# Let's verify that multi-update is not always skipped by slave if
# some replicate-* rules exist.
# (BUG#7011)

--disable_warnings
drop table if exists t1,t2;
--enable_warnings

eval CREATE TABLE t1 (
 a int unsigned not null auto_increment primary key,
 b int unsigned
) ENGINE=$engine_type;

eval CREATE TABLE t2 (
 a int unsigned not null auto_increment primary key,
 b int unsigned
) ENGINE=$engine_type;

INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, 0);
INSERT INTO t1 SELECT NULL, 0 FROM t1;

INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (NULL, 0), (NULL,1);

SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;
SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY a;

UPDATE t1, t2 SET t1.b = (t2.b+4) WHERE t1.a = t2.a;
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;
SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY a;

save_master_pos;
connection slave;
sync_with_master;
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;
SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY a;

connection master;
drop table t1,t2;
sync_slave_with_master;

#
# BUG#13236 multi-update with subquery & --replicate-ignore-table
#
reset master;

connection master;
CREATE TABLE t1 ( a INT );
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (0);
UPDATE t1, (SELECT 3 as b) AS x SET t1.a = x.b;
select * from t1;
sync_slave_with_master;

connection slave;
select * from t1;

connection master;
drop table t1;
sync_slave_with_master;

# End of 4.1 tests
