Search conditions were evaluated using val_int(), which was wrong.
Fixing the code to use val_bool() instead.
Details:
- Adding a new item_base_t::IS_COND flag which marks Items used
as <search condition> in WHERE, HAVING, JOIN ON, CASE WHEN clauses.
The flag is at the parse time.
These expressions must be evaluated using val_bool() rather than val_int().
Note, the optimizer creates more Items which are used as search conditions.
Most of these items are not marked with IS_COND yet. This is OK for now,
but eventually these Items can also be fixed to have the flag.
- Adding a method Item::is_cond() which tests if the Item has the IS_COND flag.
- Implementing Item_cache_bool. It evaluates the cached expression using
val_bool() rather than val_int().
Overriding Type_handler_bool::Item_get_cache() to create Item_cache_bool.
- Implementing Item::save_bool_in_field(). It uses val_bool() rather than
val_int() to evaluate the expression.
- Implementing Type_handler_bool::Item_save_in_field()
using Item::save_bool_in_field().
- Fixing all Item_bool_func descendants to implement a virtual val_bool()
rather than a virtual val_int().
- To find places where val_int() should be fixed to val_bool(), a few
DBUG_ASSERT(!is_cond()) where added into val_int() implementations
of selected (most frequent) classes:
Item_field
Item_str_func
Item_datefunc
Item_timefunc
Item_datetimefunc
Item_cache_bool
Item_bool_func
Item_func_hybrid_field_type
Item_basic_constant descendants
- Fixing all places where DBUG_ASSERT() happened during an "mtr" run
to use val_bool() instead of val_int().
Problem was that wsrep_schema tables were not marked as
category information. Fix allows access to wsrep_schema
tables even when node is detached.
This is 10.4-10.9 version of fix.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
Discovered this while working on MDEV-34720: test_if_cheaper_ordering()
uses rec_per_key, while the original estimate for the access method
is produced in best_access_path() by using actual_rec_per_key().
Make test_if_cheaper_ordering() also use actual_rec_per_key().
Also make several getter function "const" to make this compile.
Also adjusted the testcase to handle this (the change backported from
11.0)
Commit a8a75ba2d causes the MariaDB server to crash, usually with signal
11, at random code locations due to invalid pointer values during any
table operation. This issue occurs when the server is built with -O3 and
other customized compiler flags.
For example, the command `use db1;` causes server to crash in the
`check_table_access` function at line sql_parse.cc:7080 because
`tables->correspondent_table` is an invalid pointer value of 0x1.
The crashes are due to undefined behavior from using uninitialized
variables. The problematic commit a8a75ba2d introduces code that
allocates memory and sets it to 0 using thd->calloc before initializing
it with a placement new operation.
This process depends on setting memory to 0 to initialize member
variables not explicitly set in the constructor. However, the compiler
can optimize out the memset/bfill, leading to uninitialized values and
unpredictable issues.
Once a constructor function initializes an object, any uninitialized
variables within that object are subject to undefined behavior. The
state of memory before the constructor runs, whether it involves
memset or was used for other purposes, is irrelevant after the
placement new operation.
This behavior can be demonstrated with this
[test](https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/5n87z1raG) I wrote to examine the
assembly code. The code in MariaDB can be abstracted to the following,
though it has many layers wrapped around it and more complex logic,
causing slight differences in optimization in the MariaDB build.
To summarize, on x86, the memset in the following code is optimized out
with both -O2 and -O3 in GCC 13, and is only preserved in the much older
GCC 4.9.
struct S {
int i; // uninitialized in consturctor
S() {};
};
int bar() {
void *buf = malloc(sizeof(S));
memset(buf, 0, sizeof(S)); // optimized out
S* s = new(buf) S;
return s->i;
}
With GCC13 -O3:
bar():
sub rsp, 8
mov edi, 4
call malloc
mov eax, DWORD PTR [rax]
add rsp, 8
ret
With GCC4.9 -O3
bar():
sub rsp, 8
mov edi, 4
call malloc
mov DWORD PTR [rax], 0
xor eax, eax
add rsp, 8
ret
Now we ensure the constructor initializes variables correctly by running
the reset() function in the constructor to perform the memset/bfill(0)
operation. After applying the fix, the crash is gone.
All new code of the whole pull request, including one or several files
that are either new files or modified ones, are contributed under the
BSD-new license. I am contributing on behalf of my employer Amazon Web
Services.
Improve performance of queries like
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE field = NAME_CONST('a', 4);
by, in this example, replacing the WHERE clause with field = 4
in the case of ref access.
The rewrite is done during fix_fields and we disambiguate this
case from other cases of NAME_CONST by inspecting where we are
in parsing. We rely on THD::where to accomplish this. To
improve performance there, we change the type of THD::where to
be an enumeration, so we can avoid string comparisons during
Item_name_const::fix_fields. Consequently, this patch also
changes all usages of THD::where to conform likewise.
The patch for MDEV-31340 fixed the following bugs:
MDEV-33084 LASTVAL(t1) and LASTVAL(T1) do not work well with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33085 Tables T1 and t1 do not work well with ENGINE=CSV and lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33086 SHOW OPEN TABLES IN DB1 -- is case insensitive with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33088 Cannot create triggers in the database `MYSQL`
MDEV-33103 LOCK TABLE t1 AS t2 -- alias is not case sensitive with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33108 TABLE_STATISTICS and INDEX_STATISTICS are case insensitive with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33109 DROP DATABASE MYSQL -- does not drop SP with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33110 HANDLER commands are case insensitive with lower-case-table-names=0
MDEV-33119 User is case insensitive in INFORMATION_SCHEMA.VIEWS
MDEV-33120 System log table names are case insensitive with lower-cast-table-names=0
Backporting the fixes from 11.5 to 10.5
on disable_indexes(HA_KEY_SWITCH_NONUNIQ_SAVE) the engine does
not know that the long unique is logically unique, because on the
engine level it is not. And the engine disables it,
Change the disable_indexes/enable_indexes API. Instead of the enum
mode, send a key_map of indexes that should be enabled. This way the
server will decide what is unique, not the engine.
Ideally our methods and functions should do one thing, do that well,
and do only that. add_table_to_list does far more than adding a
table to a list, so this commit factors the TABLE_LIST creation out
to a new TABLE_LIST constructor. It then uses placement new()
to create it in the correct memory area (result of thd->calloc).
Benefits of this approach:
1. add_table_to_list now returns as early as possible on an error
2. fewer side-effects incurred on creating the TABLE_LIST object
3. TABLE_LIST won't be calloc'd if copy_to_db fails
4. local declarations moved closer to their respective first uses
5. improved code readability and logical flow
Also factored a couple of other functions to keep the happy path
more to the left, which makes them easier to follow at a glance.
According to the standard, the autoincrement column (i.e. *identity
column*) should be advanced each insert implicitly made by
UPDATE/DELETE ... FOR PORTION.
This is very unconvenient use in several notable cases. Concider a
WITHOUT OVERLAPS key with an autoinc column:
id int auto_increment, unique(id, p without overlaps)
An update or delete with FOR PORTION creates a sense that id will remain
unchanged in such case.
The standard's IDENTITY reminds MariaDB's AUTO_INCREMENT, however
the generation rules differ in many ways. For example, there's also a
notion autoincrement index, which is bound to the autoincrement field.
We will define our own generation rule for the PORTION OF operations
involving AUTO_INCREMENT:
* If an autoincrement index contains WITHOUT OVERLAPS specification, then
a new value should not be generated, otherwise it should.
Apart from WITHOUT OVERLAPS there is also another notable case, referred
by the reporter - a unique key that has an autoincrement column and a field
from the period specification:
id int auto_increment, unique(id, s), period for p(s, e)
for this case, no exception is made, and the autoincrementing rules will be
proceeded accordung to the standard (i.e. the value will be advanced on
implicit inserts).
