Gain MySQL compatibility by allowing table aliases in a single
table statement.
This now supports the syntax of:
DELETE [delete_opts] FROM tbl_name [[AS] tbl_alias] [PARTITION (partition_name [, partition_name] ...)] ....
The delete.test is from MySQL commit 1a72b69778a9791be44525501960b08856833b8d
/ Change-Id: Iac3a2b5ed993f65b7f91acdfd60013c2344db5c0.
Co-Author: Gleb Shchepa <gleb.shchepa@oracle.com> (for delete.test)
Reviewed by Igor Babaev (igor@mariadb.com)
Statements affected by this bug are delete statements that have all
these conditions
1) single table delete syntax
2) and in (sub-query) predicate
3) semi-join optimization enabled
4) an order by clause.
Semijoin optimization on an innocent looking query, such as
DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (select c2 from t2) ORDER BY c1;
turns it from a single table delete to a multi-table delete.
During multi_delete::initialize_tables for the top level join object, a
table is initialized missing a keep_current_rowid flag, needed to
position a handler for removal of the correct row after the filesort
structure has been built.
Fix provided by Monty (monty@mariadb.com)
OK'd in slack:#askmonty 2023-12-01
applicable to 11.1 on
This patch adds for "--ps-protocol" second execution
of queries "SELECT".
Also in this patch it is added ability to disable/enable
(--disable_ps2_protocol/--enable_ps2_protocol) second
execution for "--ps-prototocol" in testcases.
The parser code for single-table DELETE missed the call of the function
LEX::check_main_unit_semantics(). As a result the the field nested level
of SELECT_LEX structures remained set 0 for all non-top level selects.
This could lead to different kind of problems. In particular this did not
allow to determine properly the selects where set functions had to be
aggregated when they were used in inner subqueries.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
This includes all test changes from
"Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds"
and forwards.
Some of the things that caused changes in the result files:
- As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to
easier find out where things where wrong.
- MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because
of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY.
- Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was
changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen.
- 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to
something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into
account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they
where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that
we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries
using FIRSTMATCH.
(main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out.
- Table orders has changed because more accurate costs.
- 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or
'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost.
- index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't
have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read.
This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause
but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer.
(main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
- Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore
(It's a table scan, not an index scan).
- For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2,
which can be seen in EXPLAIN.
- More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this
optimization is now more correct (lower).
- A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would
access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a
clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary.
(main.stat_tables_innodb)
Notes:
- There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in
the main.greedy_optimizer test. However examining the test results
it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more
chained together) so I assume this is ok.
- I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected
changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where
faster. (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
