1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-08 11:22:35 +03:00

BUG#34768 - nondeterministic INSERT using LIMIT logged in stmt mode if

binlog_format=mixed

Statement-based replication of DELETE ... LIMIT, UPDATE ... LIMIT,
INSERT ... SELECT ... LIMIT is not safe as order of rows is not
defined.

With this fix, we issue a warning that this statement is not safe to
replicate in statement mode, or go to row-based mode in mixed mode.

Note that we may consider a statement as safe if ORDER BY primary_key
is present. However it may confuse users to see very similiar statements
replicated differently.

Note 2: regular UPDATE statement (w/o LIMIT) is unsafe as well, but
this patch doesn't address this issue. See comment from Kristian
posted 18 Mar 10:55.


mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_ps.result:
  Updated a test case according to fix for BUG#34768:
  INSERT ... SELECT ... LIMIT is now replicated in row mode.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result:
  A test case for BUG#34768.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_unsafe.test:
  A test case for BUG#34768.
sql/sql_delete.cc:
  Statement-based replication of DELETE ... LIMIT is not safe as order of
  rows is not defined, so in mixed mode we go to row-based.
sql/sql_insert.cc:
  Statement-based replication of INSERT ... SELECT ... LIMIT is not safe
  as order of rows is not defined, so in mixed mode we go to row-based.
sql/sql_update.cc:
  Statement-based replication of UPDATE ... LIMIT is not safe as order of
  rows is not defined, so in mixed mode we go to row-based.
This commit is contained in:
unknown
2008-03-18 20:25:34 +04:00
parent 1bffc51066
commit 1626b42ca3
6 changed files with 90 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -859,6 +859,19 @@ bool mysql_prepare_update(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
SELECT_LEX *select_lex= &thd->lex->select_lex;
DBUG_ENTER("mysql_prepare_update");
/*
Statement-based replication of UPDATE ... LIMIT is not safe as order of
rows is not defined, so in mixed mode we go to row-based.
Note that we may consider a statement as safe if ORDER BY primary_key
is present. However it may confuse users to see very similiar statements
replicated differently.
*/
if (thd->lex->current_select->select_limit)
{
thd->lex->set_stmt_unsafe();
thd->set_current_stmt_binlog_row_based_if_mixed();
}
#ifndef NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS
table_list->grant.want_privilege= table->grant.want_privilege=
(SELECT_ACL & ~table->grant.privilege);