mirror of
https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git
synced 2025-07-30 16:24:05 +03:00
BUG#22393: Very wrong E(#rows(ref(const)) for key with skewed distribution
- Check if we have E(#rows) for 'range' access on the smaller interval on the same index. If yes, adjust the estimate. mysql-test/r/range.result: BUG#22393: Testcase mysql-test/t/range.test: BUG#22393: Testcase
This commit is contained in:
@ -896,3 +896,17 @@ EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 0 NOT BETWEEN b AND c;
|
||||
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
|
||||
1 SIMPLE t1 index_merge idx1,idx2 idx1,idx2 4,4 NULL 4 Using sort_union(idx1,idx2); Using where
|
||||
DROP TABLE t1;
|
||||
create table t1 (a int);
|
||||
insert into t1 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
|
||||
create table t2 (a int, b int, filler char(100));
|
||||
insert into t2 select A.a + 10 * (B.a + 10 * C.a), 10, 'filler' from t1 A,
|
||||
t1 B, t1 C where A.a < 5;
|
||||
insert into t2 select 1000, b, 'filler' from t2;
|
||||
alter table t2 add index (a,b);
|
||||
select 'In following EXPLAIN the access method should be ref, #rows~=500 (and not 2)' Z;
|
||||
Z
|
||||
In following EXPLAIN the access method should be ref, #rows~=500 (and not 2)
|
||||
explain select * from t2 where a=1000 and b<11;
|
||||
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
|
||||
1 SIMPLE t2 ref a a 5 const 502 Using where
|
||||
drop table t1, t2;
|
||||
|
@ -711,3 +711,30 @@ DROP TABLE t1;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# End of 5.0 tests
|
||||
|
||||
# BUG#22393 fix: Adjust 'ref' estimate if we have 'range' estimate for
|
||||
# a smaller scan interval
|
||||
create table t1 (a int);
|
||||
insert into t1 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
|
||||
|
||||
create table t2 (a int, b int, filler char(100));
|
||||
insert into t2 select A.a + 10 * (B.a + 10 * C.a), 10, 'filler' from t1 A,
|
||||
t1 B, t1 C where A.a < 5;
|
||||
|
||||
insert into t2 select 1000, b, 'filler' from t2;
|
||||
alter table t2 add index (a,b);
|
||||
# t2 values
|
||||
# ( 1 , 10, 'filler')
|
||||
# ( 2 , 10, 'filler')
|
||||
# ( 3 , 10, 'filler')
|
||||
# (... , 10, 'filler')
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
# (1000, 10, 'filler') - 500 times
|
||||
|
||||
# 500 rows, 1 row
|
||||
|
||||
select 'In following EXPLAIN the access method should be ref, #rows~=500 (and not 2)' Z;
|
||||
explain select * from t2 where a=1000 and b<11;
|
||||
|
||||
drop table t1, t2;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3711,7 +3711,30 @@ best_access_path(JOIN *join,
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Check if we have statistic about the distribution */
|
||||
if ((records= keyinfo->rec_per_key[max_key_part-1]))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Fix for the case where the index statistics is too
|
||||
optimistic: If
|
||||
(1) We're considering ref(const) and there is quick select
|
||||
on the same index,
|
||||
(2) and that quick select uses more keyparts (i.e. it will
|
||||
scan equal/smaller interval then this ref(const))
|
||||
(3) and E(#rows) for quick select is higher then our
|
||||
estimate,
|
||||
Then
|
||||
We'll use E(#rows) from quick select.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why do we choose to use 'ref'? Won't quick select be
|
||||
cheaper in some cases ?
|
||||
TODO: figure this out and adjust the plan choice if needed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!found_ref && table->quick_keys.is_set(key) && // (1)
|
||||
table->quick_key_parts[key] > max_key_part && // (2)
|
||||
records < (double)table->quick_rows[key]) // (3)
|
||||
records= (double)table->quick_rows[key];
|
||||
|
||||
tmp= records;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user