1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-08 11:22:35 +03:00

Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly:

field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases

Building multiple equality predicates containing
a constant which is compared as a datetime (with a field)
we should take this fact into account and compare the 
constant with another possible constatns as datetimes 
as well.

E.g. for the
SELECT ... WHERE a='2001-01-01' AND a='2001-01-01 00:00:00'
we should compare '2001-01-01' with '2001-01-01 00:00:00' as
datetimes but not as strings.


mysql-test/r/select.result:
  Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly: 
  field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases
    - test result.
mysql-test/t/select.test:
  Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly: 
  field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases
    - test case.
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
  Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly: 
  field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases
    - adding a constant to Item_equal compare it as
  a datetime value with stored one if there's a 
  date[time] field in a equality predicate.
sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
  Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly: 
  field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases
    - adding a constant to Item_equal compare it as
  a datetime value with stored one if there's a 
  date[time] field in a equality predicate.
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Fix for bug#49199: Optimizer handles incorrectly: 
  field='const1' AND field='const2' in some cases
    - adding a constant to Item_equal compare it as
  a datetime value with stored one if there's a 
  date[time] field in a equality predicate.
This commit is contained in:
Ramil Kalimullin
2009-12-04 21:58:40 +04:00
parent 026541c662
commit f5b51bc1e2
5 changed files with 178 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -4903,7 +4903,8 @@ Item *Item_bool_rowready_func2::negated_item()
}
Item_equal::Item_equal(Item_field *f1, Item_field *f2)
: Item_bool_func(), const_item(0), eval_item(0), cond_false(0)
: Item_bool_func(), const_item(0), eval_item(0), cond_false(0),
compare_as_dates(FALSE)
{
const_item_cache= 0;
fields.push_back(f1);
@@ -4916,6 +4917,7 @@ Item_equal::Item_equal(Item *c, Item_field *f)
const_item_cache= 0;
fields.push_back(f);
const_item= c;
compare_as_dates= f->is_datetime();
}
@@ -4930,9 +4932,45 @@ Item_equal::Item_equal(Item_equal *item_equal)
fields.push_back(item);
}
const_item= item_equal->const_item;
compare_as_dates= item_equal->compare_as_dates;
cond_false= item_equal->cond_false;
}
void Item_equal::compare_const(Item *c)
{
if (compare_as_dates)
{
cmp.set_datetime_cmp_func(&c, &const_item);
cond_false= cmp.compare();
}
else
{
Item_func_eq *func= new Item_func_eq(c, const_item);
func->set_cmp_func();
func->quick_fix_field();
cond_false= !func->val_int();
}
if (cond_false)
const_item_cache= 1;
}
void Item_equal::add(Item *c, Item_field *f)
{
if (cond_false)
return;
if (!const_item)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(f);
const_item= c;
compare_as_dates= f->is_datetime();
return;
}
compare_const(c);
}
void Item_equal::add(Item *c)
{
if (cond_false)
@@ -4942,11 +4980,7 @@ void Item_equal::add(Item *c)
const_item= c;
return;
}
Item_func_eq *func= new Item_func_eq(c, const_item);
func->set_cmp_func();
func->quick_fix_field();
if ((cond_false= !func->val_int()))
const_item_cache= 1;
compare_const(c);
}
void Item_equal::add(Item_field *f)