MDEV-18957 UPDATE with LIMIT clause is wrong for versioned partitioned tables
UPDATE, DELETE: replace linear search of current/historical records
with vers_setup_conds().
Additional DML cases in view.test
Fix partitioning and DS-MRR to work together
- In ha_partition::index_end(): take into account that ha_innobase (and
other engines using DS-MRR) will have inited=RND when initialized for
DS-MRR scan.
- In ha_partition::multi_range_read_next(): if the MRR scan is using
HA_MRR_NO_ASSOCIATION mode, it is not guaranteed that the partition's
handler will store anything into *range_info.
- In DsMrr_impl::choose_mrr_impl(): ha_partition will inquire partitions
about how much memory their MRR implementation needs by passing
*buffer_size=0. DS-MRR code didn't know about this (actually it used
uint for buffer size calculation and would have an under-flow).
Returning *buffer_size=0 made ha_partition assume that partitions do
not need MRR memory and pass the same buffer to each of them.
Now, this is fixed. If DS-MRR gets *buffer_size=0, it will return
the amount of buffer space needed, but not more than about
@@mrr_buffer_size.
* Fix ha_{innobase,maria,myisam}::clone. If ha_partition uses MRR on its
partitions, and partition use DS-MRR, the code will call handler->clone
with TABLE (*NOT partition*) name as an argument.
DS-MRR has no way of knowing the partition name, so the solution was
to have the ::clone() function for the affected storage engine to ignore
the name argument and get it elsewhere.
Partition table with the AUTO_INCREMENT column we ahve to check if the
max value is properly loaded. So we need to open all tables in INSERT
PARTITION statement if necessary. Also we need to check if some
tables are pruned away and not count the max autoincrement in this case.
- Note that some issues was also fixed in 10.2 and 10.4. I also fixed them
here to be able to continue with making 10.5 valgrind safe again
- Disable connection threads warnings when doing shutdown
The MDEV-20265 commit e746f451d5
introduces DBUG_ASSERT(right_op == r_tbl) in
st_select_lex::add_cross_joined_table(), and that assertion would
fail in several tests that exercise joins. That commit was skipped
in this merge, and a separate fix of MDEV-20265 will be necessary in 10.4.
Exclude SELECT and INSERT SELECT from vers_set_hist_part(). We cannot
likewise exclude REPLACE SELECT because it may REPLACE into itself
(and REPLACE generates history).
INSERT also does not generate history, but we have history
modification setting which might be interfered.
MDEV-19486 and one more similar bug appeared because handler::write_row() interface
welcomes to modify buffer by storage engine. But callers are not ready for that
thus bugs are possible in future.
handler::write_row():
handler::ha_write_row(): make argument const
followup for be5c432a42
ha_partition::calculate_checksum() has to invoke calculate_checksum()
for partitions unconditionally, not under (HA_HAS_OLD_CHECKSUM | HA_HAS_NEW_CHECKSUM).
Because the server uses ::info() to ask for a live checksum, while
calculate_checksum() must, precisely, calculate it the slow way,
also for tables that don't have the live checksum at all.
Also, fix the compilation on Windows (ha_checksum/ulonglong type mix).
Removed not needed table renames when doing ALTER TABLE when engine
changes and both of the following is true:
- Either new or old engine does not store the table in files
- Neither old or new engine uses files from another engine
We also skip renames when ALTER TABLE does an explicit rename
This improves performance, especially for engines where rename is
a slow operation (like the upcoming S3 engine)
Reason for the change was that ha_notify_table_changed() was done
after table open when .frm had been replaced, which caused failure
in engines that checks on open if .frm matches the engines table
definition.
Other changes:
- Remove not needed open/close call at end of inline alter table.
Some test that depended on the table beeing in the table cache after
ALTER TABLE had to be updated.
make live checksum to be returned in handler::info(),
and slow table-scan checksum to be calculated in handler::checksum().
part of
MDEV-16249 CHECKSUM TABLE for a spider table is not parallel and saves all data in memory in the spider head by default
For partitioned table, ensure that the AUTO_INCREMENT values will
be assigned from the same sequence. This is based on the following
change in MySQL 5.6.44:
commit aaba359c13d9200747a609730dafafc3b63cd4d6
Author: Rahul Malik <rahul.m.malik@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Feb 4 13:31:41 2019 +0530
Bug#28573894 ALTER PARTITIONED TABLE ADD AUTO_INCREMENT DIFF RESULT DEPENDING ON ALGORITHM
Problem:
When a partition table is in-place altered to add an auto-increment column,
then its values are starting over for each partition.
Analysis:
In the case of in-place alter, InnoDB is creating a new sequence object
for each partition. It is default initialized. So auto-increment columns
start over for each partition.
Fix:
Assign old sequence of the partition to the sequence of next partition
so it won't start over.
RB#21148
Reviewed by Bin Su <bin.x.su@oracle.com>
Moved rea_create_table() to the sole caller.
Also ha_create_partitioning_metadata(CHF_CREATE_FLAG) does cleanup on
error now.
Part of MDEV-17805 - Remove InnoDB cache for temporary tables.
The MDEV-17262 commit 26432e49d3
was skipped. In Galera 4, the implementation would seem to require
changes to the streaming replication.
In the tests archive.rnd_pos main.profiling, disable_ps_protocol
for SHOW STATUS and SHOW PROFILE commands until MDEV-18974
has been fixed.
If we have a 2+ node cluster which is replicating from an async master
and the binlog_format is set to STATEMENT and multi-row inserts are executed
on a table with an auto_increment column such that values are automatically
generated by MySQL, then the server node generates wrong auto_increment
values, which are different from what was generated on the async master.
In the title of the MDEV-9519 it was proposed to ban start slave on a Galera
if master binlog_format = statement and wsrep_auto_increment_control = 1,
but the problem can be solved without such a restriction.
The causes and fixes:
1. We need to improve processing of changing the auto-increment values
after changing the cluster size.
2. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched on during operation of
the node, then we should immediately update the auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset global variables, without waiting of the next
invocation of the wsrep_view_handler_cb() callback. In the current version
these variables retain its initial values if wsrep_auto_increment_control
is switched on during operation of the node, which leads to inconsistent
results on the different nodes in some scenarios.
3. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched off during operation of the node,
then we must return the original values of the auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset global variables, as the user has set. To make this
possible, we need to add a "shadow copies" of these variables (which stores
the latest values set by the user).
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9519
If we have a 2+ node cluster which is replicating from an async master
and the binlog_format is set to STATEMENT and multi-row inserts are executed
on a table with an auto_increment column such that values are automatically
generated by MySQL, then the server node generates wrong auto_increment
values, which are different from what was generated on the async master.
In the title of the MDEV-9519 it was proposed to ban start slave on a Galera
if master binlog_format = statement and wsrep_auto_increment_control = 1,
but the problem can be solved without such a restriction.
The causes and fixes:
1. We need to improve processing of changing the auto-increment values
after changing the cluster size.
2. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched on during operation of
the node, then we should immediately update the auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset global variables, without waiting of the next
invocation of the wsrep_view_handler_cb() callback. In the current version
these variables retain its initial values if wsrep_auto_increment_control
is switched on during operation of the node, which leads to inconsistent
results on the different nodes in some scenarios.
3. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched off during operation of the node,
then we must return the original values of the auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset global variables, as the user has set. To make this
possible, we need to add a "shadow copies" of these variables (which stores
the latest values set by the user).
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9519
If we have a 2+ node cluster which is replicating from an async master
and the binlog_format is set to STATEMENT and multi-row inserts are executed
on a table with an auto_increment column such that values are automatically
generated by MySQL, then the server node generates wrong auto_increment
values, which are different from what was generated on the async master.
In the title of the MDEV-9519 it was proposed to ban start slave on a Galera
if master binlog_format = statement and wsrep_auto_increment_control = 1,
but the problem can be solved without such a restriction.
The causes and fixes:
1. We need to improve processing of changing the auto-increment values
after changing the cluster size.
2. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched on during operation of
the node, then we should immediately update the auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset global variables, without waiting of the next
invocation of the wsrep_view_handler_cb() callback. In the current version
these variables retain its initial values if wsrep_auto_increment_control
is switched on during operation of the node, which leads to inconsistent
results on the different nodes in some scenarios.
3. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched off during operation of the node,
then we must return the original values of the auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset global variables, as the user has set. To make this
possible, we need to add a "shadow copies" of these variables (which stores
the latest values set by the user).
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9519
Due to inconsistent usage of different cost models to calculate
the cost of ref accesses we have to make the calculation of the
gain promising by usage a range filter more complex.
The code was rewritten in the same way as the code of
ha_partition::multi_range_read_info_const() had been rewritten
earlier.
The fix allowed to run spider.partition_mrr.
