MDEV-29895 prepared view crash server (unit.conc_view)

it's incorrect to use change_item_tree() to replace arguments
of top-level AND/OR, because they (arguments) are stored in a List,
so a pointer to an argument is in the list_node, and individual
list_node's of top-level AND/OR can be deleted in Item_cond::build_equal_items().
In that case rollback_item_tree_changes() will modify the deleted object.

Luckily, it's not needed to use change_item_tree() for top-level
AND/OR, because the whole top-level item is copied and preserved
in prep_where and prep_on, and restored from there.

So, just don't.

mysql-test/main/func_in.result

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-drop table if exists t1, t2;
 select 1 in (1,2,3);
 1 in (1,2,3)
 1
@@ -942,6 +941,9 @@ SELECT ('0x',1) IN ((0,1),(1,1));
 Warnings:
 Warning	1292	Truncated incorrect DECIMAL value: '0x'
 #
+# End of 10.4 tests
+#
+#
 # MDEV-29662 same values in `IN` set vs equal comparison produces
 #            the different performance
 #
@@ -1153,5 +1155,16 @@ DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3, t4;
 DROP VIEW v1;
 DROP PROCEDURE p1;
 #
-# End of 10.4 tests
+# MDEV-29895 prepared view crash server (unit.conc_view)
+#
+create table t1 (username varchar(12) not null, id int(11) not null);
+create view v1 as select username from t1 where id = 0;
+prepare stmt from "select username from v1 where username in (?, ?)";
+execute stmt using "1", "1";
+username
+deallocate prepare stmt;
+drop view v1;
+drop table t1;
+#
+# End of 10.6 tests
 #

mysql-test/main/func_in.test

@@ -1,7 +1,3 @@
-# Initialise
---disable_warnings
-drop table if exists t1, t2;
---enable_warnings
 #
 # test of IN (NULL)
 #
@@ -721,6 +717,10 @@ SELECT '0x' IN (0,1);
 SELECT ('0x',1) IN ((0,1));
 SELECT ('0x',1) IN ((0,1),(1,1));
 
+--echo #
+--echo # End of 10.4 tests
+--echo #
+
 --echo #
 --echo # MDEV-29662 same values in `IN` set vs equal comparison produces
 --echo #            the different performance
@@ -840,6 +840,18 @@ DROP VIEW v1;
 DROP PROCEDURE p1;
 
 --echo #
---echo # End of 10.4 tests
+--echo # MDEV-29895 prepared view crash server (unit.conc_view)
+--echo #
+
+create table t1 (username varchar(12) not null, id int(11) not null);
+create view v1 as select username from t1 where id = 0;
+prepare stmt from "select username from v1 where username in (?, ?)";
+execute stmt using "1", "1";
+deallocate prepare stmt;
+drop view v1;
+drop table t1;
+
+--echo #
+--echo # End of 10.6 tests
 --echo #
 

sql/item.h

@@ -2112,6 +2112,11 @@ public:
   }
 
   virtual Item* transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer, uchar *arg);
+  virtual Item* top_level_transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer,
+                                    uchar *arg)
+  {
+    return transform(thd, transformer, arg);
+  }
 
   /*
     This function performs a generic "compilation" of the Item tree.

sql/item_cmpfunc.cc

@@ -5226,6 +5226,35 @@ Item *Item_cond::transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer, uchar *arg)
 }
 
 
+/**
+  Transform an Item_cond object with a transformer callback function.
+
+  This is like transform() but doesn't use change_item_tree(),
+  because top-level expression is stored in prep_where/prep_on anyway and
+  is restored from there, there is no need to use change_item_tree().
+
+  Furthermore, it can be actually harmful to use it, if build_equal_items()
+  had replaced Item_eq with Item_equal and deleted list_node with a pointer
+  to Item_eq. In this case rollback_item_tree_changes() would modify the
+  deleted list_node.
+*/
+Item *Item_cond::top_level_transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer, uchar *arg)
+{
+  DBUG_ASSERT(!thd->stmt_arena->is_stmt_prepare());
+
+  List_iterator<Item> li(list);
+  Item *item;
+  while ((item= li++))
+  {
+    Item *new_item= item->transform(thd, transformer, arg);
+    if (!new_item)
+      return 0;
+    *li.ref()= new_item;
+  }
+  return Item_func::transform(thd, transformer, arg);
+}
+
+
 /**
   Compile Item_cond object with a processor and a transformer
   callback functions.

sql/item_cmpfunc.h

@@ -3193,6 +3193,7 @@ public:
   void copy_andor_arguments(THD *thd, Item_cond *item);
   bool walk(Item_processor processor, bool walk_subquery, void *arg) override;
   Item *transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer, uchar *arg) override;
+  Item *top_level_transform(THD *thd, Item_transformer transformer, uchar *arg) override;
   void traverse_cond(Cond_traverser, void *arg, traverse_order order) override;
   void neg_arguments(THD *thd);
   Item* propagate_equal_fields(THD *, const Context &, COND_EQUAL *) override;

sql/sql_select.cc

@@ -30523,7 +30523,7 @@ bool JOIN::transform_all_conds_and_on_exprs(THD *thd,
 {
   if (conds)
   {
-    conds= conds->transform(thd, transformer, (uchar *) 0);
+    conds= conds->top_level_transform(thd, transformer, (uchar *) 0);
     if (!conds)
       return true;
   }
@@ -30553,7 +30553,7 @@ bool JOIN::transform_all_conds_and_on_exprs_in_join_list(
     }
     if (table->on_expr)
     {
-      table->on_expr= table->on_expr->transform(thd, transformer, (uchar *) 0);
+      table->on_expr= table->on_expr->top_level_transform(thd, transformer, 0);
       if (!table->on_expr)
         return true;
     }