mirror of
https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git
synced 2025-08-07 00:04:31 +03:00
MDEV-8302: Duplicate key with parallel replication
This bug is essentially another variant of MDEV-7458. If a transaction conflict caused a deadlock kill of T2 in record_gtid() during commit, the code would do a rollback _before_ running rgi->unmark_start_commit(). This creates a race where following transactions could start too early (before T2 has completed its transaction retry). This in turn could lead to replication failure, if there was a conflict that caused eg. duplicate key error or similar. The fix is to remove these rollbacks (in Query_log_event::do_apply_event() and Xid_log_event::do_apply_event(). They seem out-of-place; code in log_event.cc generally does not roll back on error, this is handled higher up. In addition, because of the extreme difficulty of reproducing bugs like MDEV-7458 and MDEV-8302, this patch adds some extra precations to try to detect (in debug builds) or prevent (in release builds) similar bugs. ha_rollback_trans() will now call unmark_start_commit() if needed (and assert in debug build when a caller does rollback without unmark first). We also add an extra check for thd->killed() so that we avoid doing mark_start_commit() if we already have a pending deadlock kill. And we add a missing unmark_start_commit() call in the error case, found by the above assertion.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static void
|
||||
signal_error_to_sql_driver_thread(THD *thd, rpl_group_info *rgi, int err)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rgi->worker_error= err;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
In case we get an error during commit, inform following transactions that
|
||||
we aborted our commit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rgi->unmark_start_commit();
|
||||
rgi->cleanup_context(thd, true);
|
||||
rgi->rli->abort_slave= true;
|
||||
rgi->rli->stop_for_until= false;
|
||||
@@ -370,6 +375,7 @@ do_retry:
|
||||
transaction we deadlocked with will not signal that it started to commit
|
||||
until after the unmark.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DBUG_EXECUTE_IF("inject_mdev8302", { my_sleep(20000);});
|
||||
rgi->unmark_start_commit();
|
||||
DEBUG_SYNC(thd, "rpl_parallel_retry_after_unmark");
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -884,9 +890,24 @@ handle_rpl_parallel_thread(void *arg)
|
||||
group_ending= is_group_ending(qev->ev, event_type);
|
||||
if (group_ending && likely(!rgi->worker_error))
|
||||
{
|
||||
DEBUG_SYNC(thd, "rpl_parallel_before_mark_start_commit");
|
||||
rgi->mark_start_commit();
|
||||
DEBUG_SYNC(thd, "rpl_parallel_after_mark_start_commit");
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Do an extra check for (deadlock) kill here. This helps prevent a
|
||||
lingering deadlock kill that occured during normal DML processing to
|
||||
propagate past the mark_start_commit(). If we detect a deadlock only
|
||||
after mark_start_commit(), we have to unmark, which has at least a
|
||||
theoretical possibility of leaving a window where it looks like all
|
||||
transactions in a GCO have started committing, while in fact one
|
||||
will need to rollback and retry. This is not supposed to be possible
|
||||
(since there is a deadlock, at least one transaction should be
|
||||
blocked from reaching commit), but this seems a fragile ensurance,
|
||||
and there were historically a number of subtle bugs in this area.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!thd->killed)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DEBUG_SYNC(thd, "rpl_parallel_before_mark_start_commit");
|
||||
rgi->mark_start_commit();
|
||||
DEBUG_SYNC(thd, "rpl_parallel_after_mark_start_commit");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -911,7 +932,17 @@ handle_rpl_parallel_thread(void *arg)
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (!err)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
err= rpt_handle_event(qev, rpt);
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (thd->check_killed())
|
||||
{
|
||||
thd->clear_error();
|
||||
thd->get_stmt_da()->reset_diagnostics_area();
|
||||
thd->send_kill_message();
|
||||
err= 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
err= rpt_handle_event(qev, rpt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
delete_or_keep_event_post_apply(rgi, event_type, qev->ev);
|
||||
DBUG_EXECUTE_IF("rpl_parallel_simulate_temp_err_gtid_0_x_100",
|
||||
err= dbug_simulate_tmp_error(rgi, thd););
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user