The function make_unireg_sortorder ignored the fact that any
view field is represented by a 'ref' object.
This could lead to wrong results for the queries containing
both GROUP BY and ORDER BY clauses.
A wrong order of statements in QUICK_GROUP_MIN_MAX_SELECT::reset
caused a crash when a query with DISTINCT was executed by a loose scan
for an InnoDB table that had been emptied.
present.
A view created with CREATE VIEW ... ORDER BY ... cannot be resolved with
the MERGE algorithm, even when no other part of the CREATE VIEW statement
would require the view to be resolved using the TEMPTABLE algorithm.
The check for presence of the ORDER BY clause in the underlying select is
removed from the st_lex::can_be_merged() function.
The ORDER BY list of the underlying select is appended to the ORDER BY list
Objects of the class Item_equal contain an auxiliary member
eval_item of the type cmp_item that is used only for direct
evaluation of multiple equalities. Currently a multiple equality
is evaluated directly only in the cases when the equality holds
at most for one row in the result set.
The compare collation of eval_item was determined incorectly.
It could lead to returning incorrect results for some queries.
"update existingtable set anycolumn=nonexisting order by nonexisting" would crash
the server.
Though we would find the reference to a field, that doesn't mean we can then use
it to set some values. It could be a reference to another field. If it is NULL,
don't try to use it to set values in the Item_field and instead return an error.
Over the previous patch, this signals an error at the location of the error, rather
than letting the subsequent deref signal it.
The problem is (most probably) caused by whole server shutting down before a
slave thread terminates correctly. Fixing this requires fixing server shutdown
code which has been done in 5.1 tree. Thus we ignore the issue in 5.0 assuming
that it is fixed in 5.1.
"INSERT... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE skips auto_increment values".
When in an INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, using
an autoincrement column, we inserted some autogenerated values and
also updated some rows, some autogenerated values were not used
(for example, even if 10 was the largest autoinc value in the table
at the start of the statement, 12 could be the first autogenerated
value inserted by the statement, instead of 11). One autogenerated
value was lost per updated row. Led to exhausting the range of the
autoincrement column faster.
Bug introduced by fix of BUG#20188; present since 5.0.24 and 5.1.12.
This bug breaks replication from a pre-5.0.24 master.
But the present bugfix, as it makes INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE
behave like pre-5.0.24, breaks replication from a [5.0.24,5.0.34]
master to a fixed (5.0.36) slave! To warn users against this when
they upgrade their slave, as agreed with the support team, we add
code for a fixed slave to detect that it is connected to a buggy
master in a situation (INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE into autoinc column)
likely to break replication, in which case it cannot replicate so
stops and prints a message to the slave's error log and to SHOW SLAVE
STATUS.
For 5.0.36->[5.0.24,5.0.34] replication we cannot warn as master
does not know the slave's version (but we always recommended to users
to have slave at least as new as master).
As agreed with support, I'll also ask for an alert to be put into
the MySQL Network Monitoring and Advisory Service.
The 0000 year is valid.
The ISO standard for "Representation of dates and times" says:
"Calendar years are numbered in ascending order according to the
Gregorian calendar by values in the range [0000] to [9999]."
Reverted fix for 21789: DATETIME with 0000-00-00 11:22:33 should be invalid, but is accepted
as it's not a bug.
Fix for 19370: DateTime datatype in MySQL has two bugs in it
will be reverted during 4.1 -> 5.0 merging as it was pushed to the
5.0 tree.
View check option clauses were ignored for updates of multi-table
views when the updates could not be performed on fly and the rows
to update had to be put into temporary tables first.
with a column of the DATETIME type could return a wrong
result set if the WHERE clause included a BETWEEN condition
on the column.
Fixed the method Item_func_between::fix_length_and_dec
where the aggregation type for BETWEEN predicates calculated
incorrectly if the first argument was a view column of the
DATETIME type.
Before this change, a local variables in stored procedures / stored functions
or triggers, when declared with a type of bit(N), would not evaluate their
value properly.
The problem was that the data was incorrectly typed as a string,
causing for example bit b'1', implemented as a byte 0x01, to be interpreted
as a string starting with the character 0x01. This later would cause
implicit conversions to integers or booleans to fail.
The root cause of this problem was an incorrect translation between field
types, like bit(N), and internal types used when representing values in Item
objects.
Also, before this change, the function HEX() would sometime print extra "0"
characters when invoked with bit(N) values.
With this fix, the type translation (sp_map_result_type, sp_map_item_type)
has been changed so that bit(N) fields are represented with integer values.
A consequence is that, for the function HEX(), when called with a stored
procedure local variable of type bit(N) as argument, HEX() is provided with an
integer instead of a string, and therefore does not print "0" padding.
A test case for Bug 12976 was present in the test suite, and has been updated.
updated.
INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE reports that a record was updated when
the duplicate key occurs even if the record wasn't actually changed
because the update values are the same as those in the record.
Now the compare_record() function is used to check whether the record was
changed and the update of a record reported only if the record differs
from the original one.
