In essence this means that we expect the user query to have at least
one matching row in the end.
This change will not affect the estimated rows for the plan, but will
ensure that the cost for adding a table is not neglected because of
record count being too low.
The reasons for this is that if we have table combination that
together has a very high selectivity then join record_count could
become very low (close to 0)
This would cause costs for all future tables to be so small that they
are irrelevant for the rest of the plan.
This has been shown to be the case in some performance benchmarks and
in a few mtr tests.
There is also still a problem in selectivity calculations as joining two
tables in different order causes a different estimation of total rows.
This can be seen in selectivity_innodb.test, test 'Q20' where joining
nation,supplier is expecting 1.111 rows_out while joining supplier,nation
is expecting 0.04 rows_out.
The reason for 0.04 is that the optimizer estimates 'supplier' to have
10 matching rows, and joining with nation (eq_ref) has 1 row. However
selectivity of n_name = 'UNITED STATES' makes the optimizer things
that there will be only 0.04 matching rows.
This patch avoids this "too low row count" to affect cost
caclulations.
- Simplified test by setting read_time=DBL_MAX at start of loop if
FORCE INDEX is used
- No need to test for 'group by' as the cost compare should handle it.
- Only one test change where index scan was replaced with table scan
(correct)
The old code had a bug when the normal sorting code where
where eliminated as part of "Using index for group-by" optimization.
The effect was that the result contained more rows than expected
- table_after_join_selectivity() should use records_init (new bug)
- get_examined_rows() changed to double to get similar results
as in MariaDB 10.11
- Fixed bug where table_after_join_selectivity() did not correct
selectivity in the case where a RANGE is used instead of a REF.
This can happen if the range can use more key_parts than the REF.
WHERE key_part1=10 and key_part2 < 10
Other things:
- Use JT_RANGE instead of JT_ALL for RANGE access in all parts of the code.
Before we used JT_ALL for RANGE.
- Force RANGE be used in best_access_path() if the range used more key
parts than ref. In the original code, this was done much later in
make_join_select)(). However we need to know in
table_after_join_selectivity() if we have used RANGE or not.
- Added more information about filtering to optimizer_trace.
The reason is that 2 is usually way to low and as information_schema
tables may have implicit locks when accessing rows, it is better that
the optimizer doesn't think that these tables are 'very small and fast'.
This change will affect a very small set of test cases.
Allows FirstMatch to handle the case where the fanout of firstmatch tables
is already less than 1.
Also Fixes LooseScan strategy to set position->{records_init, records_out}
(They were set to 0 which also caused assertion failures)
Author: Sergei Petrunia <sergey@mariadb.com>
Reviewer: Monty
This happens when the subquery marks some index fields as constant
but the fields are still present in GROUP BY
Fixed by checking if the 'constant field' is still part of GROUP BY before
skipping it.
Other things:
- Added Item_field::contains() to make it easier to check if a field
is equal to a Item_field or part of Item_equal.
This solves the current problem in the optimizer
- SELECT FROM big_table
- SELECT from small_table where small_table.eq_ref_key=big_table.id
The old code assumed that each eq_ref access will cause an IO.
As the cost of IO is high, this dominated the cost for the later table
which caused the optimizer to prefer table scans + join cache over
index reads.
This patch fixes this issue by limit the number of expected IO calls,
for rows and index separately, to the size of the table or index or
the number of accesses that we except in a range for the index.
The major changes are:
- Adding a new structure ALL_READ_COST that is mainly used in
best_access_path() to hold the costs parts of the cost we are
calculating. This allows us to limit the number of IO when multiplying
the cost with the previous row combinations.
- All storage engine cost functions are changed to return IO_AND_CPU_COST.
The virtual cost functions should now return in IO_AND_CPU_COST.io
the number of disk blocks that will be accessed instead of the cost
of the access.
- We are not limiting the io_blocks for table or index scans as we
assume that engines may not store these in the 'hot' part of the
cache. Table and index scan also uses much less IO blocks than
key accesses, so the original issue is not as critical with scans.
Other things:
OPT_RANGE now holds a 'Cost_estimate cost' instead a lot of different
costs. All the old costs, like index_only_read, can be extracted
from 'cost'.
- Added to the start of some functions 'handler *file= table->file'
to shorten the code that is using the handler.
- handler->cost() is used to change a ALL_READ_COST or IO_AND_CPU_COST
to 'cost in milliseconds'
- New functions: handler::index_blocks() and handler::row_blocks()
which are used to limit the IO.
- Added index_cost and row_cost to Cost_estimate and removed all not
needed members.
- Removed cost coefficients from Cost_estimate as these don't make sense
when costs (except IO_BLOCKS) are in milliseconds.
- Removed handler::avg_io_cost() and replaced it with DISK_READ_COST.
- Renamed best_range_rowid_filter_for_partial_join() to
best_range_rowid_filter() as using the old name made rows too long.
- Changed all SJ_MATERIALIZATION_INFO 'Cost_estimate' variables to
'double' as Cost_estimate power was not used for these and thus
just caused storage and performance overhead.
- Changed cost_for_index_read() to use 'worst_seeks' to only limit
IO, not number of table accesses. With this patch worst_seeks is
probably not needed anymore, but I kept it around just in case.
- Applying cost for filter got to be much shorter and easier thanks
to the API changes.
- Adjusted cost for fulltext keys in collaboration with Sergei Golubchik.
- Most test changes caused by this patch is that table scans are changed
to use indexes.
- Added ha_seq::keyread_time() and ha_seq::key_scan_time() to get
make checking number of potential IO blocks easier during debugging.
This makes it easier to compare different costs and also allows
the optimizer to optimizer different storage engines more reliably.
- Added tests/check_costs.pl, a tool to verify optimizer cost calculations.
- Most engine costs has been found with this program. All steps to
calculate the new costs are documented in Docs/optimizer_costs.txt
- User optimizer_cost variables are given in microseconds (as individual
costs can be very small). Internally they are stored in ms.
- Changed DISK_READ_COST (was DISK_SEEK_BASE_COST) from a hard disk cost
(9 ms) to common SSD cost (400MB/sec).
- Removed cost calculations for hard disks (rotation etc).
- Changed the following handler functions to return IO_AND_CPU_COST.
This makes it easy to apply different cost modifiers in ha_..time()
functions for io and cpu costs.
- scan_time()
- rnd_pos_time() & rnd_pos_call_time()
- keyread_time()
- Enhanched keyread_time() to calculate the full cost of reading of a set
of keys with a given number of ranges and optional number of blocks that
need to be accessed.
- Removed read_time() as keyread_time() + rnd_pos_time() can do the same
thing and more.
- Tuned cost for: heap, myisam, Aria, InnoDB, archive and MyRocks.
Used heap table costs for json_table. The rest are using default engine
costs.
- Added the following new optimizer variables:
- optimizer_disk_read_ratio
- optimizer_disk_read_cost
- optimizer_key_lookup_cost
- optimizer_row_lookup_cost
- optimizer_row_next_find_cost
- optimizer_scan_cost
- Moved all engine specific cost to OPTIMIZER_COSTS structure.
- Changed costs to use 'records_out' instead of 'records_read' when
recalculating costs.
- Split optimizer_costs.h to optimizer_costs.h and optimizer_defaults.h.
This allows one to change costs without having to compile a lot of
files.
- Updated costs for filter lookup.
- Use a better cost estimate in best_extension_by_limited_search()
for the sorting cost.
- Fixed previous issues with 'filtered' explain column as we are now
using 'records_out' (min rows seen for table) to calculate filtering.
This greatly simplifies the filtering code in
JOIN_TAB::save_explain_data().
This change caused a lot of queries to be optimized differently than
before, which exposed different issues in the optimizer that needs to
be fixed. These fixes are in the following commits. To not have to
change the same test case over and over again, the changes in the test
cases are done in a single commit after all the critical change sets
are done.
InnoDB changes:
- Updated InnoDB to not divide big range cost with 2.
- Added cost for InnoDB (innobase_update_optimizer_costs()).
- Don't mark clustered primary key with HA_KEYREAD_ONLY. This will
prevent that the optimizer is trying to use index-only scans on
the clustered key.
- Disabled ha_innobase::scan_time() and ha_innobase::read_time() and
ha_innobase::rnd_pos_time() as the default engine cost functions now
works good for InnoDB.
Other things:
- Added --show-query-costs (\Q) option to mysql.cc to show the query
cost after each query (good when working with query costs).
- Extended my_getopt with GET_ADJUSTED_VALUE which allows one to adjust
the value that user is given. This is used to change cost from
microseconds (user input) to milliseconds (what the server is
internally using).
- Added include/my_tracker.h ; Useful include file to quickly test
costs of a function.
- Use handler::set_table() in all places instead of 'table= arg'.
- Added SHOW_OPTIMIZER_COSTS to sys variables. These are input and
shown in microseconds for the user but stored as milliseconds.
This is to make the numbers easier to read for the user (less
pre-zeros). Implemented in 'Sys_var_optimizer_cost' class.
- In test_quick_select() do not use index scans if 'no_keyread' is set
for the table. This is what we do in other places of the server.
- Added THD parameter to Unique::get_use_cost() and
check_index_intersect_extension() and similar functions to be able
to provide costs to called functions.
- Changed 'records' to 'rows' in optimizer_trace.
- Write more information to optimizer_trace.
- Added INDEX_BLOCK_FILL_FACTOR_MUL (4) and INDEX_BLOCK_FILL_FACTOR_DIV (3)
to calculate usage space of keys in b-trees. (Before we used numeric
constants).
- Removed code that assumed that b-trees has similar costs as binary
trees. Replaced with engine calls that returns the cost.
- Added Bitmap::find_first_bit()
- Added timings to join_cache for ANALYZE table (patch by Sergei Petrunia).
- Added records_init and records_after_filter to POSITION to remember
more of what best_access_patch() calculates.
- table_after_join_selectivity() changed to recalculate 'records_out'
based on the new fields from best_access_patch()
Bug fixes:
- Some queries did not update last_query_cost (was 0). Fixed by moving
setting thd->...last_query_cost in JOIN::optimize().
- Write '0' as number of rows for const tables with a matching row.
Some internals:
- Engine cost are stored in OPTIMIZER_COSTS structure. When a
handlerton is created, we also created a new cost variable for the
handlerton. We also create a new variable if the user changes a
optimizer cost for a not yet loaded handlerton either with command
line arguments or with SET
@@global.engine.optimizer_cost_variable=xx.
- There are 3 global OPTIMIZER_COSTS variables:
default_optimizer_costs The default costs + changes from the
command line without an engine specifier.
heap_optimizer_costs Heap table costs, used for temporary tables
tmp_table_optimizer_costs The cost for the default on disk internal
temporary table (MyISAM or Aria)
- The engine cost for a table is stored in table_share. To speed up
accesses the handler has a pointer to this. The cost is copied
to the table on first access. If one wants to change the cost one
must first update the global engine cost and then do a FLUSH TABLES.
This was done to be able to access the costs for an open table
without any locks.
- When a handlerton is created, the cost are updated the following way:
See sql/keycaches.cc for details:
- Use 'default_optimizer_costs' as a base
- Call hton->update_optimizer_costs() to override with the engines
default costs.
- Override the costs that the user has specified for the engine.
- One handler open, copy the engine cost from handlerton to TABLE_SHARE.
- Call handler::update_optimizer_costs() to allow the engine to update
cost for this particular table.
- There are two costs stored in THD. These are copied to the handler
when the table is used in a query:
- optimizer_where_cost
- optimizer_scan_setup_cost
- Simply code in best_access_path() by storing all cost result in a
structure. (Idea/Suggestion by Igor)
Added code to support that force index can be used to force an index scan
instead of a full table scan. Currently this code is disable but I added
a test to verify that things works if the code is ever enabled.
Other things:
- FORCE INDEX will now work with "Range checked for each record" and
join cache (see main/type_time_6065)
- Removed code ifdef with BAD_OPTIMIZATION (New cost calculations should
fix this).
- Removed TABLE_LIST->force_index and comment that it should be removed
- Added TABLE->force_index_join and use in the corresponding places.
This means that FORCE INDEX FOR ORDER BY will not affect keys used
in joins anymore.
Remove TODO that the above should be added.
I still kept TABLE->force_index as it's used in
test_if_cheaper_ordering() and opt_range.cc
- Removed setting table->force_index when calling test_quick_select() as
it's not needed (force_index is an argument to test_quick_select())
The original code was mostly rule based and preferred clustered or
covering indexed independent of cost.
There where a few test changes:
- Some test changed from using filesort to index or table scan. This
happened when most of the rows had to be sorted and the ORDER BY could
use covering or a clustered index (innodb_mysql, create_spatial_index).
- Some test changed range to filesort. This where mainly because the range
was scanning most of the rows or using index scan + row lookup and
filesort with table scan is cheaper. (order_by).
- Change in join_cache was because sorting 2 rows is faster than retrieving
10 rows.
- In selectivity_innodb.test one test changed to use a cheaper index.
Creating a record from the join cache is faster than getting a row from
the engine (less and simpler code to execute).
Added JOIN_CACHE_ROW_COPY_COST_FACTOR (0.5 for now) as the factor to
take this into account. This is multiplied with ROW_COPY_COST.
Other things:
- Added cost of copying rows to hash join, similar to join_cache joins.
This cleans up the interface for choose_plan() as it is not depending
on setting join->emb_sj_nest.
choose_plan() now sets up join->emb_sj_nest and join->allowed_tables before
calling optimize_straight_join() and best_extension_by_limited_search().
Other things:
- Converted some 'if' to DBUG_ASSERT() as these should always be true.
- Calculate 'allowed_tables' in choose_plan() as this never changes in
the childs.
- Added assert to check that next_emb->nested_join->n_tables doesn't
get to a wrong value.
- Documented some variables in sql_select.h
The idea is that instead of marking all select_lex's with DISTINCT, we
only mark those that really need distinct result.
Benefits of this change:
- Temporary tables used with derived tables, UNION, IN are now smaller
as duplicates are removed already on the insert phase.
- The optimizer can now produce better plans with EQ_REF. This can be
seen from the tests where several queries does not anymore materialize
derived tables twice.
- Queries affected by 'in_predicate_conversion_threshold' where large IN
lists are converted to sub query produces better plans.
Other things:
- Removed on duplicate call to sel->init_select() in
LEX::add_primary_to_query_expression_body()
- I moved the testing of
tab->table->pos_in_table_list->is_materialized_derived()
in join_read_const_table() to the caller as it caused problems for
derived tables that could be proven to be const tables.
This also is likely to fix some bugs as if join_read_const_table()
was aborted, the table was left marked as JT_CONST, which cannot
be good. I added an ASSERT there for now that can be removed when
the code has been properly tested.
An assert/crash could happen if newtable.alias would be reallocated,
(for example if newtable.alias.safe_c_ptr() was called) when doing
*table= newtable.
Fixed by ensuring that we keep the original state of the alias in 'table'.
records_out is the numbers of rows expected to be accepted from a table.
records_read is in contrast the number of rows that the optimizer excepts
to read from the engine.
This patch causes not plan changes. The differences in test results comes
from renaming "records" to "records_read" and printing of record_out in
the optimizer trace.
Other things:
- Renamed table_cond_selectivity() to table_after_join_selectivity()
to make the purpose of the function more clear.
Variables added:
- optimizer_index_block_copy_cost
- optimizer_key_copy_cost
- optimizer_key_next_find_cost
- optimizer_key_compare_cost
- optimizer_row_copy_cost
- optimizer_where_compare_cost
Some rename of defines was done to make the internal defines similar to
the visible ones:
TIME_FOR_COMPARE -> WHERE_COST; WHERE_COST was also "inverted" to be
a number between 0 and 1 that is multiply with accepted records
(similar to other optimizer variables).
TIME_FOR_COMPARE_IDX -> KEY_COMPARE_COST. This is also inverted,
similar to TIME_FOR_COMPARE.
TIME_FOR_COMPARE_ROWID -> ROWID_COMPARE_COST. This is also inverted,
similar to TIME_FOR_COMPARE.
All default costs are identical to what they where before this patch.
Other things:
- Compare factor in get_merge_buffers_cost() was inverted.
- Changed namespace to static in filesort_utils.cc
Before this patch, when calculating the cost of fetching and using a
row/key from the engine, we took into account the cost of finding a
row or key from the engine, but did not consistently take into account
index only accessed, clustered key or covered keys for all access
paths.
The cost of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) was not consistently
considered in best_access_path(). TIME_FOR_COMPARE was used in
calculation in other places, like greedy_search(), but was in some
cases (like scans) done an a different number of rows than was
accessed.
The cost calculation of row and index scans didn't take into account
the number of rows that where accessed, only the number of accepted
rows.
When using a filter, the cost of index_only_reads and cost of
accessing and disregarding 'filtered rows' where not taken into
account, which made filters cost less than there actually where.
To remedy the above, the following key & row fetch related costs
has been added:
- The cost of fetching and using a row is now split into different costs:
- key + Row fetch cost (as before) but multiplied with the variable
'optimizer_cache_cost' (default to 0.5). This allows the user to
tell the optimizer the likehood of finding the key and row in the
engine cache.
- ROW_COPY_COST, The cost copying a row from the engine to the
sql layer or creating a row from the join_cache to the record
buffer. Mostly affects table scan costs.
- ROW_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of fetching a row by rowid.
- KEY_COPY_COST the cost of finding the next key and copying it from
the engine to the SQL layer. This is used when we calculate the cost
index only reads. It makes index scans more expensive than before if
they cover a lot of rows. (main.index_merge_myisam)
- KEY_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of finding the first key in a range.
This replaces the old define IDX_LOOKUP_COST, but with a higher cost.
- KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST, the cost of finding the next key (and rowid).
when doing a index scan and comparing the rowid to the filter.
Before this cost was assumed to be 0.
All of the above constants/variables are now tuned to be somewhat in
proportion of executing complexity to each other. There is tuning
need for these in the future, but that can wait until the above are
made user variables as that will make tuning much easier.
To make the usage of the above easy, there are new (not virtual)
cost calclation functions in handler:
- ha_read_time(), like read_time(), but take optimizer_cache_cost into
account.
- ha_read_and_copy_time(), like ha_read_time() but take into account
ROW_COPY_TIME
- ha_read_and_compare_time(), like ha_read_and_copy_time() but take
TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account.
- ha_rnd_pos_time(). Read row with row id, taking ROW_COPY_COST
into account. This is used with filesort where we don't need
to execute the WHERE clause again.
- ha_keyread_time(), like keyread_time() but take
optimizer_cache_cost into account.
- ha_keyread_and_copy_time(), like ha_keyread_time(), but add
KEY_COPY_COST.
- ha_key_scan_time(), like key_scan_time() but take
optimizer_cache_cost nto account.
- ha_key_scan_and_compare_time(), like ha_key_scan_time(), but add
KEY_COPY_COST & TIME_FOR_COMPARE.
I also added some setup costs for doing different types of scans and
creating temporary tables (on disk and in memory). This encourages
the optimizer to not use these for simple 'a few row' lookups if
there are adequate key lookup strategies.
- TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting a table scan.
- INDEX_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting an index scan.
- HEAP_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating in memory
temporary table.
- DISK_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating an on disk temporary
table.
When calculating cost of fetching ranges, we had a cost of
IDX_LOOKUP_COST (0.125) for doing a key div for a new range. This is
now replaced with 'io_cost * KEY_LOOKUP_COST (1.0) *
optimizer_cache_cost', which matches the cost we use for 'ref' and
other key lookups. The effect is that the cost is now a bit higher
when we have many ranges for a key.
Allmost all calculation with TIME_FOR_COMPARE is now done in
best_access_path(). 'JOIN::read_time' now includes the full
cost for finding the rows in the table.
In the result files, many of the changes are now again close to what
they where before the "Update cost for hash and cached joins" commit,
as that commit didn't fix the filter cost (too complex to do
everything in one commit).
The above changes showed a lot of a lot of inconsistencies in
optimizer cost calculation. The main objective with the other changes
was to do calculation as similar (and accurate) as possible and to make
different plans more comparable.
Detailed list of changes:
- Calculate index_only_cost consistently and correctly for all scan
and ref accesses. The row fetch_cost and index_only_cost now
takes into account clustered keys, covered keys and index
only accesses.
- cost_for_index_read now returns both full cost and index_only_cost
- Fixed cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost() to match other
similar costs. This is bases on the assumption that data is more
often stored on SSD than a hard disk.
- Replaced constant 2.0 with new define TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST.
- Some scan cost estimates did not take into account
TIME_FOR_COMPARE. Now all scan costs takes this into
account. (main.show_explain)
- Added session variable optimizer_cache_hit_ratio (default 50%). By
adjusting this on can reduce or increase the cost of index or direct
record lookups. The effect of the default is that key lookups is now
a bit cheaper than before. See usage of 'optimizer_cache_cost' in
handler.h.
- JOIN_TAB::scan_time() did not take into account index only scans,
which produced a wrong cost when index scan was used. Changed
JOIN_TAB:::scan_time() to take into consideration clustered and
covered keys. The values are now cached and we only have to call
this function once. Other calls are changed to use the cached
values. Function renamed to JOIN_TAB::estimate_scan_time().
- Fixed that most index cost calculations are done the same way and
more close to 'range' calculations. The cost is now lower than
before for small data sets and higher for large data sets as we take
into account how many keys are read (main.opt_trace_selectivity,
main.limit_rows_examined).
- Ensured that index_scan_cost() ==
range(scan_of_all_rows_in_table_using_one_range) +
MULTI_RANGE_READ_INFO_CONST. One effect of this is that if there
is choice of doing a full index scan and a range-index scan over
almost the whole table then index scan will be preferred (no
range-read setup cost). (innodb.innodb, main.show_explain,
main.range)
- Fixed the EQ_REF and REF takes into account clustered and covered
keys. This changes some plans to use covered or clustered indexes
as these are much cheaper. (main.subselect_mat_cost,
main.state_tables_innodb, main.limit_rows_examined)
- Rowid filter setup cost and filter compare cost now takes into
account fetching and checking the rowid (KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST).
(main.partition_pruning heap.heap_btree main.log_state)
- Added KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST to
Range_rowid_filter_cost_info::lookup_cost to account of the time
to find and check the next key value against the container
- Introduced ha_keyread_time(rows) that takes into account finding
the next row and copying the key value to 'record'
(KEY_COPY_COST).
- Introduced ha_key_scan_time() for calculating an index scan over
all rows.
- Added IDX_LOOKUP_COST to keyread_time() as a startup cost.
- Added index_only_fetch_cost() as a convenience function to
OPT_RANGE.
- keyread_time() cost is slightly reduced to prefer shorter keys.
(main.index_merge_myisam)
- All of the above caused some index_merge combinations to be
rejected because of cost (main.index_intersect). In some cases
'ref' where replaced with index_merge because of the low
cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost().
- Some index usage moved from PRIMARY to a covering index.
(main.subselect_innodb)
- Changed cost calculation of filter to take KEY_LOOKUP_COST and
TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account. See sql_select.cc::apply_filter().
filter parameters and costs are now written to optimizer_trace.
- Don't use matchings_records_in_range() to try to estimate the number
of filtered rows for ranges. The reason is that we want to ensure
that 'range' is calculated similar to 'ref'. There is also more work
needed to calculate the selectivity when using ranges and ranges and
filtering. This causes filtering column in EXPLAIN EXTENDED to be
100.00 for some cases where range cannot use filtering.
(main.rowid_filter)
- Introduced ha_scan_time() that takes into account the CPU cost of
finding the next row and copying the row from the engine to
'record'. This causes costs of table scan to slightly increase and
some test to changed their plan from ALL to RANGE or ALL to ref.
(innodb.innodb_mysql, main.select_pkeycache)
In a few cases where scan time of very small tables have lower cost
than a ref or range, things changed from ref/range to ALL.
(main.myisam, main.func_group, main.limit_rows_examined,
main.subselect2)
- Introduced ha_scan_and_compare_time() which is like ha_scan_time()
but also adds the cost of the where clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE).
- Added small cost for creating temporary table for
materialization. This causes some very small tables to use scan
instead of materialization.
- Added checking of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) of the
accepted rows to ROR costs in get_best_ror_intersect()
- Removed '- 0.001' from 'join->best_read' and optimize_straight_join()
to ensure that the 'Last_query_cost' status variable contains the
same value as the one that was calculated by the optimizer.
- Take avg_io_cost() into account in handler::keyread_time() and
handler::read_time(). This should have no effect as it's 1.0 by
default, except for heap that overrides these functions.
- Some 'ref_or_null' accesses changed to 'range' because of cost
adjustments (main.order_by)
- Added scan type "scan_with_join_cache" for optimizer_trace. This is
just to show in the trace what kind of scan was used.
- When using 'scan_with_join_cache' take into account number of
preceding tables (as have to restore all fields for all previous
table combination when checking the where clause)
The new cost added is:
(row_combinations * ROW_COPY_COST * number_of_cached_tables).
This increases the cost of join buffering in proportion of the
number of tables in the join buffer. One effect is that full scans
are now done earlier as the cost is then smaller.
(main.join_outer_innodb, main.greedy_optimizer)
- Removed the usage of 'worst_seeks' in cost_for_index_read as it
caused wrong plans to be created; It prefered JT_EQ_REF even if it
would be much more expensive than a full table scan. A related
issue was that worst_seeks only applied to full lookup, not to
clustered or index only lookups, which is not consistent. This
caused some plans to use index scan instead of eq_ref (main.union)
- Changed federated block size from 4096 to 1500, which is the
typical size of an IO packet.
- Added costs for reading rows to Federated. Needed as there is no
caching of rows in the federated engine.
- Added ha_innobase::rnd_pos_time() cost function.
- A lot of extra things added to optimizer trace
- More costs, especially for materialization and index_merge.
- Make lables more uniform
- Fixed a lot of minor bugs
- Added 'trace_started()' around a lot of trace blocks.
- When calculating ORDER BY with LIMIT cost for using an index
the cost did not take into account the number of row retrivals
that has to be done or the cost of comparing the rows with the
WHERE clause. The cost calculated would be just a fraction of
the real cost. Now we calculate the cost as we do for ranges
and 'ref'.
- 'Using index for group-by' is used a bit more than before as
now take into account the WHERE clause cost when comparing
with 'ref' and prefer the method with fewer row combinations.
(main.group_min_max).
Bugs fixed:
- Fixed that we don't calculate TIME_FOR_COMPARE twice for some plans,
like in optimize_straight_join() and greedy_search()
- Fixed bug in save_explain_data where we could test for the wrong
index when displaying 'Using index'. This caused some old plans to
show 'Using index'. (main.subselect_innodb, main.subselect2)
- Fixed bug in get_best_ror_intersect() where 'min_cost' was not
updated, and the cost we compared with was not the one that was
used.
- Fixed very wrong cost calculation for priority queues in
check_if_pq_applicable(). (main.order_by now correctly uses priority
queue)
- When calculating cost of EQ_REF or REF, we added the cost of
comparing the WHERE clause with the found rows, not all row
combinations. This made ref and eq_ref to be regarded way to cheap
compared to other access methods.
- FORCE INDEX cost calculation didn't take into account clustered or
covered indexes.
- JT_EQ_REF cost was estimated as avg_io_cost(), which is half the
cost of a JT_REF key. This may be true for InnoDB primary key, but
not for other unique keys or other engines. Now we use handler
function to calculate the cost, which allows us to handle
consistently clustered, covered keys and not covered keys.
- ha_start_keyread() didn't call extra_opt() if keyread was already
enabled but still changed the 'keyread' variable (which is wrong).
Fixed by not doing anything if keyread is already enabled.
- multi_range_read_info_cost() didn't take into account io_cost when
calculating the cost of ranges.
- fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order() used the wrong
record_count when calling best_access_path() for SJ_OPT_FIRST_MATCH
and SJ_OPT_LOOSE_SCAN.
- Hash joins didn't provide correct best_cost to the upper level, which
means that the cost for hash_joins more expensive than calculated
in best_access_path (a difference of 10x * TIME_OF_COMPARE).
This is fixed in the new code thanks to that we now include
TIME_OF_COMPARE cost in 'read_time'.
Other things:
- Added some 'if (thd->trace_started())' to speed up code
- Removed not used function Cost_estimate::is_zero()
- Simplified testing of HA_POS_ERROR in get_best_ror_intersect().
(No cost changes)
- Moved ha_start_keyread() from join_read_const_table() to join_read_const()
to enable keyread for all types of JT_CONST tables.
- Made a few very short functions inline in handler.h
Notes:
- In main.rowid_filter the join order of order and lineitem is swapped.
This is because the cost of doing a range fetch of lineitem(98 rows) is
almost as big as the whole join of order,lineitem. The filtering will
also ensure that we only have to do very small key fetches of the rows
in lineitem.
- main.index_merge_myisam had a few changes where we are now using
less keys for index_merge. This is because index scans are now more
expensive than before.
- handler->optimizer_cache_cost is updated in ha_external_lock().
This ensures that it is up to date per statements.
Not an optimal solution (for locked tables), but should be ok for now.
- 'DELETE FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > 0 ORDER BY t1.a' does not take cost of
filesort into consideration when table scan is chosen.
(main.myisam_explain_non_select_all)
- perfschema.table_aggregate_global_* has changed because an update
on a table with 1 row will now use table scan instead of key lookup.
TODO in upcomming commits:
- Fix selectivity calculation for ranges with and without filtering and
when there is a ref access but scan is chosen.
For this we have to store the lowest known value for
'accepted_records' in the OPT_RANGE structure.
- Change that records_read does not include filtered rows.
- test_if_cheaper_ordering() needs to be updated to properly calculate
costs. This will fix tests like main.order_by_innodb,
main.single_delete_update
- Extend get_range_limit_read_cost() to take into considering
cost_for_index_read() if there where no quick keys. This will reduce
the computed cost for ORDER BY with LIMIT in some cases.
(main.innodb_ext_key)
- Fix that we take into account selectivity when counting the number
of rows we have to read when considering using a index table scan to
resolve ORDER BY.
- Add new calculation for rnd_pos_time() where we take into account the
benefit of reading multiple rows from the same page.
This patch causes no changes in costs or result files.
Changes:
- Store row compare cost separately in Cost_estimate::comp_cost
- Store cost of fetching rows separately in OPT_RANGE
- Use range->fetch_cost instead of adjust_quick_cost(total_cost)
This was done to simplify cost calculation in sql_select.cc:
- We can use range->fetch_cost directly without having to call
adjust_quick_cost(). adjust_quick_cost() is now removed.
Other things:
- Removed some not used functions in Cost_estimate
- Before any multiple add() calls, always use (if trace_started()).
- Add unlikely() around all tests of trace_started().
- Change trace.add(); trace.add(); to trace.add().add();
- When trace.add() goes over several line, use the following formating:
trace.
add(xxx).
add(yyy).
add(zzz);
This format was choosen after a discussion between Sergei Petrunia and
me as it looks similar indepedent if 'trace' is an object or a
pointer. It also more suitable for an editors auto-indentation.
Other things:
Added DBUG_ASSERT(thd->trace_started()) to a few functions that should
only be called if trace is enabled.
"use_roworder_index_merge: true" changed to "use_sort_index_merge: false"
As the original output was often not correct.
Also fixed the related 'cause' to be correct.
In best_access_path() print the cost (and number of rows) before
checking if it the plan should be used. This removes the need to print
the cost in two places.
Changed a few "read_time" tags to "cost".
The old code did not't correctly add TIME_FOR_COMPARE to rows that are
part of the scan that will be compared with the attached where clause.
Now the cost calculation for hash join and full join cache join are
identical except for HASH_FANOUT (10%)
The cost for a join with keys is now also uniform.
The total cost for a using a key for lookup is calculated in one place as:
(cost_of_finding_rows_through_key(records) + records/TIME_FOR_COMPARE)*
record_count_of_previous_row_combinations + startup_cost
startup_cost is the cost of a creating a temporary table (if needed)
Best_cost now includes the cost of comparing all WHERE clauses and also
cost of joining with previous row combinations.
Other things:
- Optimizer trace is now printing the total costs, including testing the
WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) and comparing with all previous rows.
- In optimizer trace, include also total cost of query together with the
final join order. This makes it easier to find out where the cost was
calculated.
- Old code used filter even if the cost for it was higher than not using a
filter. This is not corrected.
- When rebasing on 10.11, I noticed some changes to access_cost_factor
calculation. These changes was not picked as the coming changes
to filtering will make that code obsolete.
Having rows >= 1.0 helps ensure that when we calculate total rows of joins
the number of resulting rows will not be less after the join.
Changes in test cases:
- Join order change for some tables with few records
- 'Filtered' is much higher for tables with few rows, as 1 row is a high
procent of a table with few rows.
Fixed also that the 'with_found_constraint parameter' to
matching_candidates_in_table() is as documented: It is now true only
if there is a reference to a previous table in the WHERE condition for
the current examined table (as it was originally documented)
Changes in test results:
- Filtered was 25% smaller for some queries (expected).
- Some join order changed (probably because the tables had very few rows).
- Some more table scans, probably because there would be fewer returned
rows.
- Some tests exposes a bug that if there is more filtered rows, then the
cost for table scan will be higher. This will be fixed in a later commit.
calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table() is largely rewritten:
- Process keys in the order of rows found, smaller ranges first. If two
ranges has equal number of rows, use the one with more key parts.
This helps us to mark more used fields to not be used for further
selectivity calculations. See cmp_quick_ranges().
- Ignore keys with fields that where used by previous keys
- Don't use rec_per_key[] to calculate selectivity for smaller
secondary key parts. This does not work as rec_per_key[] value
is calculated in the context of the previous key parts, not for the
key part itself. The one exception is if the previous key parts
are all constants.
Other things:
- Ensure that select->cond_selectivity is always between 0 and 1.
- Ensure that select->opt_range_condition_rows is never updated to
a higher value. It is initially set to the number of rows in table.
- We now store in table->opt_range_condition_rows the lowest number of
rows that any row-read-method has found so far. Before it was only done
for QUICK_SELECT_I::QS_TYPE_ROR_UNION and
QUICK_SELECT_I::QS_TYPE_INDEX_MERGE.
Now it is done for a lot more methods. See
calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table() for details.
- Calculate and use selectivity for the first key part of a multiple key
part if the first key part is a constant.
WHERE key1_part1=5 and key2_part1=5. IF key1 is used, then we can still
use selectivity for key2
Changes in test results:
- 'filtered' is slightly changed, usually to something slightly smaller.
- A few cases where for group by queries the table order changed. This was
because the number of resulting rows from a group by query with MIN/MAX
is now set to be smaller.
- A few index was changed as we now prefer index with more key parts if
the number of resulting rows is the same.
No code logic changes was done
a -> gain
b -> cost_of_building_range_filter
a_adj -> gain_adj
r -> row_combinations
Other things:
- Optimized the layout of class Range_rowid_filter_cost_info.
One effect was that I moved key_no to the private section to get
better alignment and had to introduce a get_key_no() function.
- Indentation changes in rowid_filter.cc to avoid long rows.
- Updated comments
- Added some extra DEBUG
- Indentation changes and break long lines
- Trivial code changes like:
- Combining 2 statements in one
- Reorder DBUG lines
- Use a variable to store a pointer that is used multiple times
- Moved declaration of variables to start of loop/function
- Removed dead or commented code
- Removed wrong DBUG_EXECUTE code in best_extension_by_limited_search()
Enable use of Rowid Filter optimization with eq_ref access.
Use the following assumptions:
- Assume index-only access cost is 50% of non-index-only access cost.
- Take into account that "Eq_ref access cache" reduces the number of
lookups eq_ref access will make.
= This means the number of Rowid Filter checks is reduced also
= Eq_ref access cost is computed using that assumption (see
prev_record_reads() call), so we should use it in all cost '
computations.
Enable use of Rowid Filter optimization with eq_ref access.
Use the following assumptions:
- Assume index-only access cost is 50% of non-index-only access cost.
- Take into account that "Eq_ref access cache" reduces the number of
lookups eq_ref access will make.
= This means the number of Rowid Filter checks is reduced also
= Eq_ref access cost is computed using that assumption (see
prev_record_reads() call), so we should use it in all cost '
computations.
