### Initial Releases v1.0.0
1. Initial coding to support **Portenta_H7 boards** such as Portenta_H7 Rev2 ABX00042, etc., using [**ArduinoCore-mbed mbed_portenta** core](https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-mbed)
The system is designed to allow a submission to be accomplished in a single pull request. This is the case even when
initial passes of checks reveal problems that block acceptance. The checks will automatically re-run any time the PR
author pushes to the PR's branch or mentions the bot.
Although the submitters are welcome to submit a new PR if that is their preference, it is a less efficient approach, both
for them and the maintainer. So it's important to clearly communicate that the submission process can be continued via
the current PR if that is convenient to them.
Usage patterns indicate that this is not clearly communicated via the current messaging from the bot, so perhaps an
additional note with some styling to give it emphasis will improve on the user experience.
### Initial Releases v1.0.0
1. Initial coding to support MBED nRF52840-based boards such as **Nano_33_BLE, Nano_33_BLE_Sense**, etc. using [**Arduino-mbed mbed_nano** core](https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-mbed)
* add TCA9555
* add RobTIllaart/SGP30
* Add AGS02MA
TVOC sensor - experimental library, use low speed I2C < 30 KHz, UNO does not really work as it cannot go that low.
* add MTP40C CO2 and air pressure sensor
* Add MTP40C CO2 and air pressure sensor
* Update repositories.txt
add experimental library - DAC8550
A new release of the `arduino/library-manager-submission-parser` tool used by the "Manage PRs" workflow has been made.
This release fixes a bug that caused pull requests that consisted only of newlines to be incorrectly classified as
"modification", resulting in an unexpected failure of the workflow run due to there being no library URLs to populate the
`check-submissions` job matrix:
```
Error when evaluating 'strategy' for job 'check-submissions'. (Line: 219, Col: 21): Unexpected value ''
```
These pull requests will now be assigned the appropriate "other" request type and the workflow run will pass as expected,
requesting the necessary manual review from a maintainer.
