Fix some random test failures following MDEV-32168 push.
Don't blindly set $rpl_only_running_threads in many places. Instead explicit
stop only the IO or SQL thread, as appropriate. Setting it interfered with
rpl_end.inc in some cases. Rather than clearing it afterwards, better to
not set it at all when it is not needed, removing ambiguity in the test
about the state of the replication threads.
Don't fail the test if include/stop_slave_io.inc finds an error in the IO
thread after stop. Such errors can be simply because slave stop happened in
the middle of the IO thread's initial communication with the master.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>
This commit makes replicas crash-safe by default by changing the
Using_Gtid value to be Slave_Pos on a fresh slave start and after
RESET SLAVE is issued. If the primary server does not support GTIDs
(i.e., version < 10), the replica will fall back to Using_Gtid=No on
slave start and after RESET SLAVE.
The following additional informational messages/warnings are added:
1. When Using_Gtid is automatically changed. That is, if RESET
SLAVE reverts Using_Gtid back to Slave_Pos, or Using_Gtid is
inferred to No from a CHANGE MASTER TO given with log coordinates
without MASTER_USE_GTID.
2. If options are ignored in CHANGE MASTER TO. If CHANGE MASTER TO
is given with log coordinates, yet also specifies
MASTER_USE_GTID=Slave_Pos, a warning message is given that the log
coordinate options are ignored.
Additionally, an MTR macro has been added for RESET SLAVE,
reset_slave.inc, which provides modes/options for resetting a slave
in log coordinate or gtid modes. When in log coordinates mode, the
macro will execute CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_USE_GTID=No after the
RESET SLAVE command. When in GTID mode, an extra parameter,
reset_slave_keep_gtid_state, can be set to reset or preserve the
value of gtid_slave_pos.
Reviewed By:
===========
Andrei Elkin <andrei.elkin@mariadb.com>
MDEV-21810 MBR: Unexpected "Unsafe statement" warning for unsafe IODKU
MDEV-17614 fixes to replication unsafety for INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE
on two or more unique key table left a flaw. The fixes checked the
safety condition per each inserted record with the idea to catch a user-created
value to an autoincrement column and when that succeeds the autoincrement column
would become the source of unsafety too.
It was not expected that after a duplicate error the next record's
write_set may become different and the unsafe decision for that
specific record will be computed to screw the Query's binlogging
state and when @@binlog_format is MIXED nothing gets bin-logged.
This case has been already fixed in 10.5.2 by 91ab42a823 that
relocated/optimized THD::decide_logging_format_low() out of the record insert
loop. The safety decision is computed once and at the right time.
Pertinent parts of the commit are cherry-picked.
Also a spurious warning about unsafety is removed when MIXED
@@binlog_format; original MDEV-17614 test result corrected.
The original test of MDEV-17614 is extended and made more readable.
Problem:-
When mysql executes INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY INSERT, the storage engine checks
if the inserted row would generate a duplicate key error. If yes, it returns
the existing row to mysql, mysql updates it and sends it back to the storage
engine.When the table has more than one unique or primary key, this statement
is sensitive to the order in which the storage engines checks the keys.
Depending on this order, the storage engine may determine different rows
to mysql, and hence mysql can update different rows.The order that the
storage engine checks keys is not deterministic. For example, InnoDB checks
keys in an order that depends on the order in which indexes were added to
the table. The first added index is checked first. So if master and slave
have added indexes in different orders, then slave may go out of sync.
Solution:-
Make INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE unsafe while using stmt or mixed format
When there is more then one unique key.
Although there is two exception.
1. Auto Increment key is not counted because Innodb will get gap lock for
failed Insert and concurrent insert will get a next increment value. But if
user supplies auto inc value it can be unsafe.
2. Count only unique keys for which insertion is performed.
So this patch also addresses the bug id #72921
