1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-12-24 11:21:21 +03:00

Bug#52815: LIST COLUMNS doesn't insert rows in correct

partition if muliple columns used

Problem was that range scanning through the sorted array of
the column list values did not use a correct index calculation.

Fixed by also taking the number of columns in the calculation.
This commit is contained in:
Mattias Jonsson
2010-04-21 15:32:27 -07:00
parent 9ba731c299
commit 2faf4ddfd4
3 changed files with 76 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ int get_partition_id_list_col(partition_info *part_info,
}
else
{
*part_id= (uint32)list_col_array[list_index].partition_id;
*part_id= (uint32)list_col_array[list_index*num_columns].partition_id;
DBUG_RETURN(0);
}
}
@@ -7701,7 +7701,7 @@ uint32 get_next_partition_id_range(PARTITION_ITERATOR* part_iter)
DESCRIPTION
This implementation of PARTITION_ITERATOR::get_next() is special for
LIST partitioning: it enumerates partition ids in
part_info->list_array[i] (list_col_array[i] for COLUMNS LIST
part_info->list_array[i] (list_col_array[i*cols] for COLUMNS LIST
partitioning) where i runs over [min_idx, max_idx] interval.
The function conforms to partition_iter_func type.
@@ -7727,9 +7727,12 @@ uint32 get_next_partition_id_list(PARTITION_ITERATOR *part_iter)
{
partition_info *part_info= part_iter->part_info;
uint32 num_part= part_iter->part_nums.cur++;
return part_info->column_list ?
part_info->list_col_array[num_part].partition_id :
part_info->list_array[num_part].partition_id;
if (part_info->column_list)
{
uint num_columns= part_info->part_field_list.elements;
return part_info->list_col_array[num_part*num_columns].partition_id;
}
return part_info->list_array[num_part].partition_id;
}
}