Fix a regression on test galera_sr.GCF-572 introduced by commit
c9a6adba. This commit partially reverted a trivial test fix for
the galera_sr.GCF-572 test (commit 11ef59fb), which was targeted
at 10.6.
This is backporting the fix from commit 11ef59fb fix to 10.5, so
that the test stays the same all versions >= 10.5.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
Problem was that initial GTID was set on wsrep_before_prepare
out-of-order. In practice GTID was set to same as previous
executed transaction GTID. In recovery valid GTID was found
from prepared transaction and this transaction is committed
leading to fact that same GTID was executed twice.
This is fixed by setting invalid GTID at wsrep_before_prepare
and later in wsrep_before_commit actual correct GTID is set
and this setting is done while we are in commit monitor i.e.
assigment is done in order of replication.
In recovery if prepared transaction is found we check its
GTID, if it is invalid transaction will be rolled back
and if it is valid it will be committed.
Initialize gtid seqno from recovered seqno when
bootstrapping a new cluster.
Added two test cases for both mariabackup and rsync SST methods
to show that GTIDs remain consistent on cluster and that
all expected rows are in the table.
Added tests for wsrep GTID recovery with binlog on and off.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
* rpl.rpl_system_versioning_partitions updated for MDEV-32188
* innodb.row_size_error_log_warnings_3 changed error for MDEV-33658
(checks are done in a different order)
Fix wrong assertion: function wsrep_restore_kill_after_commit()
asserts `WSREP(thd)`, however for the caller (wsrep_after_statement())
it is enough that the THD has an active transaction. Fixed the
assertion accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
Make galera_sr.GCF-572 behave the same with and without option
innodb-snapshot-isolation. It is sufficient to remove a SELECT
statement from a transaction to delay the creation of the read
view in innodb. Avoiding the detection of a write-write conflict
under innodb-snapshot-isolation.
Ignore snapshot isolation conflict during fragment removal, before
streaming transaction commits. This happens when a streaming
transaction creates a read view that precedes the INSERTion of
fragments into the streaming_log table. Fragments are INSERTed
using a different transaction. These fragment are then removed
as part of COMMIT of the streaming transaction. This fragment
removal operation could fail when the fragments were not part
the transaction's read view, thus violating snapshot isolation.
From the very beginning, the default InnoDB transaction isolation level
REPEATABLE READ does not correspond to any well formed definition.
The main issue is the lack of write/write conflict detection.
To fix that and to make REPEATABLE READ correspond to Snapshot Isolation,
b8a6719889 introduced the Boolean
session variable innodb_snapshot_isolation. It was disabled by default
in order not to break any user applications.
In a new major version of MariaDB Server, we had better enable this
parameter by default.
Applied SR transaction on the child table was not BF aborted by TOI running
on the parent table for several reasons:
Although SR correctly collected FK-referenced keys to parent, TOI in Galera
disregards common certification index and simply sets itself to depend on
the latest certified write set seqno.
Since this write set was the fragment of SR transaction, TOI was allowed to
run in parallel with SR presuming it would BF abort the latter.
At the same time, DML transactions in the server don't grab MDL locks on
FK-referenced tables, thus parent table wasn't protected by an MDL lock from
SR and it couldn't provoke MDL lock conflict for TOI to BF abort SR transaction.
In InnoDB, DDL transactions grab shared MDL locks on child tables, which is not
enough to trigger MDL conflict in Galera.
InnoDB-level Wsrep patch didn't contain correct conflict resolution logic due to
the fact that it was believed MDL locking should always produce conflicts correctly.
The fix brings conflict resolution rules similar to MDL-level checks to InnoDB,
thus accounting for the problematic case.
Apart from that, wsrep_thd_is_SR() is patched to return true only for executing
SR transactions. It should be safe as any other SR state is either the same as
for any single write set (thus making the two logically equivalent), or it reflects
an SR transaction as being aborting or prepared, which is handled separately in
BF-aborting logic, and for regular execution path it should not matter at all.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
Test was waiting INSERT-clause to make rollback but
wait_condition was too tight. State could be
Freeing items or Rollback. Fixed wait_condition
to expect one of them.
Fix function `remove_fragment()` in wsrep_schema so that no error is
raised if the fragment to be removed is not found in the
wsrep_streaming_log table. This is necessary to handle the case where
streaming transaction in idle state is BF aborted. This may result in
the case where the rollbacker thread successfully removes the
transaction's fragments, followed by the applier's attempt to remove
the same fragments. Causing the node to leave the cluster after
reporting a "Failed to apply write set" error.
Signed-off-by: Julius Goryavsky <julius.goryavsky@mariadb.com>
