1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-07 00:04:31 +03:00
Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oleksandr Byelkin
a8d4642375 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.4 2025-04-26 10:53:02 +02:00
Aleksey Midenkov
837fad6e41 MDEV-31647 Stack looping and SIGSEGV in Item_args::walk_args on UPDATE
The problem is with window function which requires its own sorting but
it is impossible as table is updated while select is
progressing. That's it, multi-update queries do not use temporary
tables to store updated rows and substitute them at the end of the
query. Instead, updates are performed directly on the target table,
row by row, during query execution. MariaDB processes updates in a way
that ensures each row is updated only once, even if it matches
multiple conditions in the query. This behavior avoids redundant
updates and does not require intermediate storage in a temporary table.

The detailed cause of the loop invoked by window function was
explained by Yuchen Pei in MDEV-31647 comments.

The fix disables window functions for multi-update.

Note that MySQL throws ER_UPDATE_TABLE_USED in that case which is the
result of check_unique_table(). But this function is not used for
multi-update in MariaDB and this check cannot be done because some
level of SELECT expressions is allowed (MDEV-13911).
2025-04-21 21:13:52 +02:00
Igor Babaev
adc13e2c16 MDEV-31150 Crash on 2nd execution of update using mergeable derived table
This bug caused crashes of the server on the second execution of update
statements that used mergeable derived tables. The crashes happened in
the function multi_update_check_table_access() when the code tried to
dereference the pointer stored in field TABLE_LIST::TABLE for a mergeable
derived table. The fact is this field is set to NULL after the first
execution of the query. At the same any action performed by the function
is actually not needed for derived tables.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2023-07-26 23:11:17 -07:00
Igor Babaev
f33fc2fae5 MDEV-30539 EXPLAIN EXTENDED: no message with queries for DML statements
EXPLAIN EXTENDED for an UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT/REPLACE statement did not
produce the warning containing the text representation of the query
obtained after the optimization phase. Such warning was produced for
SELECT statements, but not for DML statements.
The patch fixes this defect of EXPLAIN EXTENDED for DML statements.
2023-03-25 12:36:59 -07:00
Igor Babaev
c912fd3b29 Fixes of MDEV-30538 and MDEV-30586 for 10.4 adjusted for 11.0.
The commits for MDEV-30538 and MDEV-30586 could not be cherry-picked into
11.0 separately.
2023-03-15 17:35:22 -07:00
Igor Babaev
88ca62dc68 MDEV-28965 Assertion failure when preparing UPDATE with derived table in WHERE
This patch fixes not only the assertion failure in the function
Field_iterator_table_ref::set_field_iterator() but also:
 - fixes the problem of forced materialization of derived tables used
   in subqueries contained in WHERE clauses of single-table and multi-table
   UPDATE and DELETE statements
 - fixes the problem of MDEV-17954 that prevented execution of multi-table
   DELETE statements if they use in their WHERE clauses references to
   the tables that are updated.

The patch must be considered a complement to the patch for MDEV-28883.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2023-03-15 17:35:22 -07:00
Marko Mäkelä
2e431ff7e6 Merge 10.11 into 11.0 2023-02-16 13:34:45 +02:00
Igor Babaev
bef20b5f36 MDEV-30538 Plans for SELECT and multi-table UPDATE/DELETE unexpectedly differ
This patch allowed transformation of EXISTS subqueries into equivalent
IN predicands at the top level of WHERE conditions for multi-table UPDATE
and DELETE statements. There was no reason to prohibit the transformation
for such statements. The transformation provides more opportunities of
using semi-join optimizations.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2023-02-03 11:17:03 -08:00
Sergei Petrunia
ffe0beca25 MDEV-30032: EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON output: print costs
Basic printout for join and table execution costs.
2023-02-03 11:01:24 +03:00
Lena Startseva
72ba96a48e MDEV-27691: make working view-protocol
Tests with checking metadata or that cannot be run with
the view-protocol are excluded from --view-protocol.
For tests that do not allow the use of an additional connection,
the util connection is disabled with "--disable_service_connection".
Also cases with bugs for --view-protocol are disabled.
2022-09-23 17:36:20 +07:00
Oleg Smirnov
40d9dbb28f MDEV-28246 Optimizer uses all partitions after upgrade to 10.3
Cause: a copy of the joined TABLE_LIST is created during multi_update::prepare
and TABLE::pos_in_table_list of the tables are set to point to the new
TABLE_LIST object. This prevents some optimization steps to perform correctly.
Solution: do not update pos_in_table_list during multi_update::prepare
2022-05-19 08:31:01 +04:00
Aleksey Midenkov
ff77a09bda MDEV-22464 Server crash on UPDATE with nested subquery
Uninitialized ref_pointer_array[] because setup_fields() got empty
fields list.  mysql_multi_update() for some reason does that by
substituting the fields list with empty total_list for the
mysql_select() call (looks like wrong merge since total_list is not
used anywhere else and is always empty). The fix would be to return
back the original fields list. But this fails update_use_source.test
case:

  --error ER_BAD_FIELD_ERROR
  update v1 set t1c1=2 order by 1;

Actually not failing the above seems to be ok.

The other fix would be to keep resolve_in_select_list false (and that
keeps outer context from being resolved in
Item_ref::fix_fields()). This fix is more consistent with how SELECT
behaves:

  --error ER_SUBQUERY_NO_1_ROW
  select a from t1 where a= (select 2 from t1 having (a = 3));

So this patch implements this fix.
2021-10-11 13:36:07 +03:00
Igor Babaev
e3a25793be MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 20:02:08 -07:00
Aleksey Midenkov
0932c5804d MDEV-20515 multi-update tries to position updated table by null reference
Cause

Join tmp table inserts null row because of OUTER JOIN, that's
expected. Since `multi_update::prepare2()` converted
`Item_temptable_rowid` into `Item_field` (28dbdf3)
`multi_update::send_data()` accesses join tmp record directly and
treats it as a normal row ignoring null status of ref field. NULL ref
field is then treated as normal in `multi_update::do_updates()` which
tries to position updated table by reference 0.

Note that reference 0 may be valid reference and the first row of
table can be wrongly updated (see multi_update.test).

Fix

Do not add row into multi-update tmp table in case of null ref
field. Join tmp table does not have null_row status at this time (as
well as `STATUS_NULL_ROW`) and cannot be skipped by these properties
(see first comment in multi_update::send_data()). But it has all null
fields (including the ref field).
2020-04-02 20:48:38 +03:00
Monty
a071e0e029 Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-09-03 13:17:32 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4a3d51c76c Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-06-14 07:36:47 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
c51f85f882 Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-05-12 17:20:23 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
28dbdf3d79 MDEV-14551 Can't find record in table on multi-table update with ORDER BY
preserve positions if the multi-update join is using tmp table:

* store positions in the tmp table if needed
  JOIN::add_fields_for_current_rowid()

* take positions from the tmp table, not from file->position():
  multi_update::prepare2()
2018-05-17 15:13:47 +02:00
Michael Widenius
a7abddeffa Create 'main' test directory and move 't' and 'r' there 2018-03-29 13:59:44 +03:00