1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-07 00:04:31 +03:00
Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oleksandr Byelkin
69d033d165 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-10-29 16:42:46 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
3a1cf2c85b MDEV-34679 ER_BAD_FIELD uses non-localizable substrings 2024-10-17 21:37:37 +02:00
Monty
727491b72a Added test cases for preceding test
This includes all test changes from
"Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds"
and forwards.

Some of the things that caused changes in the result files:

- As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to
  easier find out where things where wrong.
- MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because
  of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY.
  - Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was
    changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen.
- 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to
  something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into
  account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they
  where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that
  we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries
  using FIRSTMATCH.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
  This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out.
- Table orders has changed because more accurate costs.
- 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or
   'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost.
- index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't
  have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read.
  This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause
  but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer.
  (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
- Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore
  (It's a table scan, not an index scan).
- For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2,
  which can be seen in EXPLAIN.
- More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this
  optimization is now more correct (lower).
- A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would
  access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a
  clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary.
  (main.stat_tables_innodb)

Notes:

- There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in
  the main.greedy_optimizer test.  However examining the test results
  it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more
  chained together) so I assume this is ok.
- I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected
  changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where
  faster.  (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
2023-02-03 00:00:35 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
44fd2c4b24 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-09-20 16:53:20 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
18795f5512 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-09-13 16:36:38 +03:00
Alexander Barkov
f1544424de MDEV-29446 Change SHOW CREATE TABLE to display default collation 2022-09-12 22:10:39 +04:00
Varun Gupta
f691d9865b MDEV-7317: Make an index ignorable to the optimizer
This feature adds the functionality of ignorability for indexes.
Indexes are not ignored be default.

To control index ignorability explicitly for a new index,
use IGNORE or NOT IGNORE as part of the index definition for
CREATE TABLE, CREATE INDEX, or ALTER TABLE.

Primary keys (explicit or implicit) cannot be made ignorable.

The table INFORMATION_SCHEMA.STATISTICS get a new column named IGNORED that
would store whether an index needs to be ignored or not.
2021-03-04 22:50:00 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
efb8485d85 Merge 10.3 into 10.4, except for MDEV-20265
The MDEV-20265 commit e746f451d5
introduces DBUG_ASSERT(right_op == r_tbl) in
st_select_lex::add_cross_joined_table(), and that assertion would
fail in several tests that exercise joins. That commit was skipped
in this merge, and a separate fix of MDEV-20265 will be necessary in 10.4.
2019-08-23 08:06:17 +03:00
Anel Husakovic
888f685226 MDEV-20210 If you have an INVISIBLE VIRTUAL column, SHOW CREATE TABLE doesn't list it as INVISIBLE 2019-08-21 01:26:06 -07:00
Igor Babaev
37deed3f37 Merge branch '10.4' into bb-10.4-mdev16188 2019-02-03 18:41:18 -08:00
Igor Babaev
658128af43 MDEV-16188 Use in-memory PK filters built from range index scans
This patch contains a full implementation of the optimization
that allows to use in-memory rowid / primary filters built for range  
conditions over indexes. In many cases usage of such filters reduce  
the number of disk seeks spent for fetching table rows.

In this implementation the choice of what possible filter to be applied  
(if any) is made purely on cost-based considerations.

This implementation re-achitectured the partial implementation of
the feature pushed by Galina Shalygina in the commit
8d5a11122c.

Besides this patch contains a better implementation of the generic  
handler function handler::multi_range_read_info_const() that
takes into account gaps between ranges when calculating the cost of
range index scans. It also contains some corrections of the
implementation of the handler function records_in_range() for MyISAM.

This patch supports the feature for InnoDB and MyISAM.
2019-02-03 14:56:12 -08:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
d07a6e33dd Check that default() do not see invisible field. 2018-11-20 17:31:07 +01:00
Sachin
482d4da0a7 MDEV-15127 AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow in base_list::push_back ..
Problem:-
 If we try to run this query with -WITH_ASAN=ON compiled server
  CREATE TABLE t1 (i INT);
  SET debug_dbug="+d,test_completely_invisible,test_invisible_index";
  CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1;

 This will generate a stack buffer overflow error.
  ==8922==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address #ADDR
Analyze:-
 Error is generated on this line
       if (((*last)=new list_node(info, &end_of_list)))
 So info is our Key*, &end_of_list is global variable and last == #ADDR
 So last is suspicious variable. And last is the variable present in alter_info
 ->key_list. Now the question is how this key_list->last gets wrong/
 different stack variable. In the backtrace,  we can see that key_list is
 generated in mysql_create_table_like_table by calling
 mysql_preapre_alter_table_function and dummy key_list is created by
 mysql_create_like_table. In the end on mysql_prepare_alter_table we call
   alter_info->key_list.swap(new_key_list);
 So there is two options either key_list is empty or not empty , IF it is not
 empty then there is no issues last ptr is replaced by thd->mem_root (allocated ptr)
 So problem arises when key_list is empty. It swaps the dummy last ptr by
 mysql_prepare_alter_table declared ptr. which is wrong.

Solution:-
 We wont swap variable if list does not have any element.
2018-08-07 22:36:37 +05:30
Michael Widenius
a7abddeffa Create 'main' test directory and move 't' and 'r' there 2018-03-29 13:59:44 +03:00