mirror of
https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git
synced 2025-06-13 13:01:51 +03:00
BUG#28976 Mixing trans and non-trans tables in one transaction results in incorrect
binlog Mixing transactional (T) and non-transactional (N) tables on behalf of a transaction may lead to inconsistencies among masters and slaves in STATEMENT mode. The problem stems from the fact that although modifications done to non-transactional tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible to other connections they do not immediately get to the binary log and therefore consistency is broken. Although there may be issues in mixing T and M tables in STATEMENT mode, there are safe combinations that clients find useful. In this bug, we fix the following issue. Mixing N and T tables in multi-level (e.g. a statement that fires a trigger) or multi-table table statements (e.g. update t1, t2...) were not handled correctly. In such cases, it was not possible to distinguish when a T table was updated if the sequence of changes was N and T. In a nutshell, just the flag "modified_non_trans_table" was not enough to reflect that both a N and T tables were changed. To circumvent this issue, we check if an engine is registered in the handler's list and changed something which means that a T table was modified. Check WL 2687 for a full-fledged patch that will make the use of either the MIXED or ROW modes completely safe.
This commit is contained in:
@ -725,9 +725,9 @@ call p_verify_status_increment(4, 4, 4, 4);
|
||||
alter table t3 add column (b int);
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(2, 0, 2, 0);
|
||||
alter table t3 rename t4;
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(1, 0, 1, 0);
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(2, 2, 2, 2);
|
||||
rename table t4 to t3;
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(1, 0, 1, 0);
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(2, 2, 2, 2);
|
||||
truncate table t3;
|
||||
call p_verify_status_increment(4, 4, 4, 4);
|
||||
create view v1 as select * from t2;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user