
- Ensure that range and ref have same cost for simple ranges
  Added a small cost (MULTI_RANGE_READ_SETUP_COST) to ranges to ensure
  we favior ref for range for simple queries.
- Fixed that matching_candidates_in_table() uses same number of records
  as the rest of the optimizer
- Added avg_io_cost() to JT_EQ_REF cost. This helps calculate the cost for
  HEAP and temporary tables better. A few tests changed because of this.
- heap::read_time() and heap::keyread_time() adjusted to not add +1.
  This was to ensure that handler::keyread_time() doesn't give
  higher cost for heap tables than for normal tables. One effect of
  this is that heap and derived tables stored in heap will prefer
  key access as this is now regarded as cheap.
- Changed cost for index read in sql_select.cc to match
  multi_range_read_info_const(). All index cost calculation is now
  done trough one function.
- 'ref' will now use quick_cost for keys if it exists. This is done
  so that for '=' ranges, 'ref' is prefered over 'range'.
- scan_time() now takes avg_io_costs() into account
- get_delayed_table_estimates() uses block_size and avg_io_cost()
- Removed default argument to test_if_order_by_key(); simplifies code
2020-03-27 03:58:32 +02:00
ee33c4a694 Post-merge fix 2020-01-26 11:47:16 +01:00
70815ed5b9 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2020-01-25 16:10:48 +01:00
7e8a58020b MDEV-21383: Possible range plan is not used under certain conditions
[Variant 2 of the fix: collect the attached conditions]

Problem:
make_join_select() has a section of code which starts with
 "We plan to scan all rows. Check again if we should use an index."

the code in that section will [unnecessarily] re-run the range
optimizer using this condition:

  condition_attached_to_current_table AND current_table's_ON_expr

Note that the original invocation of range optimizer in
make_join_statistics was done using the whole select's WHERE condition.
Taking the whole select's WHERE condition and using multiple-equalities
allowed the range optimizer to infer more range restrictions.

The fix:
- Do range optimization using a condition that is an AND of this table's
condition and all of the previous tables' conditions.
- Also, fix the range optimizer to prefer SEL_ARGs with type=KEY_RANGE
over SEL_ARGS with type=MAYBE_KEY, regardless of the key part.
Computing
key_and(
  SEL_ARG(type=MAYBE_KEY key_part=1),
  SEL_ARG(type=KEY_RANGE, key_part=2)
)
will now produce the SEL_ARG with type=KEY_RANGE.
2020-01-24 22:07:22 +03:00
d1ef02e959 MDEV-20265 Unknown column in field list
This patch corrects the fix of the patch for mdev-19421 that resolved
the problem of parsing some embedded join expressions such as
  t1 join t2 left join t3 on t2.a=t3.a on t1.a=t2.a.
Yet the patch contained a bug that prevented proper context analysis
of the queries where such expressions were used together with comma
separated table references in from clauses.
2019-08-30 14:09:43 -07:00