1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-07 00:04:31 +03:00
Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oleksandr Byelkin
9e1fb104a3 Merge tag '11.4' into 11.6
MariaDB 11.4.4 release
2024-11-08 07:17:00 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
69d033d165 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-10-29 16:42:46 +01:00
Yuchen Pei
cd5577ba4a Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-10-15 16:00:44 +11:00
Thirunarayanan Balathandayuthapani
5777d9f282 MDEV-35116 InnoDB fails to set error index for HA_ERR_NULL_IN_SPATIAL
- InnoDB fails to set the index information or index number
for the spatial index error HA_ERR_NULL_IN_SPATIAL.

row_build_spatial_index_key(): Initialize the tmp_mbr array completely.

check_if_supported_inplace_alter(): Fix the spelling mistake of alter
2024-10-14 14:28:24 +05:30
Alexander Barkov
36eba98817 MDEV-19123 Change default charset from latin1 to utf8mb4
Changing the default server character set from latin1 to utf8mb4.
2024-07-11 10:21:07 +04:00
Monty
3fa99f0c0e Change cost for REF to take into account cost for 1 extra key read_next
The main difference in code path between EQ_REF and REF is that for
REF we have to do an extra read_next on the index to check that there
is no more matching rows.

Before this patch we added a preference of EQ_REF by ensuring that REF
would always estimate to find at least 2 rows.

This patch adds the cost of the extra key read_next to REF access and
removes the code that limited REF to at least 2 rows. For some queries
this can have a big effect as the total estimated rows will be halved
for each REF table with 1 rows.

multi_range cost calculations are also changed to take into account
the difference between EQ_REF and REF.

The effect of the patch to the test suite:
- About 80 test case changed
- Almost all changes where for EXPLAIN where estimated rows for REF
  where changed from 2 to 1.
- A few test cases using explain extended had a change of 'filtered'.
  This is because of the estimated rows are now closer to the
  calculated selectivity.
- A very few test had a change of table order.
  This is because the change of estimated rows from 2 to 1 or the small
  cost change for REF
  (main.subselect_sj_jcl6, main.group_by, main.dervied_cond_pushdown,
  main.distinct, main.join_nested, main.order_by, main.join_cache)
- No key statistics and the estimated rows are now smaller which cased
  estimated filtering to be lower.
  (main.subselect_sj_mat)
- The number of total rows are halved.
  (main.derived_cond_pushdown)
- Plans with 1 row changed to use RANGE instead of REF.
  (main.group_min_max)
- ALL changed to REF
  (main.key_diff)
- Key changed from ref + index_only to PRIMARY key for InnoDB, as
  OPTIMIZER_ROW_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_ROW_NEXT_FIND_COST is smaller than
  OPTIMIZER_KEY_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST.
  (main.join_outer_innodb)
- Cost changes printouts
  (main.opt_trace*)
- Result order change
  (innodb_gis.rtree)
2023-02-10 12:58:50 +02:00
Monty
727491b72a Added test cases for preceding test
This includes all test changes from
"Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds"
and forwards.

Some of the things that caused changes in the result files:

- As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to
  easier find out where things where wrong.
- MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because
  of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY.
  - Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was
    changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen.
- 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to
  something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into
  account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they
  where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that
  we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries
  using FIRSTMATCH.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
  This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out.
- Table orders has changed because more accurate costs.
- 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or
   'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost.
- index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't
  have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read.
  This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause
  but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
- Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore
  (It's a table scan, not an index scan).
- For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2,
  which can be seen in EXPLAIN.
- More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this
  optimization is now more correct (lower).
- A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would
  access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a
  clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary.
  (main.stat_tables_innodb)

Notes:

- There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in
  the main.greedy_optimizer test.  However examining the test results
  it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more
  chained together) so I assume this is ok.
- I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected
  changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where
  faster.  (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
2023-02-03 00:00:35 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
44fd2c4b24 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-09-20 16:53:20 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
18795f5512 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-09-13 16:36:38 +03:00
Alexander Barkov
f1544424de MDEV-29446 Change SHOW CREATE TABLE to display default collation 2022-09-12 22:10:39 +04:00
Varun Gupta
f691d9865b MDEV-7317: Make an index ignorable to the optimizer
This feature adds the functionality of ignorability for indexes.
Indexes are not ignored be default.

To control index ignorability explicitly for a new index,
use IGNORE or NOT IGNORE as part of the index definition for
CREATE TABLE, CREATE INDEX, or ALTER TABLE.

Primary keys (explicit or implicit) cannot be made ignorable.

The table INFORMATION_SCHEMA.STATISTICS get a new column named IGNORED that
would store whether an index needs to be ignored or not.
2021-03-04 22:50:00 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
bd3c8f47cd Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2020-03-20 22:06:55 +02:00
Alexey Botchkov
a0ce62f804 MDEV-14057 InnoDB GIS tests fail.
Tests fixed.
MBR::Within() function fixed.
2020-03-18 13:55:21 +04:00
Varun Gupta
93c360e3a5 MDEV-15253: Default optimizer setting changes for MariaDB 10.4
use_stat_tables= PREFERABLY
optimizer_use_condition_selectivity= 4
2018-12-09 09:22:00 +05:30
Alexey Botchkov
ea876b39f3 MDEV-13716 point_big test fails in 10.2.
Implementation for the reverse spatial predicates was lost
        somehow.
2017-09-12 11:58:49 +04:00
Alexey Botchkov
a60bdcba64 MDEV-12462 SPATIAL index fails to work with CONTAINS.
Flags are wrongly set for MBR_CONTAINS/MBR_WITHIN functions.
2017-05-02 16:24:42 +04:00
Allen Lai
07e88be5b7 Bug#23044098 INSERT OF GIS DATA INTO RTREE HITS ASSERT IN RTR_CUR_RESTORE_POSITION_FUNC()
This bug is caused by missing page number field when store btree cursor.

Reviewed-by: Jimmy Yang<jimmy.yang@oracle.com>
RB: 14617
2017-04-26 23:03:30 +03:00
Sergei Golubchik
4a5d25c338 Merge branch '10.1' into 10.2 2016-12-29 13:23:18 +01:00
Alexey Botchkov
cc577f81b8 MDEV-11041 Innodb_gis/ tests taken from MySQL fail.
Some fixes made in innodb and item_create.cc.
        Adapted Innodb-GIS tests moved to MariaDB.
2016-11-29 16:25:22 +04:00