1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-07 00:04:31 +03:00
Commit Graph

2894 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitry Shulga
ef9adb569e MDEV-32694: ASAN errors in Binary_string::alloced_length / reset_stmt_params
Anonymous block is represented internally by the class sp_head,
so every statement inside an anonymous block is a SP instruction.
On the other hand, the anonymous block specified in the FROM clause of
the PREPARE statement is treated as a single statement. In result,
all parameter markers (represented by the character ?) are parts of
the anonymous block specified in the prepared statement and at the same
time parameter are markers, internally represented by instances of
the class Item_param and distributed among SP instructions representing
SQL statements (every SQL statement is represented by an instance of
the class sp_instr_stmt)

In case table metadata changed on running an anonymous block in prepared
statement mode, only SP instruction's statement is re-parsed. Before
re-parsing a SP's statement, all items are cleaned up including
instances of the class Item_param that represent positional parameters.

Unfortunately, this leads to presence of a dangling pointer in
Prepared_statement::param_array that references to the deleted
Item_param while invoking reset_stmt_params happening on every execution
of a prepared statement.

To fix the issue, no instances of Item_param created on re-parsings
a statement for failed SP instruction, rather instances of Item_param
left from first time parsing are re-used. As a consequence, all pointers
to instances of the class Item_param stored in the array
Prepared_statememt::param_array and possibly spread along the code base
  (e.g. select_lex->limit_params.select_limit)
still point to valid Items.
2025-07-02 17:50:24 +07:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
a8d4642375 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.4 2025-04-26 10:53:02 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4d41ec081e Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2025-04-26 10:47:03 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
19644f6821 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2025-04-26 10:41:52 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4fc9dc84b0 MDEV-32086 (part 2) Server crash when inserting from derived table containing insert target table
Get rid of need of matherialization for usual INSERT (cache results in
Item_cache* if needed)

- subqueries in VALUE do not see new records in the table we are
  inserting to
- subqueries in RETIRNING prohibited to use the table we are inserting to
2025-04-25 15:10:36 +02:00
Aleksey Midenkov
a96c094d1b MDEV-25012 Server crash in find_field_in_tables, Assertion `name'
failed in find_field_in_table_ref

The main crash with segfault in find_field_in_tables() was fixed by
6aa47fae30 (MDEV-35276). This fix is for debug assertion.

Since Item_default_value is also Item_field there is nothing to be
done except adding DEFAULT_VALUE_ITEM type check.
2025-04-21 20:50:24 +02:00
Alexander Barkov
b7d67ceb5f MDEV-36047 Package body variables are not allowed as FETCH targets
It was not possible to use a package body variable as a
fetch target:

CREATE PACKAGE BODY pkg AS
  vc INT := 0;
  FUNCTION f1 RETURN INT AS
    CURSOR cur IS SELECT 1 AS c FROM DUAL;
  BEGIN
    OPEN cur;
    FETCH cur INTO vc; -- this returned "Undeclared variable: vc" error.
    CLOSE cur;
    RETURN vc;
  END;
END;

FETCH assumed that all fetch targets reside of the same sp_rcontext
instance with the cursor. This patch fixes the problem.
Now a cursor and its fetch target can reside in different sp_rcontext
instances.

Details:

- Adding a helper class sp_rcontext_addr
  (a combination of Sp_rcontext_handler pointer and an offset in the rcontext)

- Adding a new class sp_fetch_target deriving from sp_rcontext_addr.
  Fetch targets in "FETCH cur INTO target1, target2 ..." are now collected
  into this structure instead of sp_variable.
  sp_variable cannot be used any more to store fetch targets,
  because it does not have a pointer to Sp_rcontext_handler
  (it only has the current rcontext offset).

- Removing members sp_instr_set members m_rcontext_handler and m_offset.
  Deriving sp_instr_set from sp_rcontext_addr instead.

- Renaming sp_instr_cfetch member  "List<sp_variable> m_varlist"
  to "List<sp_fetch_target> m_fetch_target_list".

- Fixing LEX::sp_add_cfetch() to return the pointer to the
  created sp_fetch_target instance (instead of returning bool).
  This helps to make the grammar in sql_yacc.c simpler

- Renaming LEX::sp_add_cfetch() to LEX::sp_add_instr_cfetch(),
  as `if(sp_add_cfetch())` changed its meaning to the opposite,
  to avoid automatic wrong merge from earlier versions.

- Chaning the "List<sp_variable> *vars" parameter to sp_cursor::fetch
  to have the data type "List<sp_fetch_target> *".

- Changing the data type of "List<sp_variable> &vars" in
  sp_cursor::Select_fetch_into_spvars::send_data_to_variable_list()
  to "List<sp_fetch_target> &".

- Adding THD helper methods get_rcontext() and get_variable().

- Moving the code from sql_yacc.yy into a new LEX method
  LEX::make_fetch_target().

- Simplifying the grammar in sql_yacc.yy using the new LEX method.
  Changing the data type of the bison rule sp_fetch_list from "void"
  to "List<sp_fetch_target> *".
2025-02-09 13:56:19 +04:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
c770bce898 Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-10-30 15:11:17 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
69d033d165 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-10-29 16:42:46 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
3d0fb15028 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-10-29 15:24:38 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f00711bba2 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-10-29 14:20:03 +01:00
Monty
4955f6018a MDEV-29351 SIGSEGV when doing forward reference of item in select list
The reason for the crash was the code assumed that
SELECT_LEX.ref_pointer_array would be initialized with zero, which was
not the case. This cause the test of
if (!select->ref_pointer_array[counter]) in item.cc to be unpredictable
and causes crashes.

Fixed by zero-filling ref_pointer_array on allocation.
2024-10-16 17:24:46 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
b53b81e937 Merge 11.2 into 11.4 2024-10-03 14:32:14 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
12a91b57e2 Merge 10.11 into 11.2 2024-10-03 13:24:43 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
63913ce5af Merge 10.6 into 10.11 2024-10-03 10:55:08 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
7e0afb1c73 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2024-10-03 09:31:39 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
8d810e9426 MDEV-29537 Creation of view with UNION and SELECT ... FOR UPDATE in definition is failed with error
lock_type is writen in the last SELECT of the unit even if it parsed last,
so it should be printed last from the last select of the unit.
2024-10-01 11:07:45 +02:00
Yuchen Pei
d002b1f503 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-09-09 11:34:19 +10:00
Yuchen Pei
60b93cdd30 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-09-06 13:52:57 +10:00
Yuchen Pei
2c3e07df47 MDEV-34447: Memory leakage is detected on running the test main.ps against the server 11.1
The memory leak happened on second execution of a prepared statement
that runs UPDATE statement with correlated subquery in right hand side of
the SET clause. In this case, invocation of the method
  table->stat_records()
could return the zero value that results in going into the 'if' branch
that handles impossible where condition. The issue is that this condition
branch missed saving of leaf tables that has to be performed as first
condition optimization activity. Later the PS statement memory root
is marked as read only on finishing first time execution of the prepared
statement. Next time the same statement is executed it hits the assertion
on attempt to allocate a memory on the PS memory root marked as read only.
This memory allocation takes place by the sequence of the following
invocations:
 Prepared_statement::execute
  mysql_execute_command
   Sql_cmd_dml::execute
    Sql_cmd_update::execute_inner
     Sql_cmd_update::update_single_table
      st_select_lex::save_leaf_tables
       List<TABLE_LIST>::push_back

To fix the issue, add the flag SELECT_LEX::leaf_tables_saved to control
whether the method SELECT_LEX::save_leaf_tables() has to be called or
it has been already invoked and no more invocation required.

Similar issue could take place on running the DELETE statement with
the LIMIT clause in PS/SP mode. The reason of memory leak is the same as for
UPDATE case and be fixed in the same way.
2024-09-06 11:41:58 +10:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
1640c9b06e Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-08-04 17:27:48 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
dced6cbdb6 Merge branch '11.1' into 11.2 2024-08-03 09:50:16 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
80abd847da Merge branch '10.11' into 11.1 2024-08-03 09:32:42 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
0fe39d368a Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-07-22 15:14:50 +02:00
Yuchen Pei
f071b7620b Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-07-16 15:54:22 +08:00
Galina Shalygina
a5e4c34991 MDEV-32608: Expression with constant subquery causes a crash in pushdown
from HAVING

The bug is caused by refixing of the constant subquery in pushdown from
HAVING into WHERE optimization.

Similarly to MDEV-29363 in the problematic query two references of the
constant subquery are used. After the pushdown one of the references of the
subquery is pushed into WHERE-clause and the second one remains as the part
of the HAVING-clause.
Before the represented fix, the constant subquery reference that was going to
be pushed into WHERE was cleaned up and fixed. That caused the changes of
the subquery itself and, therefore, changes for the second reference that
remained in HAVING. These changes caused a crash.

To fix this problem all constant objects that are going to be pushed into
WHERE should be marked with an IMMUTABLE_FL flag. Objects marked with this
flag are not cleaned up or fixed in the pushdown optimization.

Approved by Igor Babaev <igor@mariadb.com>
2024-07-11 11:05:32 +02:00
Dave Gosselin
02e38e2ece MDEV-33971 NAME_CONST in WHERE clause replaced by inner item
Improve performance of queries like
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE field = NAME_CONST('a', 4);
by, in this example, replacing the WHERE clause with field = 4
in the case of ref access.

The rewrite is done during fix_fields and we disambiguate this
case from other cases of NAME_CONST by inspecting where we are
in parsing.  We rely on THD::where to accomplish this.  To
improve performance there, we change the type of THD::where to
be an enumeration, so we can avoid string comparisons during
Item_name_const::fix_fields.  Consequently, this patch also
changes all usages of THD::where to conform likewise.
2024-07-10 17:23:43 -04:00
Alexander Barkov
5fb07d942b Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/11.2' into 11.4 2024-07-09 21:45:37 +04:00
Alexander Barkov
8aad19ddfc Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/11.1' into 11.2 2024-07-09 14:04:11 +04:00
Alexander Barkov
44af9bfc67 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/10.11' into 11.1 2024-07-09 10:45:47 +04:00
Alexander Barkov
4d71a117a3 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/10.6' into 10.11 2024-07-08 21:52:08 +04:00
Rex
b418b60ebf MDEV-30623 JSON_TABLE in subquery not correctly marked as correlated
st_select_lex::update_correlated_cache() fails to take JSON_TABLE
functions in subqueries into account.

Reviewed by Sergei Petrunia (sergey@mariadb.com)
2024-07-09 04:45:29 +11:00
Alexander Barkov
e56040fee8 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/10.5' into 10.6 2024-07-08 18:59:04 +04:00
Galina Shalygina
6cb896a639 MDEV-29363: Constant subquery causing a crash in pushdown optimization
The crash is caused by the attempt to refix the constant subquery during
pushdown from HAVING into WHERE optimization.

Every condition that is going to be pushed into WHERE clause is first
cleaned up, then refixed. Constant subqueries are not cleaned or refixed
because they will remain the same after refixing, so this complicated
procedure can be omitted for them (introduced in MDEV-21184).
Constant subqueries are marked with flag IMMUTABLE_FL, that helps to miss
the cleanup stage for them. Also they are marked as fixed, so refixing is
also not done for them.
Because of the multiple equality propagation several references to the same
constant subquery can exist in the condition that is going to be pushed
into WHERE. Before this patch, the problem appeared in the following way.
After the first reference to the constant subquery is processed, the flag
IMMUTABLE_FL for the constant subquery is disabled.
So, when the second reference to this constant subquery is processed, the
flag is already disabled and the subquery goes through the procedure of
cleaning and refixing. That causes a crash.

To solve this problem, IMMUTABLE_FL should be disabled only after all
references to the constant subquery are processed, so after the whole
condition that is going to be pushed is cleaned up and refixed.

Approved by Igor Babaev <igor@maridb.com>
2024-07-04 13:46:19 +02:00
Dmitry Shulga
e012407397 MDEV-34447: Memory leakage is detected on running the test main.ps against the server 11.1
The memory leak happened on second execution of a prepared statement
that runs UPDATE statement with correlated subquery in right hand side of
the SET clause. In this case, invocation of the method
  table->stat_records()
could return the zero value that results in going into the 'if' branch
that handles impossible where condition. The issue is that this condition
branch missed saving of leaf tables that has to be performed as first
condition optimization activity. Later the PS statement memory root
is marked as read only on finishing first time execution of the prepared
statement. Next time the same statement is executed it hits the assertion
on attempt to allocate a memory on the PS memory root marked as read only.
This memory allocation takes place by the sequence of the following
invocations:
 Prepared_statement::execute
  mysql_execute_command
   Sql_cmd_dml::execute
    Sql_cmd_update::execute_inner
     Sql_cmd_update::update_single_table
      st_select_lex::save_leaf_tables
       List<TABLE_LIST>::push_back

To fix the issue, add the flag SELECT_LEX::leaf_tables_saved to control
whether the method SELECT_LEX::save_leaf_tables() has to be called or
it has been already invoked and no more invocation required.

Similar issue could take place on running the DELETE statement with
the LIMIT clause in PS/SP mode. The reason of memory leak is the same as for
UPDATE case and be fixed in the same way.
2024-07-02 18:40:11 +07:00
Alexander Barkov
c4bf4ce948 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/11.2' into 11.4 2024-06-17 15:46:39 +04:00
Marko Mäkelä
a21e49cbcc Merge 11.1 into 11.2 2024-06-17 12:02:03 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
d34289a3e2 Merge 10.11 into 11.1 2024-06-17 09:21:50 +03:00
Alexander Barkov
76e0dc18b6 MDEV-34288 SET NAMES DEFAULT crashes mariadbd --collation-server=utf8mb4_unicode_ci
The @@global.character_set_client variable could erroneously be set
to a non-default collation of its character set, which further made
the `SET NAMES DEFAULT` statement crash the server.

Fixing the code to make sure that the global value these variables:
  @@character_set_client
  @@character_set_connection
  @@character_set_server
  @@character_set_database
  @@character_set_connection
point to the default compiled collations of the character set.
2024-06-04 12:38:43 +04:00
Yuchen Pei
2d3e2c58b6 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.1 2024-05-31 10:54:31 +10:00
Marko Mäkelä
22ba7e4ff8 Merge 10.6 into 10.11 2024-05-30 16:04:00 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
99b370e023 Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-05-21 19:38:51 +02:00
Dmitry Shulga
5e6c122427 MDEV-33769: Memory leak found in the test main.rownum run with --ps-protocol against a server built with the option -DWITH_PROTECT_STATEMENT_MEMROOT
A memory leak happens on the second execution of a query that run in PS mode
and uses the function ROWNUM().

A memory leak took place on allocation of an instance of the class Item_int
for storing a limit value that is performed at the function set_limit_for_unit
indirectly called from JOIN::optimize_inner. Typical trace to the place where
the memory leak occurred is below:
 JOIN::optimize_inner
  optimize_rownum
   process_direct_rownum_comparison
    set_limit_for_unit
     new (thd->mem_root) Item_int(thd, lim, MAX_BIGINT_WIDTH);

To fix this memory leak, calling of the function optimize_rownum()
has to be performed only once on first execution and never called
after that. To control it, the new data member
  first_rownum_optimization
added into the structure st_select_lex.
2024-05-13 17:07:48 +07:00
Sergei Golubchik
bf5da43e50 Merge branch '11.1' into 11.2 2024-05-13 10:00:26 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
f0a5412037 Merge branch '11.0' into 11.1 2024-05-13 09:52:30 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
f9807aadef Merge branch '10.11' into 11.0 2024-05-12 12:18:28 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
018d537ec1 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-04-22 15:23:10 +02:00
Dave Gosselin
a8a75ba2d0 Factor TABLE_LIST creation from add_table_to_list
Ideally our methods and functions should do one thing, do that well,
and do only that.  add_table_to_list does far more than adding a
table to a list, so this commit factors the TABLE_LIST creation out
to a new TABLE_LIST constructor.  It then uses placement new()
to create it in the correct memory area (result of thd->calloc).
Benefits of this approach:
 1. add_table_to_list now returns as early as possible on an error
 2. fewer side-effects incurred on creating the TABLE_LIST object
 3. TABLE_LIST won't be calloc'd if copy_to_db fails
 4. local declarations moved closer to their respective first uses
 5. improved code readability and logical flow
Also factored a couple of other functions to keep the happy path
more to the left, which makes them easier to follow at a glance.
2024-04-16 10:09:43 -04:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
fa69b085b1 Merge branch '11.3' into 11.4 2024-02-15 13:53:21 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
d21cb43db1 Merge branch '11.2' into 11.3 2024-02-04 16:42:31 +01:00