1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2026-10-23 18:49:29 +03:00
Commit Graph

2128 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
forkfun
08eeb6a417 Merge branch '10.11' into '11.4' 2026-07-28 13:14:38 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
6225bd2659 MDEV-25813 ASAN errors in err_conv / field_unpack upon multi-UPDATE causing ER_DUP_ENTRY
InnoDB always frees allocated in record[0] blobs even
when reading into record[1].
Let's read into record[0] for consistency.
2026-07-24 17:06:41 +02:00
Jan Lindström
6f1204ad84 MDEV-39685 : galera multi table update crash
This is regression caused by MDEV-28750 commit 1f349968.

In multi-table update table list could contain tables
that are not yet opened because update does not really
change them. This can happen e.g. when update changes
table that is referenced by foreign key by table that
is not part of multi-table update.

Fixed by first checking is wsrep write set size limited.
If it is not multi-table update can continue normally.
If write set size is limited then check has update
updated both transactional and non-transactional tables
and those tables that have not yet been opened can be
safely skipped as they are not updated.
2026-05-21 16:11:47 +03:00
Thirunarayanan Balathandayuthapani
9f00ff0f58 MDEV-39081 InnoDB: tried to purge non-delete-marked record, assertion fails in row_purge_del_mark_error
Reason:
=======
Following the changes in MDEV-38734, the server no longer marks
all indexed virtual columns during an UPDATE operation.
Consequently, ha_innobase::update() populates the upd_t vector
with old_vrow but omits the actual data for these virtual columns.

Despite this omission, trx_undo_page_report_modify() continues to
write metadata for indexed virtual columns into the undo log. Because
the actual values are missing from the update vector, the undo log
entry is recorded without the historical data for these columns.

When the purge thread processes the undo log to reconstruct a
previous record state for MVCC, it identifies an indexed virtual
column but finds no associated data.

The purge thread incorrectly interprets this missing data as a NULL
value, rather than a "missing/unrecorded" value. The historical
record is reconstructed with an incorrect NULL for the virtual column.
This causes the purge thread to incorrectly identify and purge
records that are not actually delete-marked, leading to abort
of server.

Solution:
=========
ha_innobase::column_bitmaps_signal(): Revert the column-marking
logic to the state prior to commit a4e4a56720, ensuring all
indexed virtual columns are unconditionally marked during an UPDATE.

The previous "optimization" attempted to manually detect indexed
column changes before marking virtual columns. The manual check
for indexed column modifications is redundant. InnoDB already
provides the UPD_NODE_NO_ORD_CHANGE flag within row_upd_step().
This flag is being used in trx_undo_page_report_modify() and
trx_undo_read_undo_rec() should log or read virtual column values.

Refactored column_bitmaps_signal() to accept a mark_for_update
parameter that controls when indexed virtual columns are marked.
TABLE::mark_columns_needed_for_update() is the only place that needs
mark_for_update=true because only UPDATE operations need to mark
indexed virtual columns for InnoDB's undo logging mechanism.

INSERT operation is already handled by
TABLE::mark_virtual_columns_for_write(insert_fl=true).
Even the commit a4e4a56720 changes are
going to affect TABLE::mark_virtual_column_for_write(false) and
It is called during UPDATE operation, and that's when
column_bitmaps_signal() needs to mark  indexed virtual columns.

Online DDL has separate code path which is handled by
row_log_mark_virtual_cols() for all DML operations
2026-04-14 19:26:36 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
7c5cac0d51 Merge 10.11 into 11.4 2026-04-01 10:49:05 +03:00
Jan Lindström
1f34996880 MDEV-28750 : Assertion `trans_safe || !updated || thd->transaction->stmt.modified_non_trans_table' failed in virtual bool multi_update::send_eof()
Problem was that in multi-table update that contains tables that are not
transactional and tables that are transactional error handling does not
work correctly if write set size is limited. Because, Galera
replication for MyISAM is experimental it is better to avoid
multi-table updates in this case.

Fixed by not allowing multi-table updates if statement contains
non transactional and transactional tables and write set size
is limited.
2026-03-24 07:00:51 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
40f7084661 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.4 2026-01-28 21:52:18 +01:00
bsrikanth-mariadb
dc28140c89 MDEV-31255: Crash with fulltext search subquery in explain delete/update
ft_handler isn't getting initialized for subqueries inside explain
delete/update queries. However, ft_handler is accessed inside ha_ft_read(),
and is the reason for NULL pointer exception.
This is not the case with non-explain delete/update queries, as
well as explain/non-explain select queries.

Follow the approach the SELECT statements are using in
JOIN::optimize_constant_subqueries(): remove SELECT_DESCRIBE
flag when invoking optimization of constant subqueries.

Single-table UPDATE/DELETEs have SELECT_LEX but don't have JOIN.
So, we make optimize_constant_subqueries() not to be a member
of JOIN class, and instead move it to SELECT_LEX, and then
invoke it from single-table UPDATE/DELETE as well as for SELECT queries.
2026-01-27 16:42:41 +05:30
Sergei Golubchik
7e14749d96 MDEV-37341 Assertion failures null_ptr < ptr' and ptr - null_ptr <= (int)table->s->rec_buff_length' with BEFORE trigger and UPDATE
in SIMULTANEOUS_ASSIGNMENT there is no need to switch value items
to new nullable copies of table Field's - they must refer to old
values in the row, which can never be null anyway.

skipping this redundant step simplifies moving field to record[1]
and back in fill_record()
2026-01-26 10:01:31 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
15b1426c3a Merge branch '10.11' into bb-11.4-release 2025-09-15 16:17:33 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
0707dac202 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2025-09-12 13:08:40 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
5743435954 MDEV-37397 Assertion `bitmap_is_set(&read_partitions, next->id)' failed in int partition_info::vers_set_hist_part(THD *)
after 633417308f (MDEV-37312) lookup_handler is locked with F_WRLCK,
because it may be used for deleting rows.

And lookup_handler is locked with F_WRLCK after prune_partitions(),
but the main handler is locked before, and might expects all
partitions to be in the read least, non-pruned.

Let's prepare the lookup handler before prune_partitions().
2025-09-04 17:20:02 +02:00
Nikita Malyavin
0108664a8a Merge branch 10.11 into 11.4
# Conflicts:
#	sql/handler.h
#	sql/log_event.h
#	sql/log_event_server.cc
2025-09-02 15:58:39 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
bea8c6a304 MDEV-37198 Killed query with side effects without error
mysql_update() aborts if SQL_SELECT::check_quick() fails.
SQL_SELECT::check_quick() fails when thd->killed is set.
Thus, mysql_update() must also test thd->killed to know how to
terminate - normally (impossible where) or abnormally.
2025-07-29 13:32:53 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
c4ed889b74 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.4 2025-07-28 19:40:10 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
6521b4112b MDEV-37281 incorrect isolation level in update with unique using hash or without overlap
in 11.4 multi_update::prepare() is called both for single and multi update.
as it's invoked before lock_tables(), it cannot do prepare_for_insert(),
which calls external_lock() and only can be used on an already locked table
2025-07-23 00:06:52 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
a8d4642375 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.4 2025-04-26 10:53:02 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4d41ec081e Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2025-04-26 10:47:03 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
19644f6821 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2025-04-26 10:41:52 +02:00
Aleksey Midenkov
837fad6e41 MDEV-31647 Stack looping and SIGSEGV in Item_args::walk_args on UPDATE
The problem is with window function which requires its own sorting but
it is impossible as table is updated while select is
progressing. That's it, multi-update queries do not use temporary
tables to store updated rows and substitute them at the end of the
query. Instead, updates are performed directly on the target table,
row by row, during query execution. MariaDB processes updates in a way
that ensures each row is updated only once, even if it matches
multiple conditions in the query. This behavior avoids redundant
updates and does not require intermediate storage in a temporary table.

The detailed cause of the loop invoked by window function was
explained by Yuchen Pei in MDEV-31647 comments.

The fix disables window functions for multi-update.

Note that MySQL throws ER_UPDATE_TABLE_USED in that case which is the
result of check_unique_table(). But this function is not used for
multi-update in MariaDB and this check cannot be done because some
level of SELECT expressions is allowed (MDEV-13911).
2025-04-21 21:13:52 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
20b818f45e Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2025-04-21 11:23:11 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
a135551569 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2025-04-21 10:43:17 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
7f1492d0bc cleanup: rename hide_view_error->replace_view_error_with_generic
as requested by Monty
2025-04-17 17:22:56 +02:00
Dave Gosselin
d3c9a2ee21 MDEV-35510 ASAN build crashes during bootstrap
Avoid ASAN failure by collecting statistics from Result objects
before cleaning them up.  In related single-table cases, statistics
are maintained directly by the single-table update and delete
functions.
2025-04-14 12:56:39 -04:00
Sergei Golubchik
7d657fda64 Merge branch '10.11 into 11.4 2025-01-30 12:01:11 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
e69f8cae1a Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2025-01-30 11:55:13 +01:00
Marko Mäkelä
98dbe3bfaf Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2025-01-20 09:57:37 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
a69da0c31e MDEV-19761 Before Trigger not processed for Not Null Columns if no explicit value and no DEFAULT
it's incorrect to zero out table->triggers->extra_null_bitmap
before a statement, because if insert uses an explicit field list
and omits a field that has no default value, the field should
get NULL implicitly. So extra_null_bitmap should have 1s for all
fields that have no defaults

* create extra_null_bitmap_init and initialize it as above
* copy extra_null_bitmap_init to extra_null_bitmap for inserts
* still zero out extra_null_bitmap for updates/deletes where
  all fields definitely have a value
* make not_null_fields_have_null_values() to send
  ER_NO_DEFAULT_FOR_FIELD for fields with no default and no value,
  otherwise creation of a trigger with an empty body would change the
  error message
2025-01-17 23:42:56 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
0d35fe6e57 MDEV-35326: Memory Leak in init_io_cache_ext upon SHUTDOWN
The problems were that:
1) resources was freed "asimetric" normal execution in send_eof,
 in case of error in destructor.
2) destructor was not called in case of SP for result objects.
(so if the last SP execution ended with error resorces was not
freeded on reinit before execution (cleanup() called before next
execution) and destructor also was not called due to lack of
delete call for the object)

Result cleanup() renamed to reset_for_next_ps_execution() to better
reflect function().

All result method revised and freeing resources made "symetric".

Destructor of result object called for SP.

Added skipped invalidation in case of error in insert.

Removed misleading naming of reset(thd) (could be mixed with
with reset()).
2025-01-13 10:04:27 +01:00
Marko Mäkelä
17f01186f5 Merge 10.11 into 11.4 2025-01-09 07:58:08 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
3f914afd3a Merge 10.6 into 10.11 2025-01-02 12:39:56 +02:00
Yuchen Pei
671f80c738 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-12-17 11:06:09 +11:00
Dmitry Shulga
54c1031b74 MDEV-34958: after Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk insert
This bug has the same nature as the issues
  MDEV-34718: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk update
  MDEV-24411: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk insert

To fix the issue covering all use cases, resetting the thd->bulk_param
temporary to the value nullptr before invoking triggers and restoring
its original value on finishing execution of a trigger is moved to the method
  Table_triggers_list::process_triggers
that be invoked ultimately for any kind of triggers.
2024-12-13 16:19:39 +07:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
c770bce898 Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-10-30 15:11:17 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
69d033d165 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-10-29 16:42:46 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
3d0fb15028 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-10-29 15:24:38 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f00711bba2 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-10-29 14:20:03 +01:00
Yuchen Pei
b8c2bd9f69 MDEV-35249 Fix regression caused by MDEV-34447
MDEV-34447 Removed setting first_cond_optimization to 0 in update and
delete when leaf_tables_saved. This can cause problems when two ps
executions of an update go through different paths, where the first ps
execution goes through single table update only and the second ps
execution also goes through multi table update. When this happens, the
first_cond_optimization of the outer query is not set to false during
the first ps execution because optimize() is not called for the outer
query. But then the second ps execution will call optimize() on the
outer query, which with first_cond_optimization==true trips the 2nd ps
mem leak detection.

This is not a problem in higher version as both executions go through
multi table updates, possibly due to MDEV-28883.

We fix this problem by restoring the FALSE assignments to
first_cond_optimization.
2024-10-25 18:03:40 +11:00
Sergei Golubchik
3a1cf2c85b MDEV-34679 ER_BAD_FIELD uses non-localizable substrings 2024-10-17 21:37:37 +02:00
Yuchen Pei
1f7f406b7b Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-09-18 11:27:53 +10:00
Sergei Petrunia
5cd3fa81ef Merge 10.11 -> 11.2 2024-09-17 12:34:33 +03:00
Yuchen Pei
d002b1f503 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-09-09 11:34:19 +10:00
Yuchen Pei
60b93cdd30 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-09-06 13:52:57 +10:00
Yuchen Pei
e886c2ba02 MDEV-34757 Check leaf_tables_saved in partition pruning in UPDATE and DELETE 2024-09-06 11:41:59 +10:00
Yuchen Pei
2c3e07df47 MDEV-34447: Memory leakage is detected on running the test main.ps against the server 11.1
The memory leak happened on second execution of a prepared statement
that runs UPDATE statement with correlated subquery in right hand side of
the SET clause. In this case, invocation of the method
  table->stat_records()
could return the zero value that results in going into the 'if' branch
that handles impossible where condition. The issue is that this condition
branch missed saving of leaf tables that has to be performed as first
condition optimization activity. Later the PS statement memory root
is marked as read only on finishing first time execution of the prepared
statement. Next time the same statement is executed it hits the assertion
on attempt to allocate a memory on the PS memory root marked as read only.
This memory allocation takes place by the sequence of the following
invocations:
 Prepared_statement::execute
  mysql_execute_command
   Sql_cmd_dml::execute
    Sql_cmd_update::execute_inner
     Sql_cmd_update::update_single_table
      st_select_lex::save_leaf_tables
       List<TABLE_LIST>::push_back

To fix the issue, add the flag SELECT_LEX::leaf_tables_saved to control
whether the method SELECT_LEX::save_leaf_tables() has to be called or
it has been already invoked and no more invocation required.

Similar issue could take place on running the DELETE statement with
the LIMIT clause in PS/SP mode. The reason of memory leak is the same as for
UPDATE case and be fixed in the same way.
2024-09-06 11:41:58 +10:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
eb70e0d6e2 Merge branch '11.2' into 11.4 2024-08-21 09:30:54 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
6197e6abc4 Merge branch '10.11' into 11.2 2024-08-21 07:58:46 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
70afc62750 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.11 2024-08-20 10:00:39 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
fc5772ce17 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2024-08-20 09:11:34 +02:00
Dmitry Shulga
ba5482ffc2 MDEV-34718: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk update
Running an UPDATE statement in PS mode and having positional
parameter(s) bound with an array of actual values (that is
prepared to be run in bulk mode) results in incorrect behaviour
in presence of on update trigger that also executes an UPDATE
statement. The same is true for handling a DELETE statement in
presence of on delete trigger. Typically, the visible effect of
such incorrect behaviour is expressed in a wrong number of
updated/deleted rows of a target table. Additionally, in case UPDATE
statement, a number of modified rows and a state message returned
by a statement contains wrong information about a number of modified rows.

The reason for incorrect number of updated/deleted rows is that
a data structure used for binding positional argument with its
actual values is stored in THD (this is thd->bulk_param) and reused
on processing every INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement. It leads to
consuming actual values bound with top-level UPDATE/DELETE statement
by other DML statements used by triggers' body.

To fix the issue, reset the thd->bulk_param temporary to the value
nullptr before invoking triggers and restore its value on finishing
its execution.

The second part of the problem relating with wrong value of affected
rows reported by Connector/C API is caused by the fact that diagnostics
area is reused by an original DML statement and a statement invoked
by a trigger. This fact should be take into account on finalizing a
state of diagnostics area on completion running of a statement.

Important remark: in case the macros DBUG_OFF is on, call of the method
  Diagnostics_area::reset_diagnostics_area()
results in reset of the data members
  m_affected_rows, m_statement_warn_count.
Values of these data members of the class Diagnostics_area are used on
sending OK and EOF messages. In case DML statement is executed in PS bulk
mode such resetting results in sending wrong result values to a client
for affected rows in case the DML statement fires a triggers. So, reset
these data members only in case the current statement being processed
is not run in bulk mode.
2024-08-19 12:13:43 +07:00