1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-07-29 05:21:33 +03:00

Bug#25376: Incomplete setup of ORDER BY clause results in a wrong result.

Functions over sum functions wasn't set up correctly for the ORDER BY clause
which leads to a wrong order of the result set.

The split_sum_func() function is called now for each ORDER BY item that
contains a sum function to set it up correctly.


mysql-test/t/order_by.test:
  Added a test case for bug#25376: Incomplete setup of ORDER BY clause results in a wrong result.
mysql-test/r/order_by.result:
  Added a test case for bug#25376: Incomplete setup of ORDER BY clause results in a wrong result.
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Bug#25376: Incomplete setup of ORDER BY clause results in a wrong result.
  The split_sum_func() function is called now for each ORDER BY item that
  contains a sum function to set it up correctly.
This commit is contained in:
unknown
2007-03-06 23:58:10 +03:00
parent 476f91b50c
commit 38acf43e34
3 changed files with 27 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -926,3 +926,11 @@ NULL
2
3
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4;
create table t1 (a int, b int, c int);
insert into t1 values (1,2,3), (9,8,3), (19,4,3), (1,4,9);
select a,(sum(b)/sum(c)) as ratio from t1 group by a order by sum(b)/sum(c) asc;
a ratio
1 0.5000
19 1.3333
9 2.6667
drop table t1;

View File

@ -640,3 +640,11 @@ SELECT t2.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN (t2, t3 LEFT JOIN t4 ON t3.a=t4.a)
ON (t1.a=t2.a AND t1.b=t3.b) order by t2.b;
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4;
#
# Bug#25376: Incomplete setup of ORDER BY clause results in a wrong result.
#
create table t1 (a int, b int, c int);
insert into t1 values (1,2,3), (9,8,3), (19,4,3), (1,4,9);
select a,(sum(b)/sum(c)) as ratio from t1 group by a order by sum(b)/sum(c) asc;
drop table t1;

View File

@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ JOIN::prepare(Item ***rref_pointer_array,
select_lex->fix_prepare_information(thd, &conds, &having);
if (order)
{
ORDER *ord;
for (ord= order; ord; ord= ord->next)
{
Item *item= *ord->item;
if (item->with_sum_func && item->type() != Item::SUM_FUNC_ITEM)
item->split_sum_func(thd, ref_pointer_array, all_fields);
}
}
if (having && having->with_sum_func)
having->split_sum_func2(thd, ref_pointer_array, all_fields,
&having, TRUE);